The Internet of Things and Next-generation Public Health Information Systems

The Internet of things has particularly novel implications in the area of public health. This is due to (1) The rapid and widespread adoption of powerful contemporary Smartphone’s; (2) The increasing availability and use of health and fitness sensors, wearable sensor patches, smart watches, wireless-enabled digital tattoos and ambient sensors; and (3) The nature of public health to implicitly involve connectivity with and the acquisition of data in relation to large numbers of individuals up to population scale. Of particular relevance in relation to the Internet of Things (IoT) and public health is the need for privacy and anonymity of users. It should be noted that IoT capabilities are not inconsistent with maintaining privacy, due to the focus of public health on aggregate data not individual data and broad public health interventions. In addition, public health information systems utilizing IoT capabilities can be constructed to specifically ensure privacy, security and anonymity, as has been developed and evaluated in this work. In this paper we describe the particular characteristics of the IoT that can play a role in enabling emerging public health capabilities; we describe a privacy-preserving IoT-based public health information system architecture; and provide a privacy evaluation.

[1]  A. Clarke,et al.  Secure and Reliable Distributed Health Records: Achieving Query Assurance across Repositories of Encrypted Health Data , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[2]  D. Warburton,et al.  Health benefits of physical activity: the evidence , 2006, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[3]  Robert Steele,et al.  An Overview of the State of the Art of Automated Capture of Dietary Intake Information , 2015, Critical reviews in food science and nutrition.

[4]  Robert Steele,et al.  Social media, mobile devices and sensors: Categorizing new techniques for health communication , 2011, 2011 Fifth International Conference on Sensing Technology.

[5]  Melanie Swan,et al.  Sensor Mania! The Internet of Things, Wearable Computing, Objective Metrics, and the Quantified Self 2.0 , 2012, J. Sens. Actuator Networks.

[6]  Christine Louise Outram,et al.  The Copenhagen Wheel: An innovative electric bicycle system that harnesses the power of real-time information and crowd sourcing , 2010 .

[7]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Healthcare in the pocket: Mapping the space of mobile-phone health interventions , 2012, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[8]  Robert Steele,et al.  Health participatory sensing networks , 2014, Mob. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Biomedical component of the Australian Health Survey : Public health objectives , 2011 .

[10]  Robert Steele,et al.  Elderly persons' perception and acceptance of using wireless sensor networks to assist healthcare , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Erik P. de Vink,et al.  A Formalization of Anonymity and Onion Routing , 2004, ESORICS.

[12]  Radha Poovendran,et al.  A Survey on Mix Networks and Their Secure Applications , 2006, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[13]  Robert Steele,et al.  Summarized data to achieve population-wide anonymized wellness measures , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  Tim Furche,et al.  Spatial k-Anonymity , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.