Classification of single-trial ERP sub-types: application of globally optimal vector quantization using simulated annealing.

Examination of the single trials which are traditionally averaged to form late-component ERPs reveals a number of different sub-types of response. This study introduces an automated and robust approach to objectively classify these ERP sub-types. Auditory oddball ERP (target tones) data were examined in 25 normal subjects. Globally optimal vector quantization using simulated annealing (the "Metropolis algorithm") was employed to determine the natural groupings of the single-trial responses that constitute the average ERP. No prior assumptions about the ERP patterns were imposed. This is the first study to employ a cluster analysis technique with globally optimal properties in ERP research. We demonstrate that, due to the presence of many different undesirable local minima, a globally optimal solution is crucial if the classification of the single-trial ERPs is to reflect their real structure. The results of this study showed that only around 40% of single trials had a morphology which resembled the averaged ERP wave form. The remaining single trials had a response morphology which was different from the average, in terms of the amplitude and latency of the components. Single-trial ERP response sub-types may provide fundamental complementary functional information to the ERP average.

[1]  R. Gray,et al.  Vector quantization , 1984, IEEE ASSP Magazine.

[2]  Allen Gersho,et al.  Competitive learning and soft competition for vector quantizer design , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[3]  E Hunt,et al.  Mathematical models of the event-related potential. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[4]  A Pfefferbaum,et al.  Event-related potentials in schizophrenics. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Christopher Kessier,et al.  Evoked potential variation in schizophrenic subgroups , 1989, Biological Psychiatry.

[6]  E. Gordon,et al.  Measurement of maximum variability within event related potentials in schizophrenia , 1991, Psychiatry Research.

[7]  Antoine Rémond,et al.  Methods of Analysis of Brain Electrical and Magnetic Signals , 1987 .

[8]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in FORTRAN - The Art of Scientific Computing, 2nd Edition , 1987 .

[9]  Allen Gersho,et al.  Globally optimal vector quantizer design by stochastic relaxation , 1992, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[10]  J. Ford,et al.  Schizophrenics have fewer and smaller P300s: A single-trial analysis , 1994, Biological Psychiatry.

[11]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[12]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[13]  D. Childers,et al.  Event-related potentials: a critical review of methods for single-trial detection. , 1987, Critical reviews in biomedical engineering.

[14]  J. Blom,et al.  An electrode cap tested. , 1982, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.