Research Comparing Three Heel Ulcer‐Prevention Devices

OBJECTIVE To compare 3 pressure-reduction devices for effectiveness in prevention of heel ulcers in moderate-risk to high-risk patients. DESIGN A prospective quasi-experimental 3-group design was used. SETTING AND SUBJECTS A sample of 338 “moderate-risk to high-risk” adult inpatients, ages 18 to 97, at 2 medical centers in South Texas were studied. INSTRUMENTS The Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk and investigator-developed history and skin assessment tools were used. METHODS Subjects were randomly assigned to the High-Cushion Kodel Heel Protector (bunny boot), Egg Crate Heel Lift Positioner (egg crate), or EHOB Foot Waffle Air Cushion (foot waffle). Data are demographics, Braden scores, comorbidities, skin assessments, lengths of stay, and costs of devices. Analyses were Chi-square, analysis of variance, and regression. RESULTS Of 240 subjects with complete data, 77 (32%) were assigned to the bunny boot group, 87 (36.3%) to the egg crate, and 76 (31.7%) to the foot waffle. Twelve ulcers developed in 240 subjects (5% incidence). Six subjects had only 1 foot. Eleven ulcers were Stage I (nonblanchable erythema), and 1 was Stage II (partial thickness). Overall incidence was 3.9% for the bunny boot, 4.6% for the egg crate, and 6.6% for the foot waffle (not significantly different among groups). The bunny boot with pillows was most cost effective (F[3], N = 240) = 1.342, p ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS In this study, the bunny boot was as effective as higher-tech devices. The results, however, were confounded by nurses adding pillows to the bunny boot group.

[1]  Nancy Sims,et al.  Effects of Different Cyclic Pressurization and Relief Patterns on Heel Skin Blood Perfusion , 2002, Advances in skin & wound care.

[2]  S. Grobe,et al.  Maintenance of Skin Integrity as a Clinical Indicator of Nursing Care , 2002, Advances in skin & wound care.

[3]  W L Miller,et al.  The 1999 National Pressure Ulcer Prevalence Survey: a benchmarking approach. , 2001, Advances in skin & wound care.

[4]  C. Fife,et al.  Incidence of pressure ulcers in a neurologic intensive care unit , 2001, Critical care medicine.

[5]  M. Patrick,et al.  A National Study of Pressure Ulcer Prevalence and Incidence in Acute Care Hospitals , 2000, Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society.

[6]  T A Sheldon,et al.  Beds, mattresses and cushions for pressure sore prevention and treatment. , 2000, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[7]  P. Lowthian.  The limits of pressure sore prevention , 2000, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[8]  E. M. DeVito,et al.  The Increasing Medical Malpractice Risk Related to Pressure Ulcers in the United States , 2000, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[9]  L. A. Riesenberg,et al.  Predictors of hospital acquired heel pressure ulcers. , 1997, Ostomy/wound management.

[10]  Soeken Kl.  Comments on statistical validity. , 1997 .

[11]  Capobianco Ml,et al.  Factors affecting the predictive validity of the Braden Scale. , 1996, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[12]  N. Bergstrom,et al.  Multi‐site Study of Incidence of Pressure Ulcers and the Relationship Between Risk Level, Demographic Characteristics, Diagnoses, and Prescription of Preventive Interventions , 1996, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[13]  E. Dejaeger,et al.  Pressure-reducing effects of heel protectors. , 1994, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[14]  N. Bergstrom,et al.  The Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Sore Risk , 1987, Nursing research.

[15]  N. Bergstrom,et al.  A Conceptual Schema for the Study of the Etiology of Pressure Sores , 1987, Rehabilitation nursing : the official journal of the Association of Rehabilitation Nurses.

[16]  N. Nie,et al.  Statistical Package for the Social Sciences , 1970 .

[17]  Koji Kito,et al.  Pressure ulcers in America: prevalence, incidence, and implications for the future. An executive summary of the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel monograph. , 2001, Advances in skin & wound care.

[18]  B. Pieper,et al.  Risk factors, prevention methods, and wound care for patients with pressure ulcers. , 1998, Clinical nurse specialist CNS.

[19]  A. C. Tymec,et al.  A comparison of two pressure-relieving devices on the prevention of heel pressure ulcers. , 1997, Advances in wound care : the journal for prevention and healing.

[20]  P. Panel.  Pressure Ulcer Treatment: Quick Reference Guide for Clinicians , 1996 .

[21]  N. Bergstrom,et al.  The Braden Scale for predicting pressure sore risk. Nursing Research, 36 (4), 205-210 , 1988 .