Food-associated calls as public information about patch quality

Several species of avian and mammalian social foragers vocalize after locating food. Empirical work has shown that such food-associated calls can be detrimental to the caller because other group members are often attracted to the discovered food. Individuals can obtain anti-predator benefits from emitting food calls if group size increases in response to the vocalization but empirical work has shown that food calls also are emitted by individuals in groups of fixed size ; in such groups, the benefit of emitting food calls is less obvious. Here, I extend earlier work and propose that food-associated calls may represent auditory public information about food patch quality. Food calls thus function to provide patch quality information to other group members. Such information benefits individuals because it allows social foragers in groups of fixed size to exploit resource patches more efficiently by preventing early departures from rich resource patches. The hypothesis that food-associated calls represent auditory patch quality information makes several predictions about the likelihood that foragers will emit a food call in response to food discovery. In particular, this hypothesis predicts that foragers who : 1) are not in visual contact with other group members, 2) do not initiate group movements, or 3) are hungry, should be most likely to give food-associated calls. Empirical evidence to test these predictions is sparse but generally supports these predictions.

[1]  Evidence for a “monitoring call” in red‐bellied tamarins , 1990, American journal of primatology.

[2]  P. Marler,et al.  Food-associated calls in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): I. Socioecological factors , 1993 .

[3]  P. Tannenbaum,et al.  Food-associated calls correlate with food preferences in cotton-top tamarins , 1991, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  P. Marler,et al.  Vocal communication in the domestic chicken: II. Is a sender sensitive to the presence and nature of a receiver? , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  T. Valone,et al.  Patch estimation by group foragers: what information is used? , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  J. Krebs Colonial Nesting and Social Feeding as Strategies for Exploiting Food Resources in the Great Blue Heron (Ardea Herodias) , 1974 .

[7]  D. Winkler,et al.  Flock-feeding on fish schools increases individual success in gulls , 1986, Nature.

[8]  M. Hauser,et al.  Manipulation of food calls in captive chimpanzees. A preliminary report. , 1987, Folia primatologica; international journal of primatology.

[9]  K. Stewart Gorillas : variation in female relationships , 1987 .

[10]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[11]  J. McNamara Optimal patch use in a stochastic environment , 1982 .

[12]  T. Caraco,et al.  Co-operative and non-co-operative bases of food-calling , 1989 .

[13]  C. Clark,et al.  The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .

[14]  Jennifer J. Templeton,et al.  Patch assessment in foraging flocks of European starlings: evidence for the use of public information , 1995 .

[15]  Thomas Caraco,et al.  Risk‐Sensitivity and Foraging Groups , 1981 .

[16]  N. Caine,et al.  Factors affecting the rates of food calls given by red-bellied tamarins , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  T. Valone Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation , 1989 .

[18]  S. L. Lima Protective cover and the use of space : different strategies in finches , 1990 .

[19]  L. Lefebvre,et al.  Manipulating foraging group size: spider monkey food calls at fruiting trees , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  J. Krebs,et al.  Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach , 1978 .

[21]  M. Elgar House sparrows establish foraging flocks by giving chirrup calls if the resources are divisible , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Vigilance while feeding and its relation to the risk of predation , 1987 .

[23]  P. Marler,et al.  Food-associated calls in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta): II. Costs and benefits of call production and suppression , 1993 .

[24]  A. Stokes,et al.  COURTSHIP FEEDING IN GALLINACEOUS BIRDS , 1971 .

[25]  S. Boinski Vocal coordination of troop movement among white‐faced capuchin monkeys, Cebus capucinus , 1993, American journal of primatology.

[26]  J. J. Benz Food-elicited vocalizations in golden lion tamarins: design features for representational communication , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[27]  Foraging on patches: are groups disadvantaged? , 1995 .

[28]  C. Clark,et al.  Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment , 1984, The American Naturalist.

[29]  Richard F. Green,et al.  Stochastic Models of Optimal Foraging , 1987 .

[30]  E. Ranta,et al.  Competition Versus Cooperation: Success of Individuals Foraging Alone and in Groups , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[31]  Thomas J. Valone,et al.  Patch Information and Estimation: A Cost of Group Foraging , 1993 .

[32]  R. J. F. Smith,et al.  Evolution of Alarm Signals: Role of Benefits of Retaining Group Members or Territorial Neighbors , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[33]  J. Parrish Re-examining the selfish herd: are central fish safer? , 1989, Animal Behaviour.

[34]  E. Greene Individuals in an osprey colony discriminate between high and low quality information , 1987, Nature.

[35]  W. Hamilton Geometry for the selfish herd. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.