Barriers and strategies for the clinical translation of advanced orthopaedic tissue engineering protocols.

Research in orthopaedic tissue engineering has intensified over the last decade and new protocols continue to emerge. The clinical translation of these new applications, however, remains associated with a number of obstacles. This report highlights the major issues that impede the clinical translation of advanced tissue engineering concepts, discusses strategies to overcome these barriers, and examines the need to increase incentives for translational strategies. The statements are based on presentations and discussions held at the AO Foundation-sponsored symposium "Where Science meets Clinics 2013" held at the Congress Center in Davos, Switzerland, in September, 2013. The event organisers convened a diverse group of over one hundred stakeholders involved in clinical translation of orthopaedic tissue engineering, including scientists, clinicians, healthcare industry professionals and regulatory agency representatives. A major point that emerged from the discussions was that there continues to be a critical need for early trans-disciplinary communication and collaboration in the development and execution of research approaches. Equally importantly was the need to address the shortage of sustained funding programs for multidisciplinary teams conducting translational research. Such detailed discussions between experts contribute towards the development of a roadmap to more successfully advance the clinical translation of novel tissue engineering concepts and ultimately improve patient care in orthopaedic and trauma surgery.

[1]  Maurice E. M Ler Lessons of 30 Years of Total Hip Arthroplasty , 1992 .

[2]  C. Ohlsson,et al.  Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  R. Rosier Institutional barriers to the orthopaedic clinician-scientist. , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  T. Einhorn Funding the mandate for the orthopaedic clinician scientist. , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  S. Perren The Evolution of Our Understanding , 2008 .

[6]  S. Perren Fracture healing. The evolution of our understanding. , 2008, Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca.

[7]  J. Bernstein,et al.  The future of the orthopaedic clinician-scientist. Part I: The potential role of MD-PhD students considering orthopaedic surgery. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  M. Brittberg … more bricks to the building of cartilage knowledge? , 2009, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[9]  E. Hunziker The Elusive Path to Cartilage Regeneration , 2009, Advanced materials.

[10]  Robert Zorec,et al.  Challenges with advanced therapy medicinal products and how to meet them , 2010, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[11]  S. Halpern,et al.  The future of the orthopaedic clinician-scientist: part II: Identification of factors that may influence orthopaedic residents' intent to perform research. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  C. Evans Gene therapy for bone healing , 2010, Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine.

[13]  P. Robbins,et al.  Getting arthritis gene therapy into the clinic , 2011, Nature Reviews Rheumatology.

[14]  M. Büchler,et al.  Scientific evaluation of modern clinical research: we need a new currency! , 2011, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[15]  S. Ghivizzani,et al.  Orthopedic gene therapy—lost in translation? , 2012, Journal of cellular physiology.

[16]  H. Madry,et al.  Advances and challenges in gene‐based approaches for osteoarthritis , 2013, The journal of gene medicine.

[17]  Farshid Guilak,et al.  Tissue engineering for articular cartilage repair--the state of the art. , 2013, European cells & materials.

[18]  A. Rey-Rico,et al.  Transforming growth factor Beta-releasing scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering. , 2014, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.