Development of a Learning Progression for the Formation of the Solar System

This study describes the process of defining a hypothetical learning progression (LP) for astronomy around the big idea of Solar System formation. At the most sophisticated level, students can explain how the formation process led to the current Solar System by considering how the planets formed from the collapse of a rotating cloud of gas and dust. Development of this LP was conducted in 2 phases. First, we interviewed middle school, high school, and college students (N = 44), asking them to describe properties of the current Solar System and to explain how the Solar System was formed. Second, we interviewed 6th-grade students (N = 24) before and after a 15-week astronomy curriculum designed around the big idea. Our analysis provides evidence for potential levels of sophistication within the hypothetical LP, while also revealing common alternative conceptions or areas of limited understanding that could form barriers to progress if not addressed by instruction. For example, many students' understanding of Solar System phenomena was limited by either alternative ideas about gravity or limited application of momentum in their explanations. Few students approached a scientific-level explanation, but their responses revealed possible stepping stones that could be built upon with appropriate instruction.

[1]  Ineke Henze,et al.  Development of Experienced Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Models of the Solar System and the Universe , 2008, Science Teachers’ Knowledge Development.

[2]  Julia D. Plummer,et al.  Building a learning progression for celestial motion: An exploration of students' reasoning about the seasons , 2014 .

[3]  Julia D. Plummer,et al.  Planetary Properties: A Systems Perspective , 2014 .

[4]  Yue Yin,et al.  Using Formal Embedded Formative Assessments Aligned with a Short-Term Learning Progression to Promote Conceptual Change and Achievement in Science , 2014 .

[5]  Robert L. Mayes,et al.  Quantitative Reasoning in Environmental Science: A learning progression , 2014 .

[6]  Julia D. Plummer,et al.  Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy learning progression , 2014 .

[7]  Hui Jin,et al.  Using Ideas from the History of Science and Linguistics to Develop a Learning Progression for Energy in Socio-ecological Systems , 2014 .

[8]  K. Halkia,et al.  The Use of Thought Experiments in Teaching Physics to Upper Secondary-Level Students: Two examples from the theory of relativity , 2013 .

[9]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[10]  D. Uttal,et al.  The malleability of spatial skills: a meta-analysis of training studies. , 2013, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  Ravit Golan Duncan,et al.  From Theory to Data: The Process of Refining Learning Progressions , 2013 .

[12]  Ngss Lead States Next generation science standards : for states, by states , 2013 .

[13]  R. Peterson Supporting Grade 5-8 Students in Constructing Explanations in Science , 2012 .

[14]  S. Willoughby,et al.  Student Understanding of Gravity in Introductory College Astronomy. , 2012 .

[15]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  A learning progression for water in socio‐ecological systems , 2012 .

[16]  David A. Gillam,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2012 .

[17]  London Economies The Impact of Three , 2012 .

[18]  C. Kelley,et al.  CONSORTIUM FOR POLICY RESEARCH IN EDUCATION , 2012 .

[19]  J. Plummer Challenges in Defining and Validating an Astronomy Learning Progression , 2012 .

[20]  Aaron Rogat Developing Learning Progressions in Support of the New Science Standards: A RAPID Workshop Series. , 2011 .

[21]  Joseph Krajcik Learning Progressions Provide Road Maps for the Development and Validity of Assessments and Curriculum Materials , 2011 .

[22]  Julia D. Plummer,et al.  Covering the Standards: Astronomy Teachers' Preparation and Beliefs. , 2010 .

[23]  KaChun Yu,et al.  Student Ideas about Kepler's Laws and Planetary Orbital Motions. , 2010 .

[24]  Cibelle Celestino Silva,et al.  Daytime School Guided Visits to an Astronomical Observatory in Brazil , 2010 .

[25]  M. Rollnick,et al.  Big Ideas: A review of astronomy education research 1974–2008 , 2010 .

[26]  Joseph Krajcik,et al.  Building a learning progression for celestial motion: Elementary levels from an earth‐based perspective , 2010 .

[27]  E. Prather,et al.  College Students' Preinstructional Ideas About Stars and Star Formation , 2009 .

[28]  D. Lubinski,et al.  Spatial ability for STEM domains: Aligning over 50 years of cumulative psychological knowledge solidifies its importance. , 2009 .

[29]  Ben Kelcey,et al.  How and when does complex reasoning occur? Empirically driven development of a learning progression focused on complex reasoning about biodiversity , 2009 .

[30]  Mark Wilson,et al.  Measuring Progressions: Assessment Structures Underlying a Learning Progression , 2009 .

[31]  Aaron Rogat,et al.  Learning Progressions in Science: An Evidence-Based Approach to Reform. CPRE Research Report # RR-63. , 2009 .

[32]  K. Crowley,et al.  From Everyday to Scientific Observation: How Children Learn to Observe the Biologist’s World , 2009 .

[33]  H. Schweingruber,et al.  TAKING SCIENCE TO SCHOOL: LEARNING AND TEACHING SCIENCE IN GRADES K-8 , 2007 .

[34]  C. Kavanagh,et al.  Learning about Gravity II. Trajectories and Orbits: A Guide for Teachers and Curriculum Developers. , 2006 .

[35]  C. W. Anderson,et al.  FOCUS ARTICLE: Implications of Research on Children's Learning for Standards and Assessment: A Proposed Learning Progression for Matter and the Atomic-Molecular Theory , 2006 .

[36]  John Sharp,et al.  Children's Ideas about the Solar System and the Chaos in Learning Science. , 2006 .

[37]  T. Mueller Learning to Think Spatially , 2006 .

[38]  Mark Wilson,et al.  Constructing Measures: An Item Response Modeling Approach , 2004 .

[39]  James MaKinster,et al.  The impact of three‐dimensional computational modeling on student understanding of astronomy concepts: a qualitative analysis , 2004 .

[40]  Michael Barnett,et al.  The impact of three‐dimensional computational modeling on student understanding of astronomical concepts: a quantitative analysis , 2004 .

[41]  L. Agan Stellar Ideas: Exploring Students' Understanding of Stars. , 2004 .

[42]  James W. Pellegrino,et al.  Knowing What Students Know. , 2003 .

[43]  Jo Ellen Roseman,et al.  How well do middle school science programs measure up? Findings from Project 2061's curriculum review , 2002 .

[44]  Timothy F. Slater,et al.  Hints of a Fundamental Misconception in Cosmology , 2002 .

[45]  J. Mathewson Visual-spatial thinking: An aspect of science overlooked by educators , 1999 .

[46]  Mariko Suzuki JAPANESE CHILDREN'S IDEAS OF THE SOLAR SYSTEM , 1998 .

[47]  J. Sharp Children's astronomical beliefs: a preliminary study of Year 6 children in south‐west England , 1996 .

[48]  J. Lagowski National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[49]  J. Shea National Science Education Standards , 1995 .

[50]  D. Treagust,et al.  Secondary Students' Understanding of Gravity and the Motion of Planets. , 1989 .