Examining the socio-technical determinants influencing government agencies' open data publication: A study in Taiwan

Abstract Open government data has become an important movement for government administrations around the world. Nevertheless, government agencies tend not to open their datasets and can act reluctantly to embed the concept of data publication in their daily operations. Accordingly, this study examines the determinants that are argued to have influences on the government agencies' intention and behavior of open data publication. Relevant hypotheses are developed through literature review to form a preliminary research model, and respective influences of the determinants on the government agencies' intention and behavior to publish datasets are statistically tested. The empirical results show that the determinants account for 60.4% of the variance in agencies' intention and 54.2% of the variance in agencies' behavior. All the determinants are statistically significant except for perceived effort and perceived benefits. Specifically, facilitating conditions and organizational capability are the two factors having the strongest positive effect. Perceived usefulness, external influence, and organizational culture also have positive influences while perceived risks indeed incur a negative impact on the intention. On the contrary, perceived effort and perceived benefits are found to be insignificant. Lastly, intention is statistically significant and indeed acts as a strong antecedent to predict government agencies' activities of open data publication. Practical implications are also offered to practitioners. A designated government agency should act as the coordinator to help agencies obtain facilitations from others. Agencies' concern of data misuse should be mitigated, as it is found to be the major driver having a negative impact. The limitations and future research directions are also discussed. The findings and discussions of this study are expected to contribute to the current open data literature.

[1]  Leo W. Jeffres,et al.  Understanding Employees' Willingness to Contribute to Shared Electronic Databases , 2006, Commun. Res..

[2]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[3]  Katleen Janssen,et al.  Legal and Institutional Challenges for Opening Data across Public Sectors: Towards Common Policy Solutions , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[4]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[5]  Shin-Yuan Hung,et al.  Determinants of user acceptance of the e-Government services: The case of online tax filing and payment system , 2006, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Interorganizational information integration: A key enabler for digital government , 2007, Gov. Inf. Q..

[7]  Wynne W. Chin.  Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling by , 2009 .

[8]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research , 2003 .

[9]  Anne Fleur van Veenstra,et al.  Opening Moves - Drivers, Enablers and Barriers of Open Data in a Semi-public Organization , 2013, EGOV.

[10]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[11]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[12]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[13]  M. Janssen,et al.  Infomediary Business Models for Connecting Open Data Providers and Users , 2014 .

[14]  M. Kenward,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 2007 .

[15]  J. Kucera,et al.  Benefits and Risks of Open Government Data , 2014 .

[16]  Cláudio Sonáglio Albano,et al.  Open government data: a value chain model proposal , 2013, DG.O.

[17]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective , 2010 .

[18]  Nicolau Reinhard,et al.  Open Government Data: Facilitating and Motivating Factors for Coping with Potential Barriers in the Brazilian Context , 2014, EGOV.

[19]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  The negative effects of open government data - investigating the dark side of open data , 2014, DG.O.

[20]  E. Rogers.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[21]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[22]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Exploring the determinants of scientific data sharing: Understanding the motivation to publish research data , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[23]  Ronald T. Cenfetelli,et al.  Interpretation of Formative Measurement in Information Systems Research , 2009, MIS Q..

[24]  Natalie Helbig,et al.  Information Strategies for Open Government: Challenges and Prospects for Deriving Public Value from Government Transparency , 2010, EGOV.

[25]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  IT and organizational change: an institutionalist perspective , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[26]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS , 2014 .

[27]  Nils Urbach,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling in Information Systems Research Using Partial Least Squares , 2010 .

[28]  E. Schein.  Organizational Culture and Leadership , 1991 .

[29]  Barbara Ubaldi,et al.  Open Government Data , 2019, Government at a Glance: Latin America and the Caribbean 2020.

[30]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[31]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  Reconciling Contradictions of Open Data Regarding Transparency, Privacy, Security and Trust , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[32]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet , 2011 .

[33]  Jouni Markkula,et al.  Open Traffic Data for Future Service Innovation - Addressing the Privacy Challenges of Driving Data , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[34]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[35]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  Exploring the effectiveness of cross-boundary information sharing in the public sector: the perspective of government agencies , 2015, Inf. Res..

[36]  Marijn Janssen,et al.  Design principles for improving the process of publishing open data , 2014 .

[37]  Jo Bates,et al.  The strategic importance of information policy for the contemporary neoliberal state: The case of Open Government Data in the United Kingdom , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[38]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[39]  Wynne W. Chin.  The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. , 1998 .

[40]  Michel Tenenhaus,et al.  PLS path modeling , 2005, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[41]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[42]  Alon Peled,et al.  When transparency and collaboration collide: The USA Open Data program , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[43]  David C. Yen,et al.  G2G information sharing among government agencies , 2014, Inf. Manag..

[44]  Calvin M. L. Chan,et al.  From Open Data to Open Innovation Strategies: Creating E-Services Using Open Government Data , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[45]  Judy A. Siguaw,et al.  Formative versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration , 2006 .

[46]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[47]  Lee Sproull,et al.  What's Mine Is Ours, or Is It? A Study of Attitudes about Information Sharing , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[48]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[49]  Xu Ji-sheng.  Determinants of User Acceptance of the E-Government Services——the Case of Online Tax Filing and Payment System , 2008 .

[50]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research , 2014 .

[51]  Sören Auer,et al.  A systematic review of open government data initiatives , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[52]  Theresa A. Pardo,et al.  Exploring the Motive for Data Publication in Open Data Initiative: Linking Intention to Action , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[53]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[54]  K. Mardia.  Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications , 1970 .

[55]  Frank Bannister,et al.  Barriers to open data release: A view from the top , 2014, Inf. Polity.

[56]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[57]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[58]  Cheryl Burke Jarvis,et al.  The problem of measurement model misspecification in behavioral and organizational research and some recommended solutions. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[59]  Tim Davies,et al.  2013 Open Data Barometer , 2013 .

[60]  Chris J. Martin.  Barriers to the Open Government Data Agenda: Taking a Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[61]  J. Fountain.  Building the Virtual State: Information Technology and Institutional Change , 2001 .

[62]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Benefits, Adoption Barriers and Myths of Open Data and Open Government , 2012, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[63]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  Exploring the determinants of cross-boundary information sharing in the public sector: An e-Government case study in Taiwan , 2014, J. Inf. Sci..

[64]  Maxat Kassen,et al.  A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project , 2013, Gov. Inf. Q..

[65]  Tung-Mou Yang,et al.  To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data , 2015, J. Inf. Sci..

[66]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[67]  Silja Eckartz,et al.  A Decision Model for Data Sharing , 2014, EGOV.

[68]  James F. Wilson.  Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It , 1990 .

[69]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Open data disclosure and use : critical factors from a case study , 2015 .

[70]  Sharon S. Dawes,et al.  Stewardship and usefulness: Policy principles for information-based transparency , 2010, Gov. Inf. Q..

[71]  J. Ramon Gil-Garcia,et al.  Using Partial Least Squares in Digital Government Research , 2008 .

[72]  Yogesh Kumar Dwivedi,et al.  Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology , 2015, Gov. Inf. Q..

[73]  M. W. Hartog,et al.  Open data within governmental organisations : Effects, benefits and challenges of the implementation process , 2014 .

[74]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Specifying Formative Constructs in Information Systems Research , 2007, MIS Q..

[75]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  Socio-technical Impediments of Open Data , 2012 .

[76]  Sunil Choenni,et al.  On the barriers for local government releasing open data , 2014, Gov. Inf. Q..

[77]  Yannis Charalabidis,et al.  Issues and Guiding Principles for Opening Governmental Judicial Research Data , 2012, International Conference on Electronic Government.

[78]  Howard E. Aldrich,et al.  Organizations evolving (2nd ed.). , 2006 .

[79]  Andreas Eggert,et al.  Exploring the Impact of Sales Technology on Salesperson Performance: A Task-Base d Approach , 2011 .

[80]  Matti Rossi,et al.  Mobile Games: Analyzing the Needs and Values of the Consumers , 2010 .

[81]  Niels Bjørn-Andersen,et al.  Data-Driven Innovation through Open Government Data , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[82]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  Shaping Local Open Data Initiatives: Politics and Implications , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[83]  Peter Parycek,et al.  Open Government Data Implementation Evaluation , 2014, J. Theor. Appl. Electron. Commer. Res..

[84]  Debashis Kushary,et al.  Bootstrap Methods and Their Application , 2000, Technometrics.

[85]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[86]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[87]  M. Janssen,et al.  A comparison of national open data policies: lessons learned , 2015 .

[88]  S. Dawes.  Interagency information sharing: Expected benefits, manageable risks , 1996 .