Methods for Gully Characterization in Agricultural Croplands Using Ground-Based Light Detection and Ranging

Soil erosion has long been recognized as the primary cause of soil degradation in agricultural fields (Wells et al., 2010). Overland flow in agricultural fields is the main process associated with soil erosion, which is often grouped into categories of: sheet erosion, rill erosion, and gully erosion (Smith, 1993). Traditionally, research has focussed on understanding and modelling sheet and rill erosion processes (Poesen et al., 1996). Recent research has begun to focus on addressing gully issues such as the understanding of the formation of gullies, their contribution to overall soil loss, development of tools to locate channel initiation, and appropriate measuring techniques (Poesen et al., 2003). The increased focus on gully research can be partially attributed to recent studies demonstrating that gully formation is very common on cropland, especially in conventional tillage systems (Gordon et al., 2008) and can be as significant as sheet and rill erosion in terms of sediment yield (Bingner et al., 2010). Without a good understanding of gully processes, technology cannot be developed that can provide information needed by watershed managers when evaluating and implementing effective conservation practice plans. Gullies can be generally classified as ephemeral, classical, or edge-of-field. The Soil Society of America (2001) defines ephemeral gully as “small channels eroded by concentrated flow that can be easily filled by normal tillage, only to reform again in the same location by additional runoff events”. As the headcut migrates upstream and the channel gets wider, faster than the interval between farming tilling operations, farming equipment is forced to operate around the gully and as result the gully becomes permanent (classical gully). Finally, as the name suggests, edge-of-field gullies are defined by channels where concentrated flow crosses earth bank (Poesen et al., 2003). New methodologies are being researched to understand gully formation and estimate sediment yield (Souchere et al., 2003, Cerdan et al., 2002, and Woodward, 1999). Studies use Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) as the basis to formulate theories explaining the relationship between field topography and gully occurrence (Woodward, 1999, Parker et al., 2007, and Cerdan et al., 2002). These efforts greatly benefit from accurate and detailed topographic information which can aid in the understanding of where and when gullies form and how these features evolve over time (headcut migration). Despite the availability of DEMs at regional and local scales (spatial resolution ranging from 1 to 30 meters), these datasets often do not offer the necessary spatial and/or temporal

[1]  J. Eeckhout,et al.  Spatial Sorting , 2014, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  Automated mapping of potential for ephemeral gully formation in agricultural watersheds , 2010 .

[3]  G. Asner,et al.  Comparison of gully erosion estimates using airborne and ground-based LiDAR on Santa Cruz Island, California , 2010 .

[4]  EFFECT OF UPSTREAM SEDIMENT INFLOW ON THE MORPHODYNAMICS OF HEADCUTS , 2010 .

[5]  R. L. Bingner,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF GULLY EROSION COMPONENTS WITHIN THE USDA ANNAGNPS WATERSHED MODEL FOR PRECISION CONSERVATION , 2010 .

[6]  J. Roering,et al.  Using DInSAR, airborne LiDAR, and archival air photos to quantify landsliding and sediment transport , 2009 .

[7]  Marc Pouget,et al.  Algorithms for Complex Shapes with Certified Numerics and Topology Jet fitting 3 : A Generic C + + Package for Estimating the Differential Properties on Sampled Surfaces via Polynomial Fitting , 2007 .

[8]  Ronald L. Bingner,et al.  Modeling long-term soil losses on agricultural fields due to ephemeral gully erosion , 2008, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[9]  Evaluation of Terrestrial LIDAR for Monitoring Geomorphic Change at Archeological Sites in Grand Canyon National Park, Arizona , 2008 .

[10]  L. Allan James,et al.  Using LiDAR data to map gullies and headwater streams under forest canopy: South Carolina, USA , 2007 .

[11]  Scott B. Baden,et al.  An Efficient Implementation of a Local Binning Algorithm for Digital Elevation Model Generation of LiDAR/ALSM Dataset , 2006 .

[12]  T. Schmid,et al.  A CASE STUDY OF TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING IN EROSION RESEARCH: CALCULATION OF ROUGHNESS AND VOLUME BALANCE AT A LOGGED FOREST SITE , 2004 .

[13]  Y. Tseng,et al.  Change Detection of Landslide Terrains Using Ground-based Lidar Data , 2004 .

[14]  J. Poesen,et al.  Gully erosion and environmental change: importance and research needs , 2003 .

[15]  Veronique Souchere,et al.  Modelling ephemeral gully erosion in small cultivated catchments , 2003 .

[16]  Veronique Souchere,et al.  Incorporating soil surface crusting processes in an expert-based runoff model: Sealing and Transfer by Runoff and Erosion related to Agricultural Management , 2002 .

[17]  Aloysius Wehr,et al.  Airborne laser scanning—an introduction and overview , 1999 .

[18]  Frederik P. Agterberg,et al.  Interactive spatial data analysis , 1996 .

[19]  J. Poesen,et al.  Contribution of gully erosion to sediment production in cultivated lands and rangelands , 1996 .

[20]  Desmond E. Walling,et al.  Erosion and sediment yield : global and regional perspectives , 1996 .

[21]  Trevor C. Bailey,et al.  Interactive Spatial Data Analysis , 1995 .

[22]  L. Smith Investigation of Ephemeral Gullies in Loessial Soils in Mississippi , 1993 .

[23]  D. Woodward,et al.  Method to predict cropland ephemeral gully erosion , 1999 .

[24]  R. Measures Laser remote sensing : fundamentals and applications , 1984 .

[25]  G. H. Holliday,et al.  Glossary of Soil Science Terms , 1965, Soil Science Society of America Journal.

[26]  G. G. Pohlman Soil Science Society of America , 1940 .