Mechanisms of multidimensional grouping, fusion, and search in avian texture discrimination

[1]  R. Cook,et al.  Same-different texture discrimination and concept learning by pigeons. , 1995 .

[2]  D. Blough.  Effects on search speed of the probability of target-distractor combinations , 1993 .

[3]  R. Cook.  The Experimental Analysis of Cognition in Animals , 1993 .

[4]  R. Cook.  Acquisition and transfer of visual texture discriminations by pigeons. , 1992 .

[5]  P. Blough.  Detectability and choice during visual search: joint effects of sequential priming and discriminability , 1992 .

[6]  S. Shettleworth,et al.  Detection of cryptic prey: search image or search rate? , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  J. Wolfe.  “Effortless” texture segmentation and “parallel” visual search are not the same thing , 1992, Vision Research.

[8]  P. Blough.  Selective attention and search images in pigeons. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[9]  L. Marks,et al.  Perceptual primacy of dimensions: support for a model of dimensional interaction. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  D. Blough,et al.  Feature-based search asymmetries in pigeons and humans , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[14]  T Poggio,et al.  Parallel integration of vision modules. , 1988, Science.

[15]  H Pashler,et al.  Cross-dimensional interaction and texture segregation , 1988, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  A. Treisman.  Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[17]  T. Guilford,et al.  Search images not proven: A reappraisal of recent evidence , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Visual search for targets defined by combinations of color, shape, and size: An examination of the task constraints on feature and conjunction searches , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  R. P. Gendron.  Searching for cryptic prey: evidence for optimal search rates and the formation of search images in quail , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[21]  R. Shepard.  Ecological constraints on internal representation: resonant kinematics of perceiving, imagining, thinking, and dreaming. , 1984, Psychological review.

[22]  P. Blough.  Visual search in pigeons: Effects of memory set size and display variables , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[23]  A. Bond,et al.  Visual search and selection of natural stimuli in the pigeon: the attention threshold hypothesis. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[24]  J. Staddon,et al.  Searching for Cryptic Prey: The Effect of Search Rate , 1983, The American Naturalist.

[25]  B. Julesz.  Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[26]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  J E Hoffman,et al.  A two-stage model of visual search , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[28]  D. Blough.  Effects of the number and form of stimuli on visual search in the pigeon. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[29]  A C Kamil,et al.  Search Image Formation in the Blue Jay (Cyanocitta cristata) , 1979, Science.

[30]  D. Blough.  Visual search in the pigeon: hunt and peck method. , 1977, Science.

[31]  A. Kamil,et al.  Visual Detection of Cryptic Prey by Blue Jays (Cyanocitta cristata) , 1977, Science.

[32]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Interaction of stimulus dimensions in concept and choice processes , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[33]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[34]  J. Beck.  Effect of orientation and of shape similarity on perceptual grouping , 1966 .

[35]  L. Tinbergen.  The natural control of insects in pinewoods. I. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds , 1960 .

[36]  W. Todd Maddox,et al.  Perceptual and decisional separability. , 1992 .

[37]  R. Cook.  Dimensional organization and texture discrimination in pigeons , 1992 .

[38]  W. K. Honig.  Discrimination by pigeons of mixture and uniformity in arrays of stimulus elements. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[39]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[40]  D S Blough,et al.  Odd-item search in pigeons: display size and transfer effects. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[41]  S. Dehaene.  Discriminability and dimensionality effects invisual search for featural conjunctions: A functional pop-out , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[42]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[43]  Michael F. Brown.  Dissociation of stimulus compounds by pigeons. , 1987 .

[44]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[45]  D. A. Riley,et al.  Multidimensional psychophysics and selective attention in animals. , 1976 .

[46]  R. Pearson.  The avian brain , 1972 .

[47]  L. Tinbergen.  The Natural Control of Insects in Pinewoods , 1960 .