New Techniques and MIS: The Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws—Indications and Limits

Cortical bone trajectory (CBT) takes divergent and caudocephalad screw path through the pedicle and differs widely from the traditional transpedicular trajectory. The most important advantage of CBT is to maximize the contact between screw thread and cortical bone. Biomechanical studies have shown greater anchoring ability of CBT compared with that of the traditional trajectory. Furthermore, the entry point for CBT requires less soft tissue dissection; thus, these features make the CBT technique attractive for use as a new minimally invasive method for spinal fusion. Clinical studies using the CBT technique demonstrated similar clinical and radiologic outcomes with lower surgical morbidity compared with those using the traditional technique. Meanwhile, it is notable that this technique is not without specific concerns for clinical use due to its own surgical technique, lack of convergence, and short screw length. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of the current literature on CBT, with focus on indications, limits, and surgical pitfalls.

[1]  Tait S. Smith,et al.  Characteristics of pedicle screw loading. Effect of surgical technique on intravertebral and intrapedicular bending moments. , 1999, Spine.

[2]  T. Asazuma,et al.  In Vivo Analysis of Insertional Torque During Pedicle Screwing Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique , 2014, Spine.

[3]  N. Hosogane,et al.  Evaluation of the Fixation Strength of Pedicle Screws Using Cortical Bone Trajectory: What Is the Ideal Trajectory for Optimal Fixation? , 2015, Spine.

[4]  B. Jiang,et al.  Accurate Determination of Isthmus of Lumbar Pedicle: A Morphometric Study using Reformatted Computed Tomographic Images , 2004, Spine.

[5]  M. Helgeson,et al.  Does Superior-Segment Facet Violation or Laminectomy Destabilize the Adjacent Level in Lumbar Transpedicular Fixation?: An In Vitro Human Cadaveric Assessment , 2008, Spine.

[6]  J. Street,et al.  Early clinical results with cortically based pedicle screw trajectory for fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine , 2015, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[7]  T. Asazuma,et al.  Morphometric Measurement of Cortical Bone Trajectory for Lumbar Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Computed Tomography , 2013, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[8]  K. Chiba,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of lumbar pedicle screws in spondylolytic vertebrae: comparison of fixation strength between the traditional trajectory and a cortical bone trajectory. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[9]  Howard S. An,et al.  Biomechanical Evaluation of Diagonal Fixation in Pedicle Screw Instrumentation , 2001, Spine.

[10]  O. Danisa,et al.  Early complications after instrumentation of the lumbar spine using cortical bone trajectory technique , 2016, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Puttlitz,et al.  Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws. , 2009, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[12]  J. Tan,et al.  The Effect of Interbody Cage Positioning on Lumbosacral Vertebral Endplate Failure in Compression , 2005, Spine.

[13]  T. Wilson,et al.  Cortical screw trajectory for instrumentation and fusion in the setting of osteopathic compression fracture allows for percutaneous kyphoplasty for adjacent level compression fractures , 2015, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[14]  K. Bachus,et al.  Cortical screws used to rescue failed lumbar pedicle screw construct: a biomechanical analysis. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[15]  O. Danisa,et al.  Pars and pedicle fracture and screw loosening associated with cortical bone trajectory: a case series and proposed mechanism through a cadaveric study. , 2016, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[16]  T. Washio,et al.  Structural Characteristics of the Pedicle and Its Role in Screw Stability , 1997, Spine.

[17]  Alpesh A. Patel,et al.  Differences in bone mineral density of fixation points between lumbar cortical and traditional pedicle screws. , 2016, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[18]  K. Chiba,et al.  Incidence and Risk Factors of Adjacent Cranial Facet Joint Violation Following Pedicle Screw Insertion Using Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique , 2016, Spine.

[19]  Choll W. Kim,et al.  Nerve Injury to the Posterior Rami Medial Branch During the Insertion of Pedicle Screws: Comparison of Mini-Open Versus Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Insertion Techniques , 2009, Spine.

[20]  B. Weiner,et al.  The Lateral Buttress: An Anatomic Feature of the Lumbar Pars Interarticularis , 2002, Spine.

[21]  Hironobu Sakaura,et al.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion using traditional pedicle screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: a comparative study. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[22]  C. Chaput,et al.  Treatment of Spinal Conditions in Young Adults: Cortical Lumbar Screw Techniques , 2015 .

[23]  K. Uchida,et al.  Should we use cortical bone screws for cortical bone trajectory? , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[24]  N. Khanna,et al.  Medialized, Muscle-Splitting Approach for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Technique and Multicenter Perioperative Results , 2016, Spine.

[25]  Che-Wei Hung,et al.  Comparison of multifidus muscle atrophy after posterior lumbar interbody fusion with conventional and cortical bone trajectory , 2016, Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery.

[26]  L. Lenke,et al.  The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine. , 2012, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[27]  V. Goel,et al.  The Effect of Removing the Lateral Part of the Pars Interarticularis on Stress Distribution at the Neural Arch in Lumbar Foraminal Microdecompression at L3–L4 and L4–L5: Anatomic and Finite Element Investigations , 2007, Spine.

[28]  Ho-Joong Kim,et al.  The comparison of pedicle screw and cortical screw in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective randomized noninferiority trial. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[29]  K. Nishizawa,et al.  Short-Term Clinical Result of Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique for the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis with More than 1-Year Follow-Up , 2016, Asian spine journal.

[30]  Ho-Joong Kim,et al.  The Biomechanical Effect of Pedicle Screws' Insertion Angle and Position on the Superior Adjacent Segment in 1 Segment Lumbar Fusion , 2012, Spine.

[31]  T. Yoshimine,et al.  Clear Zone Formation around Screws in the Early Postoperative Stages after Posterior Lumbar Fusion Using the Cortical Bone Trajectory Technique , 2015, Asian spine journal.

[32]  Yoshiomi Kobayashi,et al.  Cortical bone trajectory and traditional trajectory—a radiological evaluation of screw-bone contact , 2015, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[33]  N. Hosogane,et al.  Cortical Bone Trajectory for Thoracic Pedicle Screws: A Technical Note , 2014, Clinical spine surgery.

[34]  N. Hosogane,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of the fixation strength of lumbar pedicle screws using cortical bone trajectory: a finite element study. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[35]  T. Asazuma,et al.  Cortical bone trajectory for lumbosacral fixation: penetrating S-1 endplate screw technique: technical note. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[36]  B. Cunningham,et al.  Biomechanical fixation properties of cortical versus transpedicular screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine: an in vitro human cadaveric model. , 2016, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[37]  K. Chiba,et al.  Biomechanical evaluation of fixation strength among different sizes of pedicle screws using the cortical bone trajectory: what is the ideal screw size for optimal fixation? , 2016, Acta Neurochirurgica.

[38]  A. Patwardhan,et al.  Effect of Physiological Loads on Cortical and Traditional Pedicle Screw Fixation , 2014, Spine.

[39]  Ali Kiapour,et al.  Biomechanical Analysis of Various Footprints of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Devices , 2014, Journal of spinal disorders & techniques.

[40]  M. Hongo,et al.  Short-Term Results of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Pedicle Screw with Cortical Bone Trajectory Compared with Conventional Trajectory , 2015, Asian spine journal.

[41]  N. Crawford,et al.  Biomechanics of Lumbar Cortical Screw–Rod Fixation Versus Pedicle Screw–Rod Fixation With and Without Interbody Support , 2013, Spine.

[42]  R-M Lin,et al.  Biomechanical investigation of pedicle screw-vertebrae complex: a finite element approach using bonded and contact interface conditions. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[43]  C. Puttlitz,et al.  Pedicle screw placement in the lumbar spine: effect of trajectory and screw design on acute biomechanical purchase. , 2015, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[44]  A. Rohlmann,et al.  Influence of graded facetectomy and laminectomy on spinal biomechanics , 2003, European Spine Journal.