You want to appear competent? Be mean! You want to appear sociable? Be lazy! Group differentiation and the compensation effect

Using the two fundamental dimensions of social judgment, warmth and competence, we show that, contrary to general models of impression formation, negative information on one dimension has positive consequences on the way a target is judged on the other dimension. Participants learned about two groups which were either congruent on warmth and competence (one group high on both and the other low on both) or they were compensatory (one group high on warmth and low on competence, the other high on competence and low on warmth). Our results show that in the compensatory condition, the groups were rated more extremely than in the congruent condition and that this was especially the case for the dimension on which the groups were high. Results are discussed both in terms of how they run counter to traditional theories of impression formation and what they tell us about the fundamental dimensions of social judgment.

[1]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[2]  R. Brown.  Social Psychology: The Second Edition , 1986 .

[3]  R. Brown,et al.  Social Psychology, 2nd Ed , 1965 .

[4]  J. M. Kittross.  The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[5]  N. Anderson.  PRIMACY EFFECTS IN PERSONALITY IMPRESSION FORMATION USING A GENERALIZED ORDER EFFECT PARADIGM. , 1965, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[7]  Freda Kemp.  Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 2003 .

[8]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[9]  V. Yzerbyt,et al.  Not Competent but Warm... Really? Compensatory Stereotypes in the French-speaking World , 2005 .

[10]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Person memory and judgment. , 1989, Psychological review.

[11]  Phoebe C. Ellsworth,et al.  Sentimental Stereotypes: Emotional Expectations for High-and Low-Status Group Members , 2000 .

[12]  C. Judd,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  When Professionals Become Mothers, Warmth Doesn't Cut the Ice , 2004 .

[14]  Mark P. Zanna,et al.  Attribute dimensions and patterns of trait inferences , 1972 .

[15]  P. S. Vivekananthan,et al.  A multidimensional approach to the structure of personality impressions. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Amy J. C. Cuddy,et al.  This Old Stereotype: The Stubbornness and Pervasiveness of the Elderly Stereotype , 2005 .

[17]  J.,et al.  Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 1965, Nature.

[18]  Michael I. Norton,et al.  This Old Stereotype: The Pervasiveness and Persistence of the Elderly Stereotype , 2005 .

[19]  S. Asch.  Forming impressions of personality. , 1946, Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

[20]  E. Thorndike.  Intelligence and its uses. , 1920 .

[21]  N. Anderson.  Averaging versus adding as a stimulus-combination rule in impression formation. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.