The effect of fibre amount, energy level and viscosity of beverages containing oat fibre supplement on perceived satiety

Background Soluble fibre has been proposed to suppress appetite-related perceptions and it could thus contribute favourably to the regulation of energy intake and the increasing obesity problem. Objective To investigate the effect of an oat ingredient rich in β-glucan on perceived satiety at different dietary fibre (DF) concentrations, energy levels and viscosity levels. Design A total of 29 healthy volunteers, age 19–39, mean BMI 23.2 kg/m2 participated in this study. Measurement of subjective perceptions (satiety, fullness, hunger, desire to eat something/the sample food and thirst) was performed during a 180-min period after ingestion of the sample. There were altogether six samples: two beverages without fibre at energy levels 700 and 1,400 kJ; two beverages containing 5 or 10 g oat DF (2.5 and 5 g oat β-glucan, respectively) at energy level 700 kJ, one beverage containing 10 g oat DF/1,400 kJ and one beverage containing 10 g enzymatically treated oat DF with low viscosity at energy level 700 kJ. Each beverage portion weighted 300 g. The order of the samples was randomised for each subject and evaluated during six separate days. The results are reported in three sets of samples: ‘fibre’, ‘energy’ and ‘viscosity’. Results In the fibre set, the beverages containing 5 or 10 g of fibre had a larger area under curve (AUC) for perceived satiety and smaller AUC for hunger compared to the beverage without fibre, but no significant dose–response relationship was detected. Increasing the energy content from 700 to 1,400 kJ in the energy set did not affect the satiety-related perceptions. In the viscosity set, the beverage with low-viscosity β-glucan increased satiety-related perceptions from no fibre containing beverage, but less compared to the beverage with the same amount of fibre and higher viscosity. Conclusions Addition of an oat ingredient rich in β-glucan and high viscosity of beverages enhance post-meal satiety induced by beverages. The effect was, however, not related to the amount of ingested fibre or energy.

[1]  S B Roberts,et al.  Dietary fiber and weight regulation. , 2009, Nutrition reviews.

[2]  Cees de Graaf,et al.  Effect of viscosity on appetite and gastro-intestinal hormones , 2009, Physiology & Behavior.

[3]  L. Karhunen,et al.  Fibre in beverages can enhance perceived satiety , 2009, European journal of nutrition.

[4]  D. Laaksonen,et al.  Viscosity of oat bran-enriched beverages influences gastrointestinal hormonal responses in healthy humans. , 2009, The Journal of nutrition.

[5]  J. Hlebowicz,et al.  Effect of Muesli with 4 g Oat β-Glucan on Postprandial Blood Glucose, Gastric Emptying and Satiety in Healthy Subjects: A Randomized Crossover Trial , 2008, Journal of the American College of Nutrition.

[6]  P. Wood Cereal β-glucans in diet and health , 2007 .

[7]  J. Slavin,et al.  Dietary fibre and satiety , 2007 .

[8]  J. Dwyer,et al.  Fermentable and nonfermentable fiber supplements did not alter hunger, satiety or body weight in a pilot study of men and women consuming self-selected diets. , 2003, The Journal of nutrition.

[9]  A. Drewnowski The role of energy density , 2003, Lipids.

[10]  M. Yeomans,et al.  Dissociation of the effects of preload volume and energy content on subjective appetite and food intake , 2002, Physiology & Behavior.

[11]  R. Mattes,et al.  Beverage viscosity is inversely related to postprandial hunger in humans , 2001, Physiology & Behavior.

[12]  L. Marciani,et al.  Effect of meal viscosity and nutrients on satiety, intragastric dilution, and emptying assessed by MRI. , 2001, American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology.

[13]  R. Mattes,et al.  Effects of food attributes on hunger and food intake , 2000, International Journal of Obesity.

[14]  B. Burton-Freeman Dietary fiber and energy regulation. , 2000, The Journal of nutrition.

[15]  M. Westerterp-Plantenga,et al.  Effect of One Week of Fibre Supplementation on Hunger and Satiety Ratings and Energy Intake , 1997, Appetite.

[16]  C. Graaf,et al.  Effects of Weight and Energy Content of Preloads on Subsequent Appetite and Food Intake , 1996, Appetite.

[17]  Richard D. Mattes,et al.  Dietary Compensation by Humans for Supplemental Energy Provided as Ethanol or Carbohydrate in Fluids , 1996, Physiology & Behavior.

[18]  B. Rolls,et al.  The specificity of satiety: The influence of foods of different macronutrient content on the development of satiety , 1988, Physiology & Behavior.

[19]  M. Westerterp-Plantenga,et al.  The effect of viscosity on ad libitum food intake , 2008, International Journal of Obesity.

[20]  K. M. Behall,et al.  Short-term satiety and glycemic response after consumption of whole grains with various amounts of beta-glucan , 2006 .

[21]  J. Dwyer,et al.  Human Nutrition and Metabolism Research Communication Fermentable and Nonfermentable Fiber Supplements Did Not Alter Hunger, Satiety or Body Weight in a Pilot Study of Men and Women Consuming Self-Selected Diets 1,2 , 2003 .

[22]  L. Marciani,et al.  Gastric response to increased meal viscosity assessed by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging in humans. , 2000, The Journal of nutrition.

[23]  R. Codd,et al.  Measurement of (1 → 3),(1 → 4)‐β‐D‐glucan in barley and oats: A streamlined enzymic procedure , 1991 .

[24]  A. Stunkard,et al.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. , 1985, Journal of psychosomatic research.