Dental Shape Match Rates in Selected and Orthodontically Treated Populations in New York State: A Two‐dimensional Study *

Abstract:  Forensically identifying a suspect’s dentition from a bitemark in an open population requires the supposition that every person’s dental alignment is different. There have been few studies that have tested this claim. Four hundred and ten lower anterior dentitions from a selected population and 110 lower anterior dentitions from one that was orthodontically treated were measured using geometric morphometric analysis, allowing comparison of arch shape. Dental match rates of 1.46% and 42.7% of individuals were found in the respective populations, given an established measurement error. Orthodontic treatment had a strong effect on match rate suggesting that treated or naturally well‐aligned dentitions may be indistinguishable. Sexual dimorphism was found to be only slightly significant. Principal shape variation in both populations was degree of arch curvature. Results of studying these populations show that dental matches can occur, and that statements of certainty concerning individualization in such populations should be approached with caution.

[1]  M. Foote Nearest-Neighbor Analysis of Trilobite Morphospace , 1990 .

[2]  Mary A Bush,et al.  Uniqueness of the Dentition as Impressed in Human Skin: A Cadaver Model * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  H. Bernitz,et al.  An Integrated Technique for the Analysis of Skin Bite Marks , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[4]  Mary A. Bush,et al.  Inquiry into the Scientific Basis for Bitemark Profiling and Arbitrary Distortion Compensation , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  H. Sheets,et al.  Statistical Evidence for the Similarity of the Human Dentition , 2011, Journal of forensic sciences.

[6]  J. Kieser,et al.  The Uniqueness of the Human Anterior Dentition: A Geometric Morphometric Analysis , 2007, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  F. Bookstein,et al.  Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology , 1999 .

[8]  F. Rohlf,et al.  Geometric morphometrics: Ten years of progress following the ‘revolution’ , 2004 .

[9]  S. Vadlamani On the Diffusion of Shape , 2007 .

[10]  R. Rawson,et al.  Statistical evidence for the individuality of the human dentition. , 1984, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  Mary A Bush,et al.  The Response of Skin to Applied Stress: Investigation of Bitemark Distortion in a Cadaver Model * , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  Brandon L. Garrett,et al.  Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Sciences Community , 2007 .

[13]  Daniel D Blinka,et al.  Quantification of the Individual Characteristics of the Human Dentition , 2009 .

[14]  M. Bush,et al.  Biomechanical Factors in Human Dermal Bitemarks in a Cadaver Model * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.