Global modelling of a gas-liquid-solid airlift reactor

Abstract This paper presents a global model of three phase flow (gas–liquid–solid) in an internal airlift reactor. The airlift is composed of four zones: a riser (on the aerated side on the internal wall), a downcomer (on the opposite side) and two turning zones above and below the internal wall. Tap water is the liquid continuous phase and the dispersed phases are air bubbles and polyethylene particles. The global modelling of the airlift involves mass and momentum equations for the three phases. The model enables phase velocities and phase volume fractions to be estimated, which can be compared to experimental data. Closure relations for the gas and solid drift velocities are based on the model proposed by Zuber and Findlay. The drift flux coefficients are derived from CFD numerical simulations of the airlift. Gas bubble and solid particle averaged slip velocities are deduced from momentum balances, including drag coefficient correlations. The link between Zuber and Findlay model and the two-fluid model is established. In the experiment as well as in the model, the gas flow rate is fixed. However, the liquid and solid flow rates are unknown. Two closure relations are needed to predict these flow rates: the first closure relation expresses that the volume of solid injected into the airlift remains constant; the second closure relation expresses a global balance between the difference of column height in the riser and the downcomer and the total pressure drop in the airlift. The main parameters of a three phase airlift reactor, like gas and solid volume fractions, are well predicted by the global model. With increasing solid filling rate (40%), the model starts to depart from the experimental values as soon as coalescence of bubbles appears.

[1]  Campbell W. Robinson,et al.  Application of airlift gas-liquid-solid reactors in biotechnology , 1992 .

[2]  Geoffrey F. Hewitt,et al.  PHASE-INTERFACE Phenomena in Multiphase Flow , 1991 .

[3]  Marco A. Márquez,et al.  Hydrodynamic model for gas‐lift reactors , 1998 .

[4]  Robert F. Mudde,et al.  Simulation of a slurry airlift using a two-fluid model , 2001 .

[5]  J. Heijnen,et al.  A simple hydrodynamic model for the liquid circulation velocity in a full-scale two- and three-phase internal airlift reactor operating in the gas recirculation regime , 1997 .

[6]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Identification of mass transfer parameters in three-phase biofilm reactors , 1999 .

[7]  J. Heijnen,et al.  Formation of Biofilms in a Biofilm Air-Lift Suspension Reactor , 1992 .

[8]  A. Cockx.  Modélisation de contacteurs gaz-liquide : application de la mécanique des fluides numériques aux airlifts , 1997 .

[9]  L. Nikolov,et al.  Free rising spheres do not obey newton's law for free settling , 1992 .

[10]  Valentina Lazarova,et al.  Numerical simulation and physical modeling of the hydrodynamics in an air-lift internal loop reactor , 1997 .

[11]  José A. Teixeira,et al.  Hydrodynamic model for three-phase internal- and external-loop airlift reactors , 1999 .

[12]  Robert F. Mudde,et al.  Two- and three-dimensional simulations of a bubble plume using a two-fluid model , 1999 .

[13]  P. Chatellier,et al.  Two-phase hydrodynamic study of a rectangular air-lift loop reactor with an internal baffle , 1999 .

[14]  J. Heijnen,et al.  The biofilm airlift suspension extension reactor – II: Three-phase hydrodynamics , 2000 .

[15]  P. Chatellier,et al.  Hydrodynamic and mass transfer study in a rectangular three-phase air-lift loop reactor , 2004 .

[16]  N. Zuber,et al.  Average volumetric concentration in two-phase flow systems , 1965 .

[17]  Gabriel Wild,et al.  Experimental and theoretical analysis of the hydrodynamics in the riser of an external loop airlift reactor , 2002 .