Modeling Endothelial Cell Loss After Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty: Data From 5 Years of Follow-up

Purpose: To report 5-year outcomes for graft survival and endothelial cell survival after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) including regression modeling for cell survival over time. Methods: This is a single-institution, retrospective, consecutive interventional series of 210 primary DSEK grafts operated for low-to-moderate risk indications, specifically Fuchs dystrophy and bullous keratopathy. Primary outcomes were cumulative graft survival and % endothelial cell loss from 3 months through 5 years; the secondary outcome was to trend endothelial cell density over time by least-squares and mixed nonlinear modeling. Results: Cumulative graft survival was high at 99%, 98%, and 94% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Mean endothelial cell loss was (mean ± SD) 44% ± 16%, 56% ± 17%, and 67% ± 13% at 1, 3, and 5 years. The trend in mean endothelial cell density over time by least square regression was accurately and parsimoniously described by a straight line taking earliest values (3 mo) through to 5 years, with a rate of cell loss of 148 ± 13 cells·mm−2·yr−1. Higher-order polynomial and exponential models did not provide a closer regression fit. Mixed nonlinear modeling using exponential decay equations confirmed a relatively stable rate of cell loss for DSEK from 3 months through to 5 years, in contrast to penetrating keratoplasty models using similar techniques in previous studies. Conclusions: DSEK graft survival is high in our series through 5 years. Endothelial cell loss occurs at a relatively constant albeit low-grade rate from the earliest postoperative measurements through 5 years.

[1]  J. Mehta,et al.  Five-Year Graft Survival Comparing Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty and Penetrating Keratoplasty. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[2]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty for Fuchs' Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy: Five-Year Results of a Prospective Study. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[3]  D. Böhringer,et al.  Outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty, Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty and penetrating keratoplasty from a single centre study , 2016, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[4]  R. Schultze,et al.  Impact of Donor Characteristics on 2-Year Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Outcomes in Patients With Fuchs Endothelial Dystrophy , 2015, Cornea.

[5]  E. Hollick,et al.  Center and Surgeon Effect on Outcomes of Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Penetrating Keratoplasty in the United Kingdom. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[6]  Sanjay V. Patel,et al.  A mathematical model to predict endothelial cell density following penetrating keratoplasty with selective dropout from graft failure. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[7]  D. Larkin,et al.  Center and surgeon effect on outcomes of endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in the United Kingdom. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[8]  D. Coster,et al.  A comparison of lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty outcomes: a registry study. , 2014, Ophthalmology.

[9]  F. Carley,et al.  The suitability of corneas stored by organ culture for penetrating keratoplasty and influence of donor and recipient factors on 5-year graft survival. , 2014, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  J. Mehta,et al.  Endothelial cell counts after Descemet’s stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty versus penetrating keratoplasty in Asian eyes , 2012, Clinical ophthalmology.

[11]  Vinod Gangwani,et al.  A prospective study comparing EndoGlide and Busin glide insertion techniques in descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty. , 2012, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  M. Gorovoy,et al.  Long-term Results of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty , 2011, Cornea.

[13]  David A. Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty five-year graft survival and endothelial cell loss. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[14]  W. Armitage,et al.  Preservation of Human Cornea , 2011, Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy.

[15]  Daniel T. L. Shek,et al.  Longitudinal Data Analyses Using Linear Mixed Models in SPSS: Concepts, Procedures and Illustrations , 2011, TheScientificWorldJournal.

[16]  S. Böhringer,et al.  Long-Term Graft Survival in Penetrating Keratoplasty: The Biexponential Model of Chronic Endothelial Cell Loss Revisited , 2010, Cornea.

[17]  S. Debanne,et al.  Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty outcomes compared with penetrating keratoplasty from the Cornea Donor Study. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[18]  Roni M. Shtein,et al.  Ophthalmic Technology Assessment Descemet ’ s Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty : Safety and Outcomes , 2022 .

[19]  R. Beck,et al.  Recipient risk factors for graft failure in the cornea donor study. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[20]  Marianne O Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 200 eyes: Early challenges and techniques to enhance donor adherence , 2006, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  F. Price,et al.  Descemet's stripping with endothelial keratoplasty in 50 eyes: a refractive neutral corneal transplant. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[22]  Andrew D Dick,et al.  Predicting endothelial cell loss and long-term corneal graft survival. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  D. Böhringer,et al.  Influencing factors on chronic endothelial cell loss characterised in a homogeneous group of patients , 2002, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[24]  W M Bourne,et al.  Central corneal endothelial cell changes over a ten-year period. , 1997, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  W M Bourne,et al.  Corneal endothelium five years after transplantation. , 1994, American journal of ophthalmology.