Networks and Innovation: The Role of Social Assets in Explaining Firms' Innovative Capacity

The claim of a positive association between a firm's social assets and its innovative capacity is a widely debated topic in the literature. Although controversial, such an argument has informed recent innovation policy across Germany, increasingly directed to the cluster formation. In the light of the growing attention and financial efforts that cluster-based innovation policies are receiving, it is worth answering two main questions. First, are firms with a relatively high level of social capital likely to be more innovative? Secondly, do companies pursuing innovation in partnership innovate more? This paper empirically answers these questions by exploring a cross-sectoral sample of 248 firms based in the Jena region. On the one hand, the extent to which a firm is integrated in its community life does not contribute to an explanation of its innovative performance. On the other hand, directed cooperation with the specific goal of innovating shows a positive impact on innovative performance. However, the correlation between the extent of the network of co-innovators and firms' innovative capacity presents an inverted U-shaped relation: there is a threshold in the number of co-innovators justified by the costs of innovating by interacting. A policy lesson can be drawn from these findings: cluster-based policies are to be treated with caution as firms face costs of networking and not merely benefits.

[1]  M. Lessnoff.  Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[2]  M. Storper.  The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later , 1995 .

[3]  P. Romer.  Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  The Network of Innovators in Jena: An Application of Social Network Analysis , 2006 .

[5]  M. Storper,et al.  Better Rules or Stronger Communities? On the Social Foundations of Institutional Change and Its Economic Effects , 2006 .

[6]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Inter-firm partnerships and co-operative strategies in core technologies , 1990 .

[7]  John A. Hansen,et al.  Innovation, firm size, and firm age , 1992, Small Business Economics.

[8]  Pierre Bourdieu.  Le capital social , 2012 .

[9]  Riccardo Crescenzi,et al.  Research and Development, Spillovers, Innovation Systems, and the Genesis of Regional Growth in Europe , 2006 .

[10]  R. Nelson.  National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[11]  R. Lucas.  On the Mechanics of Economic Development , 1988 .

[12]  R. Levin.  Appropriability, R&D Spending, and Technological Performance , 1988 .

[13]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[14]  B. Nooteboom.  Learning by Interaction: Absorptive Capacity, Cognitive Distance and Governance , 2000 .

[15]  F. Schivardi,et al.  Firm Size Distribution and Growth , 2003 .

[16]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[17]  D. Dohse,et al.  Cluster‐Based Technology Policy—The German Experience , 2007 .

[18]  K. Morgan.  The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal , 1997 .

[19]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[20]  G. Dosi.  Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation , 1988 .

[21]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  J. Kline,et al.  Research Joint Ventures and the Cost Paradox , 2000 .

[23]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Social Capital , 2004 .

[24]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[25]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis , 1988 .

[26]  H. Smith.  Universities, Innovation, and Territorial Development: A Review of the Evidence , 2007 .

[27]  Richard C. Levin,et al.  Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R&D with Spillovers , 1988 .

[28]  Robert Hassink,et al.  Geographic ‘clustering’ in the German opto electronics industry , 1998 .

[29]  Chris Hendry,et al.  Regional Clustering of High Technology-based Firms: Opto-electronics in Three Countries , 2000 .

[30]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[31]  P. Cooke,et al.  Social capital, firm embeddedness and regional development , 2005 .

[32]  P. Reiss,et al.  Cost-Reducing and Demand-Creating R&D with Spillovers , 1988 .

[33]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[34]  Roberto Simonetti,et al.  Concentration, firm size and innovation: evidence from innovation costs , 1995 .

[35]  C. Freeman.  Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues , 1991 .

[36]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? , 2002 .

[37]  Uwe Cantner,et al.  Innovationssystem und Gründungsgeschehen in Jena: Erste Erkenntnisse einer Unternehmensbefragung , 2003 .

[38]  E. Malecki.  Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning, and Cooperative Advantage , 2003 .

[39]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Small Firms, Social Capital and the Enhancement of Business Performance Through Innovation Programmes , 1999 .

[40]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Economic Sources of Inventive Activity , 1962, The Journal of Economic History.

[41]  S. Iammarino.  An evolutionary integrated view of Regional Systems of Innovation: Concepts, measures and historical perspectives , 2005 .

[42]  Kenneth W. Koput,et al.  A Chaotic Model of Innovative Search: Some Answers, Many Questions , 1997 .

[43]  K. Green.  National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[44]  J. Hagedoorn,et al.  Strategic Partnering and Technological Co-Operation , 1990 .

[45]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[46]  M. Storper.  The Regional World: Territorial Development in a Global Economy , 1997 .

[47]  R. Crescenzi,et al.  The territorial dynamics of innovation: a Europe-United States Comparative Analysis , 2007 .

[48]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[49]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[50]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Innovation Prone and Innovation Averse Societies: Economic Performance in Europe , 1999 .

[51]  Tom Broekel,et al.  The Bright and Dark Side of Cooperation for Regional Innovation Performance , 2008 .

[52]  Ken-ichi Inada,et al.  The mechanism of economic development , 1992 .

[53]  Caroline Hussler,et al.  Innovation in regions: What does really matter? , 2005 .

[54]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Knowledge Economies: Clusters, Learning and Cooperative Advantage , 2001 .

[55]  Holger Graf,et al.  Networks in the Innovation Process: Local and Regional Interactions , 2007 .

[56]  L. Klomp,et al.  Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach , 2001 .

[57]  F. E..  Principles of Economics , 1890, Nature.

[58]  Z. Ács,et al.  Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm Size , 1987 .

[59]  Richard Florida,et al.  When Social Capital Stifles Innovation , 2002 .

[60]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[61]  Matthew Murphy,et al.  A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation in Cross-Sector Collaborations , 2012 .

[62]  J. Petersen.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy , 1993 .

[63]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  What Is Private and What Is Public About Technology? , 1989 .

[64]  TATuP Redaktion.  4th International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation , 2000 .

[65]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Collaborative ventures between U.S. and foreign manufacturing firms , 1989 .

[66]  Roland Helm,et al.  Strukturen und Strategien in einem Innovationssystem: das Beispiel Jena , 2003 .

[67]  A. Drejer.  Innovation and learning , 2003 .