Comparing images under variable illumination

We consider the problem of determining whether two images come from different objects or the same object in the same pose, but under different illumination conditions. We show that this problem cannot be solved using hard constraints: even using a Lambertian reflectance model, there is always an object and a pair of lighting conditions consistent with any two images. Nevertheless, we show that for point sources and objects with Lambertian reflectance, the ratio of two images from the same object is simpler than the ratio of images from different objects. We also show that the ratio of the two images provides two of the three distinct values in the Hessian matrix of the object's surface. Using these observations, we develop a simple measure for matching images under variable illumination, comparing its performance to other existing methods on a database of 450 images of 10 individuals.

[1]  Jaakko Hintikka,et al.  On the Logic of Perception , 1969 .

[2]  E. North Coleman,et al.  Obtaining 3-dimensional shape of textured and specular surfaces using four-source photometry , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[3]  Joshua Kiddy K. Asamoah,et al.  Fractal–fractional age-structure study of omicron SARS-CoV-2 variant transmission dynamics , 2022, Partial Differential Equations in Applied Mathematics.

[4]  Irving Biederman,et al.  Human image understanding: Recent research and a theory , 1985, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[5]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Computer Vision , 1988, Adv. Comput..

[6]  S. Ullman Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[7]  Lawrence Sirovich,et al.  Application of the Karhunen-Loeve Procedure for the Characterization of Human Faces , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[8]  M. Turk,et al.  Eigenfaces for Recognition , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  David W. Jacobs,et al.  Space and Time Bounds on Indexing 3D Models from 2D Images , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[10]  Ronen Basri,et al.  Recognition by Linear Combinations of Models , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[11]  Edward M. Riseman,et al.  The non-existence of general-case view-invariants , 1992 .

[12]  A. Shashua Geometry and Photometry in 3D Visual Recognition , 1992 .

[13]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Geometric invariance in computer vision , 1992 .

[14]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Limitations of Non Model-Based Recognition Schemes , 1992, ECCV.

[15]  William T. Freeman,et al.  The generic viewpoint assumption in a framework for visual perception , 1994, Nature.

[16]  L. B. Wolff,et al.  3-D Stereo Using Photometric Ratios , 1994, ECCV.

[17]  Peter W. Hallinan A low-dimensional representation of human faces for arbitrary lighting conditions , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Emanuele Trucco,et al.  Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision , 1995 .

[19]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  What is the set of images of an object under all possible lighting conditions? , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[20]  Shimon Ullman,et al.  Face Recognition: The Problem of Compensating for Changes in Illumination Direction , 1997, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[21]  Lawrence B. Wolff,et al.  Surface Curvature and Shape Reconstruction from Unknown Multiple Illumination and Integrability , 1997, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[22]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[23]  David A. Forsyth,et al.  Shading primitives: finding folds and shallow grooves , 1998, Sixth International Conference on Computer Vision (IEEE Cat. No.98CH36271).

[24]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Illumination cones for recognition under variable lighting: faces , 1998, Proceedings. 1998 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No.98CB36231).