Investigating Homophily in Online Social Networks

Similarity breeds connections, the principle of homophily, has been well studied in existing sociology literature. %Several studies have observed this phenomena by conducting surveys on human subjects. These studies have concluded that new ties are formed between similar individuals. This phenomenon has been used to explain several socio-psychological concepts such as segregation, community development, social mobility, etc. However, due to the nature of these studies and limitations because of involvement of human subjects, conclusions from these studies are not easily extensible in online social media. %Social media, which is becoming the infinite space for interactions, has exceeded all the expectations in terms of growth, for reasons beyond human mind. New ties are formed in social media just like the way they emerge in real-world. However, given the differences between real-world and online social media, do the same factors that govern the construction of new ties in real-world also govern the construction of new ties in social media? In other words, does homophily exist in social media? In this article, we study this extremely significant question. We propose a systematic approach by studying two online social media sites, BlogCatalog and Last.fm and report our findings along with some interesting observations.

[1]  M E J Newman,et al.  Community structure in social and biological networks , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis , 1964 .

[3]  Jaana Kekäläinen,et al.  Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.

[4]  Morroe Berger,et al.  Freedom and control in modern society , 1954 .

[5]  Ferenc Bodon,et al.  A fast APRIORI implementation , 2003, FIMI.

[6]  D. Hoyt,et al.  Adult Kinship Networks: The Selective Formation of Intimate Ties with Kin , 1983 .

[7]  M. McPherson,et al.  Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks , 2001 .

[8]  M. Newman,et al.  Finding community structure in very large networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Eric Gilbert,et al.  Predicting tie strength with social media , 2009, CHI.

[10]  Inderjit S. Dhillon,et al.  Weighted Graph Cuts without Eigenvectors A Multilevel Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[11]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities , 2008, KDD.

[12]  L. Verbrugge The Structure of Adult Friendship Choices , 1977 .

[13]  Ying Zhou,et al.  Community discovery and analysis in blogspace , 2006, WWW '06.

[14]  Matthew Richardson,et al.  Yes, there is a correlation: - from social networks to personal behavior on the web , 2008, WWW.

[15]  Huan Liu,et al.  Synthesis Lectures on Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery , 2009 .

[16]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Friends and neighbors on the Web , 2003, Soc. Networks.

[17]  Yun Chi,et al.  Blog Community Discovery and Evolution Based on Mutual Awareness Expansion , 2007, IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI'07).

[18]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  On the Bursty Evolution of Blogspace , 2003, WWW '03.