Knowledge strategy in organizations: refining the model of Hansen, Nohria and Tierney

We assessed the model of knowledge strategy and IT support proposed by Hansen, Nohria and Tierney. Their main argument is that, in order to enable effective use of knowledge, organizations should select an 80/20 knowledge strategy mix of codification and personalization with one of these strategies dominant. We examined the knowledge strategy emphasis (codification or personalization) in each of four case organizations. These organizations represented different combinations of the codification and personalization knowledge strategy mix. Our cases indicate some support for Hansen et al.'s main argument, but also highlight the need for refinements to their model. Based on our assessment, we conclude that the advice of Hansen et al. is useful for deciding upon an initial strategic direction and setting suitable priorities. We propose the following refinements to the model. First, organizations may find it necessary to evolve their knowledge strategy mix over time, augmenting the alternate strategy as a result of the intertwined nature of knowledge processes. Second, we propose two strategic pathways that organizations could adopt on their journey towards effective use of organizational knowledge. Lastly, we identify additional considerations for deciding upon a particular knowledge strategy direction.

[1]  Heiner Müller-Merbach.  Knowledge is more than information , 2004 .

[2]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[3]  Michael J. Earl,et al.  Knowledge Management Strategies: Toward a Taxonomy , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  M. McLure Wasko,et al.  "It is what one does": why people participate and help others in electronic communities of practice , 2000, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[5]  Fawzy Soliman,et al.  Strategies for implementing knowledge management: role of human resources management , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[6]  Mark J. Safferstone.  Leveraging the New Infrastructure: How Market Leaders Capitalize on Information Technology , 1998 .

[7]  R. Yin.  Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[8]  Linda S. Lotto.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods , 1986 .

[9]  Roger E. Bohn,et al.  Chapter 17 – Measuring and Managing Technological Knowledge , 1998 .

[10]  Rens Scheepers,et al.  Harnessing Intranet Technology for Organisational Knowledge Creation , 2001, Australas. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  M. Polanyi.  Chapter 7 – The Tacit Dimension , 1997 .

[12]  S. Newell,et al.  From global knowledge management to internal electronic fences: contradictory outcomes of intranet development , 2001 .

[13]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[14]  Martin R. Gibbs,et al.  Supporting Knowledge Strategy in Consulting Organizations: Codification, Personalization or Both , 2003, PACIS.

[15]  L. Prusak.  Knowledge in organizations , 1997 .

[16]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Developing a Knowledge Strategy , 1999 .

[18]  Ronald Maier,et al.  Defining process-oriented knowledge management strategies , 2002 .

[19]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[20]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[21]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  The Case Research Strategy in Studies of Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[22]  E. Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier , 2000 .

[23]  G. Lakomski.  Managing Organizational Knowledge , 2005 .

[24]  C. Perrow.  Complex Organizations: A Critical Essay , 1975 .

[25]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[26]  T. Davenport,et al.  Improving Knowledge Work Processes , 1996 .

[27]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[28]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  A Set of Principles for Conducting and Evaluating Interpretive Field Studies in Information Systems , 1999, MIS Q..

[29]  Judy E. Scott.  Organizational knowledge and the Intranet , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[30]  R. Dunford.  KEY CHALLENGES IN THE SEARCH FOR THE EFFECTIVE MANAGEMENT OF KNOWLEDGE IN MANAGEMENT CONSULTING FIRMS. , 2000 .

[31]  E. Clemons.  Using Scenario Analysis to Manage the Strategic Risks of Reengineering , 1995 .

[32]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  What's your strategy for managing knowledge? , 1999, Harvard business review.

[33]  Gerardo Patriotta,et al.  On studying organizational knowledge , 2004 .

[34]  Edgar A. Whitley,et al.  What is Meant by Tacit Knowledge? Towards a Better Understanding of the Shape of Actions , 2000, ECIS.

[35]  R. McDermott.  Why Information Technology Inspired but Cannot Deliver Knowledge Management , 1999 .

[36]  M. Gordon,et al.  PUBLICATION RECORDS AND TENURE DECISIONS IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1996 .

[37]  Karlheinz Kautz.  Using IT to Support Knowledge Management - A Survey- Based Study of a Large, Global Consulting Company , 2002 .

[38]  W. Neuman,et al.  Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 2002 .

[39]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Managing Codified Knowledge , 1999 .

[40]  Dick Stenmark,et al.  Leveraging Tacit Organizational Knowledge , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[41]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[42]  Geoff Walsham,et al.  Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method , 1995 .

[43]  Rens Scheepers,et al.  Configuring Web-based Support for Dispersed Project Groups , 2002 .

[44]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[45]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[46]  William L. Fuerst,et al.  Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: a resource-based analysis , 1995 .