24 h-accelerometry in epidemiological studies: automated detection of non-wear time in comparison to diary information

Estimation of physical activity using 24 h-accelerometry requires detection of accelerometer non-wear time (NWT). It is common practice to define NWT as periods >60 minutes of consecutive zero-accelerations, but this algorithm was originally developed for waking hours only and its applicability to 24 h-accelerometry is unclear. We investigated sensitivity and specificity of different algorithms to detect NWT in 24 h-accelerometry compared to diary in 47 ActivE and 559 KORA participants. NWT was determined with algorithms >60, >90, >120, >150, or >180 minutes of consecutive zero-counts. Overall, 9.1% (ActivE) and 15.4% (KORA) of reported NWT was >60 minutes. Sensitivity and specificity were lowest for the 60-min algorithm in ActivE (0.72 and 0.00) and KORA (0.64 and 0.08), and highest for the 180-min algorithm in ActivE (0.88 and 0.92) and for the 120-min algorithm in KORA (0.76 and 0.74). Nevertheless, when applying these last two algorithms, the overlap of accelerometry with any diary based NWT minutes was around 20% only. In conclusion, only a small proportion of NWT is >60 minutes. The 60-min algorithm is less suitable for NWT detection in 24 h-accelerometry because of low sensitivity, specificity, and small overlap with reported NWT minutes. Longer algorithms perform better but detect lower proportions of reported NWT.

[1]  Leena Choi,et al.  Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  German National Cohort Consortium,et al.  The German National Cohort: aims, study design and organization , 2014, European Journal of Epidemiology.

[3]  Pedagógia,et al.  Cross Sectional Study , 2019 .

[4]  Dinesh John,et al.  Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. , 2011, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[5]  New S Tudy The German National Cohort: aims, study design and organization , 2014 .

[6]  N. Colabianchi,et al.  Identifying accelerometer nonwear and wear time in older adults , 2013, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[7]  R. Heidel,et al.  Reducing the Health Consequences of Smoking: 25 Years of Progress. A Report of the Surgeon General. , 1989 .

[8]  Usdhhs Physical Activity and Health: A Report of the Surgeon General , 1996 .

[9]  I-Min Lee,et al.  Impact of accelerometer data processing decisions on the sample size, wear time and physical activity level of a large cohort study , 2014, BMC Public Health.

[10]  L. Mâsse,et al.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[11]  Alejandro Santos-Lozano,et al.  Technical variability of the GT3X accelerometer. , 2012, Medical engineering & physics.

[12]  Adrian Bauman,et al.  Accelerometer-based measures in physical activity surveillance: current practices and issues , 2014, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[13]  R. Davey,et al.  Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study , 2016, The Lancet.

[14]  Gavin Kennedy,et al.  24 h Accelerometry: impact of sleep-screening methods on estimates of sedentary behaviour and physical activity while awake , 2016, Journal of sports sciences.

[15]  M. Pearce,et al.  Objective measurement of sedentary behavior: impact of non-wear time rules on changes in sedentary time , 2015, BMC Public Health.

[16]  Wolfgang Ahrens,et al.  The German National Cohort: Aims, study des , 2014 .

[17]  Leena Choi,et al.  Assessment of wear/nonwear time classification algorithms for triaxial accelerometer. , 2012, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[18]  Wendy J Brown,et al.  ActiGraph GT3X+ cut-points for identifying sedentary behaviour in older adults in free-living environments. , 2014, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[19]  Ulf Ekelund,et al.  Assessment of physical activity – a review of methodologies with reference to epidemiological research: a report of the exercise physiology section of the European Association of Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation , 2010, European journal of cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation : official journal of the European Society of Cardiology, Working Groups on Epidemiology & Prevention and Cardiac Rehabilitation and Exercise Physiology.

[20]  G. Bergström,et al.  SCAPIS Pilot Study: Sitness, Fitness and Fatness - Is Sedentary Time Substitution by Physical Activity Equally Important for Everyone's Markers of Glucose Regulation? , 2016, Journal of physical activity & health.

[21]  Olivier Dieu,et al.  Physical activity using wrist‐worn accelerometers: comparison of dominant and non‐dominant wrist , 2017, Clinical physiology and functional imaging.

[22]  Peter Dalgaard,et al.  R Development Core Team (2010): R: A language and environment for statistical computing , 2010 .

[23]  Maria Hagströmer,et al.  The repeatability and validity of questionnaires assessing occupational physical activity--a systematic review. , 2011, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[24]  Eivind Aadland,et al.  Reliability of the Actigraph GT3X+ Accelerometer in Adults under Free-Living Conditions , 2015, PloS one.

[25]  Melody Oliver,et al.  Identification of Accelerometer Nonwear Time and Sedentary Behavior , 2011, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[26]  Wendy J Brown,et al.  Is the pain of activity log-books worth the gain in precision when distinguishing wear and non-wear time for tri-axial accelerometers? , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[27]  A. Peters,et al.  Physical activity levels, duration pattern and adherence to WHO recommendations in German adults , 2017, PloS one.

[28]  N. Wareham,et al.  Objective Sedentary Time, Moderate-to-Vigorous Physical Activity, and Physical Capability in a British Cohort , 2016, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[29]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[30]  M. Tremblay,et al.  A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review , 2008, The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity.

[31]  P. Freedson,et al.  Amount of time spent in sedentary behaviors in the United States, 2003-2004. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[32]  R Holle,et al.  KORA - A Research Platform for Population Based Health Research , 2005, Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)).