The effect of habitat quality on foraging patterns, provisioning rate and nestling growth in Corsican Blue Tits Parus caeruleus

Many bird species face seasonal and spatial variation in the availability of the specific food required to rear chicks. Caterpillar availability is often identified as the most important factor determining chick quality and breeding success in forest birds, such as tits Parus spp. It is assumed that parents play an important role in mediating the effect of environment on chick development. A reduction in prey availability should therefore result in increased foraging effort to maintain the amount of food required for optimal chick development. To investigate the capacity of adults to compensate for a reduction in food supply, we compared the foraging behaviour of Blue Tits Parus caeruleus breeding in rich and poor habitats in Corsica. We monitored the foraging effort of adults using radiotelemetry. We also identified and quantified prey items provided to nestlings by using a video camera mounted on the nest. We found that the mean travelling distance of adults was twice as great in the poor habitat as it was in the rich. Despite the marked difference in foraging distance, the proportion of optimal prey (caterpillars) in the diet of the chicks and the total biomass per hour per chick did not differ between the two habitats. We argue that relationships between habitat richness, offspring quality and breeding success cannot be understood adequately without quantifying parental effort.

[1]  Dr. Eric B. Edney.  Water Balance in Land Arthropods , 1977, Zoophysiology and Ecology.

[2]  J. Blondel,et al.  Food handling time of Blue Tit chicks : constraints and adaptation to different prey types , 1999 .

[3]  D. Bryant.  Energy expenditure in wild birds , 1997, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society.

[4]  B. Naef-Daenzer,et al.  Prey selection and foraging performance of breeding Great Tits Parus major in relation to food availability , 2000 .

[5]  M. Andersson,et al.  Optimal foraging area: size and allocation of search effort. , 1978, Theoretical population biology.

[6]  J. Blondel,et al.  Physiological Ecology of Mediterranean Blue Tits (Parus caeruleus L.): Effects of Ectoparasites (Protocalliphora spp.) and Food Abundance on Metabolic Capacity of Nestlings , 2004, Physiological and Biochemical Zoology.

[7]  A. Dervieux,et al.  Feeding ecology and life history variation of the blue tit in Mediterranean deciduous and sclerophyllous habitats , 1991, Oecologia.

[8]  J. Blondel,et al.  Selection-Based Biodiversity at a Small Spatial Scale in a Low-Dispersing Insular Bird. , 1999, Science.

[9]  James N. M. Smith,et al.  FOOD-SEARCHING BEHAVIOR OF TITMICE IN PATCHY ENVIRONMENTS' , 1974 .

[10]  H. Zandt.  A comparison of three sampling techniques to estimate the population size of caterpillars in trees , 1994, Oecologia.

[11]  J. Blondel,et al.  Nestling diet variation in an insular Mediterranean population of blue tits Parus caeruleus: effects of years, territories and individuals , 1994, Oecologia.

[12]  S. Verhulst,et al.  Variation in food supply, time of breeding, and energy expenditure in birds. , 2001, Science.

[13]  J. Blondel,et al.  Adaptive inter-population differences in blue tit life-history traits on Corsica , 1997, Evolutionary Ecology.

[14]  Beat Naef-Daenzer,et al.  Patch time allocation and patch sampling by foraging great and blue tits , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  Donald F. Caccamise,et al.  An Aerodynamic Basis for Selecting Transmitter Loads in Birds , 1985 .

[16]  F. Renaud,et al.  High blowfly parasitic loads affect breeding success in a Mediterranean population of blue tits , 1997, Oecologia.

[17]  C. Thébaud,et al.  Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in birds: test of hypotheses using blue tits in contrasted Mediterranean habitats , 2002 .

[18]  Erik Matthysen,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on provisioning rates, diet and breeding success in two species of tit (great tit and blue tit) , 1998, Oecologia.

[19]  A. J. Noordwijk,et al.  Effects of local environmental conditions on nestling growth in the great tit Parus major L. , 1994 .

[20]  Gareth Jones,et al.  Bird Flight Performance. A Practical Calculation Manual, C.J. Pennycuick. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1989), x, +153. Price £25 , 1990 .

[21]  J. Blondel,et al.  VARIATION IN BLUE TIT BREEDING PERFORMANCE ACROSS GRADIENTS IN HABITAT RICHNESS , 2003 .

[22]  J. V. Balen,et al.  A Comparative Sudy of the Breeding Ecology of the Great Tit Parus major in Different Habitats , 2015 .

[23]  J. Tinbergen,et al.  Parental energy expenditure during brood rearing in the Great Tit (Parus major) in relation to body mass, temperature, food availability and clutch size , 1994 .

[24]  Jan‐Åke Nilsson,et al.  Food supply, territory quality, and reproductive timing in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus) , 1995 .

[25]  J. Merilä,et al.  Mass loss in breeding blue tits : the role of energetic stress , 1997 .

[26]  J R Speakman,et al.  Energetic and Fitness Costs of Mismatching Resource Supply and Demand in Seasonally Breeding Birds , 2001, Science.