Towards more sustainable social housing projects: Recognizing the importance of using local resources

Abstract The social housing projects of Brazil are focused on providing shelter for families with low income and on reaching the ultimate objective of more sustainable development of the nation. The Brazilian program, in supporting these families, is carried out through three main standardized housing projects: popular housing (R1), popular building (PP4), and building for social interest (PIS). Decisions regarding the choice of one project instead of another are usually based on economic considerations, disregarding environmental issues important for achieving sustainable development. The main goal of this work is to assess which social housing projects should be promoted in each Brazilian state, aiming for higher sustainability. For this purpose, emergy accounting is used to quantify the environmental sustainability index (ESI*) and the emergy index for construction productivity (EICP, in m 2 /sej). Results show the existence of different degrees of ESI* and EICP values among the three types of social housing projects, when considering the state in which projects are implemented. Analysis of the results identified the social housing projects that should be promoted to maximize ESI* and EICP aiming for higher sustainability. Choosing a project exclusively based on economic considerations could be premature, because it may forgo the opportunity to maximize sustainability of the national social housing program. This study also provides a scientific contribution to the emergy accounting method with regard to the scales of analysis that support the criteria used to count a resource as local or imported and in considering the partial renewabilities of resources according to regional characteristics.

[1]  William W. Braham,et al.  An ecological understanding of net-zero energy building: Evaluation of sustainability based on emergy theory , 2017 .

[2]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Emergetic ternary diagrams: five examples for application in environmental accounting for decision-making , 2007 .

[3]  Rehan Sadiq,et al.  Emergy-Based Life Cycle Assessment (Em-LCA) of Multi-Unit and Single- Family Residential Buildings in Canada , 2014 .

[4]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  Environmental Accounting: Emergy and Environmental Decision Making , 1995 .

[5]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Emergy as a tool for Ecodesign: evaluating materials selection for beverage packages in Brazil , 2010 .

[6]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy evaluations and environmental loading of electricity production systems , 2002 .

[7]  Guillaume Habert,et al.  When CO2 counts: Sustainability assessment of industrialized bamboo as an alternative for social housing programs in the Philippines , 2016 .

[8]  Mark T. Brown,et al.  Emergy-based indices and ratios to evaluate sustainability: monitoring economies and technology toward environmentally sound innovation , 1997 .

[9]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Sustainability assessment of a giant bamboo plantation in Brazil: exploring the influence of labour, time and space , 2010 .

[10]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Assessing geobiosphere work of generating global reserves of coal, crude oil, and natural gas , 2011 .

[11]  William W. Braham,et al.  An integrated energy–emergy approach to building form optimization: Use of EnergyPlus, emergy analysis and Taguchi-regression method , 2015 .

[12]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Primary evidences on the robustness of environmental accounting from emergy , 2013 .

[13]  Howard T. Odum,et al.  A Prosperous Way Down: Principles And Policies , 2001 .

[14]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  A combined tool for environmental scientists and decision makers: ternary diagrams and emergy accounting , 2006 .

[15]  M. El-Haram,et al.  A critical review of reductionist approaches for assessing the progress towards sustainability , 2008 .

[16]  Vishal Puri,et al.  Bamboo reinforced prefabricated wall panels for low cost housing , 2017 .

[17]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Emergy diagnosis and reflections towards Brazilian sustainable development , 2013 .

[18]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Emergy Analysis and Environmental Accounting , 2004 .

[19]  Marco Mason,et al.  The Dashboard of Sustainability to measure the local urban sustainable development: The case study of Padua Municipality , 2009 .

[20]  Jacob Silva Paulsen,et al.  A life cycle energy analysis of social housing in Brazil: Case study for the program “MY HOUSE MY LIFE” , 2013 .

[21]  William W. Braham,et al.  Uncertainty characterization of building emergy analysis (BEmA) , 2015 .

[22]  Feni Agostinho,et al.  Support area as an indicator of environmental load: Comparison between Embodied Energy, Ecological Footprint, and Emergy Accounting methods , 2013 .

[23]  Riccardo Maria Pulselli,et al.  Energy and emergy based cost–benefit evaluation of building envelopes relative to geographical location and climate , 2009 .

[24]  Varun,et al.  Life cycle assessment of buildings: A review , 2011 .

[25]  Paola Sassi,et al.  Characterisation of representative building typologies for social housing projects in Brazil and its energy performance , 2015 .

[26]  A. Buenfil,et al.  EMERGY EVALUATION OF WATER , 2001 .

[27]  Simone Bastianoni,et al.  Emergy analysis of building manufacturing, maintenance and use: Em-building indices to evaluate housing sustainability , 2007 .

[28]  Ludovic Halbert,et al.  Financial markets, developers and the geographies of housing in Brazil: A supply-side account , 2016 .

[29]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Labor and Services as Information Carriers in Emergy-LCA Accounting , 2014 .

[30]  Cecília M.V.B. Almeida,et al.  Multicriteria cost-benefit assessment of tannery production: The need for breakthrough process alternatives beyond conventional technology optimization , 2015 .

[31]  D. Campbell,et al.  Relationships among the Energy, Emergy, and Money Flows of the United States from 1900 to 2011 , 2014, Front. Energy Res..

[32]  H. Odum Ecological and general systems : an introduction to systems ecology , 1994 .

[33]  M. Corson,et al.  Emergy evaluation of contrasting dairy systems at multiple levels. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[34]  D. Campbell Emergy baseline for the Earth: A historical review of the science and a new calculation , 2016 .

[35]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  The geobiosphere emergy baseline: A synthesis , 2016 .

[36]  Vorasun Buranakarn,et al.  Emergy indices and ratios for sustainable material cycles and recycle options , 2003 .

[37]  Ercilia Hitomi Hirota,et al.  Consideração de requisitos ambientais em empreendimentos habitacionais de interesse social: um estudo de caso , 2010 .

[38]  John S. Monahan,et al.  An embodied carbon and energy analysis of modern methods of construction in housing: A case study us , 2011 .

[39]  William W. Braham,et al.  Re(De)fining Net Zero Energy: Renewable Emergy Balance in environmental building design , 2012 .

[40]  Ahjond S Garmestani,et al.  An energy systems view of sustainability: emergy evaluation of the San Luis Basin, Colorado. , 2012, Journal of environmental management.

[41]  Robert Ries,et al.  Comparison of energy-based indicators used in life cycle assessment tools for buildings , 2014 .

[42]  C. Hall,et al.  Revisiting the Limits to Growth After Peak Oil : In the 1970s a rising world population and the finite resources available to support it were hot topics. Interest faded-but it's time to take another look , 2009 .

[43]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Emergy analysis of an industrial park: the case of Dalian, China. , 2010, The Science of the total environment.

[44]  Heather Rothrock,et al.  Sustainable housing: Emergy evaluation of an off-grid residence , 2014 .