Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Climate Science, Development Practice, and Policy Interactions in Dryland Agroecological Systems

The literature on drought, livelihoods, and poverty suggests that dryland residents are especially vulnerable to climate change. However, assessing this vulnerability and sharing lessons between dryland communities on how to reduce vulnerability has proven difficult because of multiple definitions of vulnerability, complexities in quantification, and the temporal and spatial variability inherent in dryland agroecological systems. In this closing editorial, we review how we have addressed these challenges through a series of structured, multiscale, and interdisciplinary vulnerability assessment case studies from drylands in West Africa, southern Africa, Mediterranean Europe, Asia, and Latin America. These case studies adopt a common vulnerability framework but employ different approaches to measuring and assessing vulnerability. By comparing methods and results across these cases, we draw out the following key lessons: (1) Our studies show the utility of using consistent conceptual frameworks for vulnerability assessments even when quite different methodological approaches are taken; (2) Utilizing narratives and scenarios to capture the dynamics of dryland agroecological systems shows that vulnerability to climate change may depend more on access to financial, political, and institutional assets than to exposure to environmental change; (3) Our analysis shows that although the results of quantitative models seem authoritative, they may be treated too literally as predictions of the future by policy makers looking for evidence to support different strategies. In conclusion, we acknowledge there is a healthy tension between bottom-up/ qualitative/place-based approaches and top-down/quantitative/generalizable approaches, and we encourage researchers from different disciplines with different disciplinary languages, to talk, collaborate, and engage effectively with each other and with stakeholders at all levels.

[1]  Evan D.G. Fraser,et al.  Travelling in antique lands: using past famines to develop an adaptability/resilience framework to identify food systems vulnerable to climate change , 2007 .

[2]  Todd A. Crane,et al.  Fielding Climate Change in Cultural Anthropology , 2009 .

[3]  M S Reed,et al.  Participatory scenario development for environmental management: a methodological framework illustrated with experience from the UK uplands. , 2013, Journal of environmental management.

[4]  J. Eyles,et al.  Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[5]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. , 2007 .

[6]  T. Crane Of Models and Meanings: Cultural Resilience in Social–Ecological Systems , 2010 .

[7]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[8]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Panarchy Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2002 .

[9]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Strange Weather, Again , 2010 .

[10]  J. Urry,et al.  Changing Climates: Introduction , 2010 .

[11]  Mette Termansen,et al.  Typologies of crop-drought vulnerability: an empirical analysis of the socio-economic factors that influence the sensitivity and resilience to drought of three major food crops in China (1961–2001) , 2009 .

[12]  Katharine Vincent,et al.  Uncertainty in adaptive capacity and the importance of scale , 2007 .

[13]  Rob J.F. Burton,et al.  Using scenarios to explore UK upland futures , 2009 .

[14]  Wenjun Li,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems China's Grassland Contract Policy and its Impacts on Herder Ability to Benefit in Inner Mongolia: Tragic Feedbacks , 2011 .

[15]  Mitch Chapura Scale, causality, complexity and emergence: rethinking scale’s ontological significance , 2009 .

[16]  P. Ericksen Conceptualizing food systems for global environmental change research , 2008 .

[17]  A. Newton,et al.  Use of a Bayesian Belief Network to Predict the Impacts of Commercializing Non-timber Forest Products on Livelihoods , 2006 .

[18]  M. Price Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems , 2003 .

[19]  L. Stringer Reviewing the links between desertification and food insecurity: from parallel challenges to synergistic solutions , 2009, Food Security.

[20]  Frank Thomalla,et al.  Coping with Multiple Stresses in Rural South Africa , 2011 .

[21]  J. Palutikof,et al.  Climate change 2007 : impacts, adaptation and vulnerability , 2001 .

[22]  M. Bravo Voices from the sea ice: the reception of climate impact narratives , 2009 .

[23]  Piotr Magnuszewski,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Rebuilding Resilience in the Sahel: Regreening in the Maradi and Zinder Regions of Niger , 2011 .

[24]  A. Zoomers,et al.  Exploring the Frontier of Livelihoods Research , 2005 .

[25]  Federica Ravera,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Envisioning Adaptive Strategies to Change: Participatory Scenarios for Agropastoral Semiarid Systems in Nicaragua , 2011 .

[26]  B. Smit,et al.  Case study and analogue methodologies in climate change vulnerability research , 2010 .

[27]  Andrew J. Challinor,et al.  Increased crop failure due to climate change: assessing adaptation options using models and socio-economic data for wheat in China , 2010 .

[28]  M. Janssen,et al.  Multi-Agent Systems for the Simulation of Land-Use and Land-Cover Change: A Review , 2003 .

[29]  M. Hulme Geographical work at the boundaries of climate change , 2008 .

[30]  Klaus Hubacek,et al.  Guest Editorial, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Assessing Vulnerability to Climate Change in Dryland Livelihood Systems: Conceptual Challenges and Interdisciplinary Solutions , 2011 .

[31]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: The use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps as a communication and learning tool , 2010 .

[32]  Mark Rounsevell,et al.  Developing qualitative scenario storylines for environmental change assessment , 2010 .

[33]  R. Cowling,et al.  The role of participatory modeling in landscape approaches to reconcile conservation and development , 2010 .

[34]  Anette Reenberg,et al.  Cultural barriers to climate change adaptation: A case study from Northern Burkina Faso , 2010 .

[35]  Marta Pérez-Soba,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Landscape Scenarios and Multifunctionality - Making Land Use Assessment Operational How Personal Judgment Influences Scenario Development: an Example for Future Rural Development in Europe , 2010 .

[36]  E. Moors,et al.  Socioeconomics, policy, or climate change: what is driving vulnerability in southern Portugal? , 2011 .

[37]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Scenarios for Ecosystem Services: An Overview , 2006 .

[38]  Chasca Twyman,et al.  Good or bad rangeland? Hybrid knowledge, science, and local understandings of vegetation dynamics in the Kalahari , 2004 .

[39]  Andrew J. Dougill,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Anticipating Vulnerability to Climate Change in Dryland Pastoral Systems: Using Dynamic Systems Models for the Kalahari , 2010 .

[40]  W. Adger,et al.  Successful adaptation to climate change across scales , 2005 .

[41]  Rosalind Eyben,et al.  Introduction: Exploring Power for Change , 2006 .

[42]  Suraje Dessai,et al.  Unstable climates: Exploring the statistical and social constructions of ‘normal’ climate , 2009 .

[43]  J. Lassoie,et al.  Synthesis, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Vulnerability of Worldwide Pastoralism to Global Changes and Interdisciplinary Strategies for Sustainable Pastoralism , 2011 .

[44]  A. Stewart,et al.  Linguistic dimensions of weather and climate perception , 2007, International journal of biometeorology.

[45]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Process and content: two ways of using SSM , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[46]  Andrew E. G. Jonas Pro scale: further reflections on the ‘scale debate’ in human geography , 2006 .

[47]  Patrick McAlpine,et al.  Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[48]  D. Wadley,et al.  Dynamic sustainabilities: technology, environment, social justice , 2011 .

[49]  Lindsay C. Stringer,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Resilience and Vulnerability of Arid and Semi-Arid Social Ecological Systems Resilient or Vulnerable Livelihoods? Assessing Livelihood Dynamics and Trajectories in Rural Botswana , 2010 .

[50]  A. Nightingale,et al.  A Feminist in the Forest: Situated Knowledges and Mixing Methods in Natural Resource Management , 2003 .

[51]  S. Marston,et al.  Human geography without scale , 2005 .

[52]  E. Fraser Food system vulnerability: Using past famines to help understand how food systems may adapt to climate change , 2006 .