The collaborative realization of public values and business goals: Governance and infrastructure of public-private information platforms

The scale of society's evolving challenges gradually surpasses the capacity of the public sector to address them. Coping with these challenges requires budget-short governments to look for innovative ways to transform and improve their operations and service provisioning models. While in many cases transformation starts from the inside-out (based on policy goals) and focuses on reorganization through ICTs, we notice a different class of initiatives in which external ICT developments are capitalized by governments to transform from the outside-in. One category of ICT innovations that is especially promising for such a transformation is that of information platforms (henceforth platforms), which can be used to connect different stakeholders; public and private. Platforms are not new. Yet, there is not much research on using public–private platforms as part of a transformation effort, the (policy) instruments that are involved, nor about dealing with the cascading multi-level challenges that transformation through platforms offers. This paper addresses these knowledge gaps by drawing on empirical research embedded in two long-term endeavors: (1) standard business reporting between businesses and government agencies and (2) international trade information platforms. In both cases, platforms are being collaboratively developed and used by a collective of public and private organizations. These initiatives reveal that government agencies can steer and shape the development of public–private platforms in a way that enables businesses to pursue their own interest whilst transforming business–government interactions and more generally serving collective interests and public value. Our findings indicate that once a public–private governance structure is accepted by stakeholders and adapted to fit with the technical dimensions of the information infrastructure, even platforms that are driven by the private sector can start to evolve in a way that enables extensive transformation of the operations of government.

[1]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Lean government and platform-based governance - Doing more with less , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[2]  Julian Wright,et al.  Multi-Sided Platforms , 2015 .

[3]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agenda , 2007, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Benjamin David Eaton,et al.  The dynamics of digital platform innovation : unfolding the paradox of control and generativity in Apple's iOS , 2012 .

[5]  Cristiano Maciel,et al.  Designing a platform to facilitate the development of virtual e-participation environments , 2010, ICEGOV '10.

[6]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Going Concerns: The Governance of Interorganizational Coordination Hubs , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[7]  Bruce R. Barringer,et al.  Walking a Tightrope: Creating Value Through Interorganizational Relationships , 2000 .

[8]  Annabelle Gawer,et al.  Platforms, Markets and Innovation: An Introduction , 2009 .

[9]  Petter Nielsen,et al.  Control Devolution as Information Infrastructure Design Strategy: A case study of a content service platform for mobile phones in Norway , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[10]  Siegfried P. Gudergan,et al.  Governance of public—private partnerships: lessons learnt from an Australian case? , 2007 .

[11]  G. Vinten.  Public Management Reform. A Comparative Analysis , 2000 .

[12]  B. Klievink.  Unravelling Interdependence : Coordinating Public-Private Service Networks , 2011 .

[13]  Yao-Hua Tan,et al.  Accelerating Global Supply Chains with IT Innovation - ITAIDE Methods and Tools , 2011 .

[14]  Willeke Rietdijk.  Advanced qualitative research: a guide to using theory , 2016 .

[15]  H. De Bruijn,et al.  Process Management: Why Project Management Fails in Complex Decision Making Processes , 2005 .

[16]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation , 2013 .

[17]  A. Gawer.  Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework , 2014 .

[18]  H. Chesbrough.  The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[19]  Juha Hintsa,et al.  Drivers and barriers affecting usage of e-Customs - A global survey with customs administrations using multivariate analysis techniques , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[20]  Carliss Y. Baldwin,et al.  The Architecture of Platforms: A Unified View , 2008 .

[21]  Geert Bouckaert,et al.  Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis , 2004 .

[22]  Stephanie M. Farewell.  XBRL for Interactive Data: Engineering the Information Value Chain. , 2009 .

[23]  Jan van Dijk,et al.  Does e-government reduce the administrative burden of businesses? An assessment of business-to-government systems usage in the Netherlands , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[24]  Markus Nüttgens,et al.  XBRL: Impacts, Issues and Future Research Directions , 2012, FinanceCom.

[25]  Robert E. Pinsker,et al.  XBRL awareness in auditing: a sleeping giant? , 2003 .

[26]  N. Tunzelmann.  Historical coevolution of governance and technology in the industrial revolutions , 2003 .

[27]  Miklos A. Vasarhelyi,et al.  Essentials of XBRL: Financial Reporting in the 21st Century , 2003 .

[28]  Uri Gal,et al.  Boundary Matters: The Dynamics of Boundary Objects, Information Infrastructures, and Organisational Identities , 2008 .

[29]  Michael A. Cusumano.  Google: what it is and what it is not , 2005, CACM.

[30]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Enhancing Visibility in International Supply Chains: The Data Pipeline Concept , 2012, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[31]  Andrea Schenker-Wicki,et al.  The impact of outside‐in open innovation on innovation performance , 2011 .

[32]  Tobias Bachmeier,et al.  Business Model Generation A Handbook For Visionaries Game Changers And Challengers , 2016 .

[33]  K. Lyytinen,et al.  Digital Infrastructures : The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010 .

[34]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[35]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Barriers and impediments to transformational government: insights from literature and practice , 2011, Electron. Gov. an Int. J..

[36]  Jørn Braa,et al.  DEVELOPING HEALTH INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES THE FLEXIBLE STANDARDS STRATEGY , 2006 .

[37]  Mahmud Akhter Shareef,et al.  Transformational government through eGov practice : socioeconomic, cultural, and technological issues , 2012 .

[38]  Laurence E. Lynn,et al.  Studying Governance and Public Management: Challenges and Prospects , 2000 .

[39]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[40]  Nitesh Bharosa,et al.  Challenging the Chain: Governing the Automated Exchange and Processing of Business Information , 2015 .

[41]  C. Oliver.  Determinants of Interorganizational Relationships: Integration and Future Directions , 1990 .

[42]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  A survey of Web-based business models for e-government in the Netherlands , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[43]  Vishanth Weerakkody,et al.  Moving from E-Government to T-Government: A Study of Process Reengineering Challenges in a UK Local Authority Context , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Gov. Res..

[44]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  From eParticipation to mobile participation: Designing a service platform and business model for mobile participation , 2013, Inf. Polity.

[45]  Bram Klievink,et al.  Developing Multi-Layer Information Infrastructures: Advancing Social Innovation through Public–Private Governance , 2014, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[46]  Tomasz Janowski,et al.  Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[47]  A.F.E. van Veenstra,et al.  IT-induced public sector transformation , 2012 .

[48]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[49]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Design theory for dynamic complexity in information infrastructures: the case of building internet , 2010, J. Inf. Technol..

[50]  K. Provan,et al.  Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness , 2007 .

[51]  Yu-Che Chen,et al.  A comparative study of e-government XBRL implementations: The potential of improving information transparency and efficiency , 2012, Gov. Inf. Q..

[52]  Soon Ae Chun,et al.  Building the next generation of digital government infrastructures , 2009, Gov. Inf. Q..

[53]  Henrik Sternberg,et al.  Exploring security effects on transport performance , 2013 .

[54]  Andrew Lopez,et al.  The persistence of innovation in government , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[55]  Boriana Rukanova,et al.  Accelerating Global Supply Chains with IT-Innovation, ITAIDE Tools and Methods , 2010 .