Comparison of antemortem antimicrobial treatment regimens to antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of postmortem lung isolates from feedlot cattle with bronchopneumonia

A retrospective study was performed to compare the treatment regimens in feedlot cattle that died with bovine respiratory disease (BRD) to the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of the microorganisms isolated from lungs. Forty-three cattle submitted by the Willard Sparks Beef Research Center (WSBRC) to the Oklahoma Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory for postmortem examination during 2007 had bronchopneumonia (acute = 16, subacute = 5, or chronic = 22). Lungs from cattle were cultured aerobically (40 cattle) and for Mycoplasma spp. (34 cattle). Susceptibility panels were performed. At least 1 BRD pathogen (Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, Mycoplasma bovis, or Arcanobacterium pyogenes) was isolated from 39 cattle, and 77% (30/39) had multiple organisms recovered. Mycoplasmal infections were common (25/34) and a major component of mixed infections (24/25). The majority (60%) of the M. haemolytica, P. multocida, and H. somni isolates were resistant to tetracycline. Most of the H. somni isolates (67%) were susceptible to tilmicosin (Ti), enrofloxacin (En), ceftiofur (Ce), and florfenicol, despite extensive treatment with Ti, En, and Ce (75% of isolates were from cattle that received each antimicrobial once). Most of the M. haemolytica (65%) and P. multocida (79%) isolates were susceptible to En and Ce, despite antemortem treatment of cattle with these antimicrobials. Hence, the current study reports a discrepancy between the antemortem treatment of clinical BRD and the susceptibility patterns of the bacteria isolated from lungs postmortem. Based on these findings, factors other than antimicrobial resistance are playing a role in the death of feedlot cattle with BRD.

[1]  M. Apley Bovine respiratory disease: pathogenesis, clinical signs, and treatment in lightweight calves. , 2006, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[2]  M. Payton,et al.  Lung Pathology and Infectious Agents in Fatal Feedlot Pneumonias and Relationship with Mortality, Disease Onset, and Treatments , 2009, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[3]  S. Abutarbush,et al.  Microbiological and histopathological findings in cases of fatal bovine respiratory disease of feedlot cattle in Western Canada. , 2008, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[4]  M. Galyean,et al.  BOARD-INVITED REVIEW: Recent advances in management of highly stressed, newly received feedlot cattle , 2007, Journal of animal science.

[5]  D. Griffin,et al.  Economic impact associated with respiratory disease in beef cattle. , 1997, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[6]  S. Martin,et al.  The frequency, distribution and effects of antibodies, to seven putative respiratory pathogens, on respiratory disease and weight gain in feedlot calves in Ontario. , 1989, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[7]  M. Galyean,et al.  Interaction of cattle health/immunity and nutrition. , 1999, Journal of animal science.

[8]  M. Archambault,et al.  Diseases and Pathogens Associated with Mortality in Ontario Beef Feedlots , 2006, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[9]  L. Lillie,et al.  The bovine respiratory disease complex. , 1974, The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne.

[10]  M. Payton,et al.  Isolation and Antimicrobial Susceptibilities of Bacterial Pathogens from Bovine Pneumonia: 1994–2002 , 2004, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[11]  M. Apley Ancillary therapy of bovine respiratory disease. , 1997, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[12]  J. Saliki,et al.  Bovine viral diarrhea viral infections in feeder calves with respiratory disease: interactions with Pasteurella spp., parainfluenza-3 virus, and bovine respiratory syncytial virus. , 2000, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[13]  A. Confer Update on bacterial pathogenesis in BRD , 2009, Animal Health Research Reviews.

[14]  D. Mosier Bacterial pneumonia. , 1997, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[15]  E. Nagy,et al.  Serological titers to bovine herpesvirus 1, bovine viral diarrhea virus, parainfluenza 3 virus, bovine respiratory syncytial virus and Pasteurella haemolytica in feedlot calves with respiratory disease: associations with bacteriological and pulmonary cytological variables. , 1992, Canadian journal of veterinary research = Revue canadienne de recherche veterinaire.

[16]  A. Confer,et al.  Pasteurella multocida and bovine respiratory disease , 2007, Animal Health Research Reviews.

[17]  P M V Cusack,et al.  The medicine and epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease in feedlots. , 2003, Australian veterinary journal.

[18]  M. Apley Susceptibility testing for bovine respiratory and enteric disease. , 2003, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Food animal practice.

[19]  D. Call,et al.  Antimicrobial resistance in beef and dairy cattle production , 2008, Animal Health Research Reviews.