Optimizing image-based patterned defect inspection through FDTD simulations at multiple ultraviolet wavelengths

The sizes of non-negligible defects in the patterning of a semiconductor device continue to decrease as the dimensions for these devices are reduced. These “killer defects” disrupt the performance of the device and must be adequately controlled during manufacturing, and new solutions are required to improve optics-based defect inspection. To this end, our group has reported [Barnes et al., Proc. SPIE 1014516 (2017)] our initial five-wavelength simulation study, evaluating the extensibility of defect inspection by reducing the inspection wavelength from a deep-ultraviolet wavelength to wavelengths in the vacuum ultraviolet and the extreme ultraviolet. In that study, a 47 nm wavelength yielded enhancements in the signal to noise (SNR) by a factor of five compared to longer wavelengths and in the differential intensities by as much as three orders-of-magnitude compared to 13 nm. This paper briefly reviews these recent findings and investigates the possible sources for these disparities between results at 13 nm and 47 nm wavelengths. Our in-house finite-difference time-domain code (FDTD) is tested in both two and three dimensions to determine how computational conditions contributed to the results. A modified geometry and materials stack is presented that offers a second viewpoint of defect detectability as functions of wavelength, polarization, and defect type. Reapplication of the initial SNR-based defect metric again yields no detection of a defect at λ = 13 nm, but additional image preprocessing now enables the computation of the SNR for λ = 13 nm simulated images and has led to a revised defect metric that allows comparisons at all five wavelengths.

[1]  Angelo Giglia,et al.  Dispersion model for optical thin films applicable in wide spectral range , 2015, SPIE Optical Systems Design.

[2]  Sadao Adachi,et al.  a-Silicon (a-Si) , 1999 .

[3]  Michael I. Mishchenko,et al.  Gustav Mie and the fundamental concept of electromagnetic scattering by particles: A perspective , 2009 .

[4]  Mark Y. Liu,et al.  A 14nm logic technology featuring 2nd-generation FinFET, air-gapped interconnects, self-aligned double patterning and a 0.0588 µm2 SRAM cell size , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting.

[5]  刘其军,et al.  Structural, electronic, optical, elastic properties and Born effective charges of monoclinic HfO2 from first-principles calculations , 2014 .

[6]  Elena O. Filatova,et al.  Optical constants of crystalline HfO2 for energy range 140―930 eV , 2010 .

[7]  H. R. Philipp,et al.  Silicon Dioxide (SiO2), Type α (Crystalline) , 1997 .

[8]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Application of the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method to Sinusoidal Steady-State Electromagnetic-Penetration Problems , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[9]  Alok Vaid,et al.  Metrology capabilities and needs for 7nm and 5nm logic nodes , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[10]  Martin Y. Sohn,et al.  Assessing the wavelength extensibility of optical patterned defect inspection , 2017, Advanced Lithography.

[11]  Hui Zhou,et al.  Effects of wafer noise on the detection of 20-nm defects using optical volumetric inspection , 2015 .

[12]  Martin Y. Sohn,et al.  Enhancing 9 nm node dense patterned defect optical inspection using polarization, angle, and focus , 2013, Advanced Lithography.

[13]  Timothy F. Crimmins Defect metrology challenges at the 11-nm node and beyond , 2010, Advanced Lithography.

[14]  John G. Hartley,et al.  13nm gate Intentional Defect Array (IDA) wafer patterning by e-beam lithography for defect metrology evaluation , 2011 .

[15]  H. Piller,et al.  Silicon (Amorphous) (a-Si) , 1997 .

[16]  Z. Liu,et al.  Structural, electronic, optical, elastic properties and Born effective charges of monoclinic HfO2 from first-principles calculations , 2014 .