Student Perspectives on Video-Based Learning in CDIO-Based Project Courses

This paper aims at demonstrating the applicability of video learning in CDIO based project courses and at evaluating to what extent it benefits students. The courses are Machine Elements (PPU210), Product Planning - Needs and Opportunities (PPU085) and Engineering Design and Optimization (PPU190) in the Mechanical Engineering programme at Chalmers University of Technology. The research was carried out by first creating a set of videos for selected topics in three courses. In total, 22 videos were created including topics such as “Benchmarking”, “SWOT”, and “Prototype lab equipment instructions”. The learning outcomes of the video lectures were mapped to the CDIO syllabus. A blended learning environment was developed, i.e. the videos were utilised as additional support alongside existing learning activities. The videos were then used in the courses and the students’ feedbacks collected through a dedicated questionnaire, the regular course evaluation survey, and in student-teacher group meetings during and after the courses. The collected data was analysed to produce inferences about the applicability and utility of the video lectures. The resulting analysis shows the students’ preferences regarding the evaluated video lectures and instructions. The students find videos more appealing compared to traditional lectures. One of the main benefits highlighted is the possibility of watching the videos in parallel to the design-build-test project execution rather having the classroom lecture only. This helps in reinforcing concepts, and results in less dependency on supervisors during the project execution. Videos proved to be suitable for creating a blended learning environment and improved the perceived learning experience for the students. In order to maximize student satisfaction and interaction with the videos, the videos should be short and closely aligned to the other learning activities. The paper also suggests future improvements to be carried out for video-based learning in the courses, and proposes an easy adaptable way for teachers to develop video material.

[1]  Jörg Schminder,et al.  Learning by teaching: Student developed material for self-directed studies , 2016 .

[2]  Lindsay Oishi Did You Just See that? Online Video Sites Can Jumpstart Lessons. , 2007 .

[3]  Philip J. Guo,et al.  How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos , 2014, L@S.

[4]  Chih-Ming Chen,et al.  Intelligent web-based learning system with personalized learning path guidance , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Richard M. Felder,et al.  The Many Faces of Inductive Teaching and Learning , 2007 .

[6]  Kristina Edström,et al.  PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development , 2014 .

[7]  Lars Hammarstrand,et al.  Flipping a PhD course using movies from a MOOC , 2015 .

[8]  Javier Macías Guarasa,et al.  A project-based learning approach to design electronic systems curricula , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[9]  Tom Adawi,et al.  Using learning analytics in virtual learning environments , 2015 .

[10]  K. Hambridge Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[11]  Johan Malmqvist,et al.  Rethinking Engineering Education - The CDIO Approach , 2007 .

[12]  Tom Adawi,et al.  Students' "resonance broadening" to teaching or how to improve students' learning using flipped classrooms , 2016 .

[13]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice--foreword , 2004 .

[14]  Tom Adawi,et al.  Comparing Student Activity and Performance in the Classroom and a Virtual Learning Environment , 2016 .

[15]  Rami Viksilä EFFECTIVENESS OF VIDEO LECTURING IN ICT LEARNING , 2013 .

[16]  Kristina Edström,et al.  Rethinking engineering education - The CDIO approach, 2nd ed , 2014 .

[17]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Inductive Teaching and Learning Methods: Definitions, Comparisons, and Research Bases , 2006 .

[18]  Tracy Volz,et al.  Implementing and Assessing a Flipped Classroom Model for First-Year Engineering Design. , 2016 .

[19]  Thomas A. Brush,et al.  Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Steve Hand,et al.  The Effect of Mobile Phone Screen Size on Video Based Learning , 2008, J. Softw..

[21]  Ulrik Schroeder,et al.  The State of Video-Based Learning: A Review and Future Perspectives , 2014 .

[22]  D. Garrison,et al.  Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education , 2004, Internet High. Educ..

[23]  J. Biggs Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment , 1996 .

[24]  Mikael Cronhjort,et al.  STUDENT PERSPECTIVES ON FLIPPED CLASSROOMS INENGINEERING EDUCATION , 2016 .

[25]  Annemarie S. Palincsar,et al.  Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning , 1991 .