Does the Chinese airline network become more robust over time?

Currently, China has the fastest growing air transportation market in the world. Resilience to external events is critical to ensure an efficient and reliable transportation of passengers. This study investigates the robustness of the Chinese airline network under disruptions at their critical airports as well as the evolution of the networks' robustness from the year 2010 to 2015. Among the 24 Chinese airline networks in our study, we find that the topological properties of the networks differ significantly for these airlines. Each airline has its own few dominating hubs, where the number of hubs varies among airlines. Analysis of the robustness for the 24 Chinese airline networks show that they are quite robust against random failures, but the networks disintegrate quickly under targeted attacks. Evolutionary analysis of the robustness on a monthly resolution from 2010 to 2015 showed that the robustness does not change significantly over time for individual airline network, although the robustness measure R values vary for different airlines. This shows that the ongoing efforts to increase the resilience should be adjusted to better meet future needs for more reliable transportation. Our work contributes to a better understanding of the Chinese air transportation systems.

[1]  H. Herrmann,et al.  Critical Cooperation Range to Improve Spatial Network Robustness , 2014, PloS one.

[2]  Peng Wei,et al.  Weighted Algebraic Connectivity: An Application to Airport Transportation Network , 2011 .

[3]  Mark Hansen,et al.  Multiple airport regions based on inter-airport temporal distances , 2017 .

[4]  Dengfeng Sun,et al.  Algebraic Connectivity Maximization for Air Transportation Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[5]  Massimiliano Zanin,et al.  Modeling the multi-layer nature of the European Air Transport Network: Resilience and passengers re-scheduling under random failures , 2012, ArXiv.

[6]  Volker Gollnick,et al.  Robustness analysis metrics for worldwide airport network: A comprehensive study , 2017 .

[7]  Soumen Roy,et al.  Resilience and rewiring of the passenger airline networks in the United States. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[8]  Hans J. Herrmann,et al.  Mitigation of malicious attacks on networks , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[9]  Xiaoqian Sun,et al.  Worldwide Railway Skeleton Network: Extraction Methodology and Preliminary Analysis , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[10]  Dengfeng Sun,et al.  Algebraic connectivity maximization of an air transportation network: The flight routes' addition/deletion problem , 2012 .

[11]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Evolution of domestic airport networks: a review and comparative analysis , 2019 .

[12]  Lu Wang,et al.  Evolution trends of the network structure of Spring Airlines in China: A temporal and spatial analysis , 2017 .

[13]  Florian Linke,et al.  On the topology of air navigation route systems , 2017 .

[14]  Hans J. Herrmann,et al.  Revealing the structure of the world airline network , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Massimiliano Zanin,et al.  QRE: Quick Robustness Estimation for large complex networks , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..