Direct-to-Consumer Racial Admixture Tests and Beliefs About Essential Racial Differences

Although at first relatively disinterested in race, modern genomic research has increasingly turned attention to racial variations. We examine a prominent example of this focus—direct-to-consumer racial admixture tests—and ask how information about the methods and results of these tests in news media may affect beliefs in racial differences. The reification hypothesis proposes that by emphasizing a genetic basis for race, thereby reifying race as a biological reality, the tests increase beliefs that whites and blacks are essentially different. The challenge hypothesis suggests that by describing differences between racial groups as continua rather than sharp demarcations, the results produced by admixture tests break down racial categories and reduce beliefs in racial differences. A nationally representative survey experiment (N = 526) provided clear support for the reification hypothesis. The results suggest that an unintended consequence of the genomic revolution may be to reinvigorate age-old beliefs in essential racial differences.

[1]  Patrick Dattalo,et al.  Statistical Power Analysis , 2008 .

[2]  A. Lippman.  Led (astray) by genetic maps: the cartography of the human genome and health care. , 1992, Social science & medicine.

[3]  Patricia Goodson,et al.  The DNA Mystique: The Gene as a Cultural Icon , 1997 .

[4]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[5]  John Novembre,et al.  Inferring genetic ancestry: opportunities, challenges, and implications. , 2010, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Social Cognition, from Brains to Culture , 1984 .

[7]  I. Luckey.  : American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass , 1995 .

[8]  Thomas M. Shapiro,et al.  Black Wealth, White Wealth: A New Perspective on Racial Inequality. , 1995 .

[9]  Melissa J. Williams,et al.  Biological conceptions of race and the motivation to cross racial boundaries. , 2008, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  N. Haslam,et al.  Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement , 2006 .

[11]  C. Carter Smith.  The faces of America , 1988 .

[12]  J. Keller.  In genes we trust: the biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  M. Rothbart,et al.  Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? , 1992 .

[14]  J. H. Fujimura,et al.  Race, Genetics, and Disease: Questions of Evidence, Matters of Consequence , 2008 .

[15]  Jennifer L. Bevan,et al.  Exploration of the impact of messages about genes and race on lay attitudes , 2004, Clinical genetics.

[16]  D. Massey.  American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass , 1993 .

[17]  Toshihiro Tanaka.  The International HapMap Project , 2003, Nature.

[18]  Duana Fullwiley.  The Molecularization of Race: Institutionalizing Human Difference in Pharmacogenetics Practice , 2007 .

[19]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[20]  A. Nelson.  Bio Science , 2008, Social studies of science.

[21]  Joshua F. J. Inwood.  Racist America: Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations , 2015 .

[22]  C. Hoffman,et al.  Gender stereotypes : perception or rationalization? , 1990 .

[23]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  A Comparative Investigation of Seven Implicit Measures of Social Cognition , 2012 .

[24]  Michael Omi,et al.  Racial formation in the United States : from the 1960s to the 1980s , 1988 .

[25]  D. Nelkin,et al.  The DNA Mystique: The Gene As a Cultural Icon , 1995 .

[26]  James R. Kluegel,et al.  Trends in whites' explanations of the black-white gap in socioeconomic status, 1977-1989 , 1990 .

[27]  T. Duster.  The molecular reinscription of race: unanticipated issues in biotechnology and forensic science , 2006 .

[28]  F. Goza.  Race in Another America: The Significance of Skin Color in Brazil , 2006 .

[29]  C. Martin,et al.  Folk Theories about Sex and Race Differences , 1995 .

[30]  B. Bates,et al.  How lay people respond to messages about genetics, health, and race , 2005, Clinical genetics.

[31]  Olesya Govorun,et al.  An inkblot for attitudes: affect misattribution as implicit measurement. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[32]  J Tudor-Hart,et al.  On the nature of prejudice. , 1961, The Eugenics review.

[33]  Edward Telles,et al.  Race in Another America: The Significance of Skin Color in Brazil , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[34]  P. Ossorio,et al.  The Science and Business of Genetic Ancestry Testing , 2007, Science.

[35]  A. Leroi.  A family tree in every gene , 2005, Journal of Genetics.

[36]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: the implicit association test. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  The Genomic Revolution and Beliefs about Essential Racial Differences , 2013, American sociological review.