Soil resistance and recovery during neotropical forest succession

The recovery of soil conditions is crucial for successful ecosystem restoration and, hence, for achieving the goals of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration. Here, we assess how soils resist forest conversion and agricultural land use, and how soils recover during subsequent tropical forest succession on abandoned agricultural fields. Our overarching question is how soil resistance and recovery depend on local conditions such as climate, soil type and land-use history. For 300 plots in 21 sites across the Neotropics, we used a chronosequence approach in which we sampled soils from two depths in old-growth forests, agricultural fields (i.e. crop fields and pastures), and secondary forests that differ in age (1–95 years) since abandonment. We measured six soil properties using a standardized sampling design and laboratory analyses. Soil resistance strongly depended on local conditions. Croplands and sites on high-activity clay (i.e. high fertility) show strong increases in bulk density and decreases in pH, carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) during deforestation and subsequent agricultural use. Resistance is lower in such sites probably because of a sharp decline in fine root biomass in croplands in the upper soil layers, and a decline in litter input from formerly productive old-growth forest (on high-activity clays). Soil recovery also strongly depended on local conditions. During forest succession, high-activity clays and croplands decreased most strongly in bulk density and increased in C and N, possibly because of strongly compacted soils with low C and N after cropland abandonment, and because of rapid vegetation recovery in high-activity clays leading to greater fine root growth and litter input. Furthermore, sites at low precipitation decreased in pH, whereas sites at high precipitation increased in N and decreased in C : N ratio. Extractable phosphorus (P) did not recover during succession, suggesting increased P limitation as forests age. These results indicate that no single solution exists for effective soil restoration and that local site conditions should determine the restoration strategies. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Understanding forest landscape restoration: reinforcing scientific foundations for the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration’.

[1]  Annette M. Trierweiler,et al.  Soil biogeochemistry across Central and South American tropical dry forests , 2021 .

[2]  Julia P. G. Jones,et al.  Forest regeneration can positively contribute to local hydrological ecosystem services: Implications for forest landscape restoration , 2021, Journal of Applied Ecology.

[3]  J. Six,et al.  Soil Nutrient Depletion and Tree Functional Composition Shift Following Repeated Clearing in Secondary Forests of the Congo Basin , 2021 .

[4]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Indicators of integrative recovery of vegetation, soil and microclimate in successional fields of a tropical dry forest , 2021 .

[5]  M. Obersteiner,et al.  Global priority areas for ecosystem restoration , 2020, Nature.

[6]  E. Veldkamp,et al.  Deforestation and reforestation impacts on soils in the tropics , 2020, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment.

[7]  T. Kuyper,et al.  Eco-functionality of organic matter in soils , 2020, Plant and Soil.

[8]  L. Lai,et al.  A global meta-analysis of livestock grazing impacts on soil properties , 2020, PloS one.

[9]  S. Reed,et al.  Biological nitrogen fixation across major biomes in Latin America: Patterns and global change effects. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[10]  I. Jones,et al.  Above- and belowground carbon stocks are decoupled in secondary tropical forests and are positively related to forest age and soil nutrients respectively. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[11]  J. C. von Fischer,et al.  Rapid nitrogen fixation by canopy microbiome in tropical forest determined by both phosphorus and molybdenum. , 2019, Ecology.

[12]  D. Menge,et al.  Symbiotic N fixation is sufficient to support net aboveground biomass accumulation in a humid tropical forest , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[13]  E. Davidson,et al.  Biogeochemical recuperation of lowland tropical forest during succession. , 2019, Ecology.

[14]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Biodiversity recovery of Neotropical secondary forests , 2019, Science Advances.

[15]  P. Kardol,et al.  Effects of agricultural intensification on soil biodiversity and implications for ecosystem functioning: A meta-analysis , 2019, Advances in Agronomy.

[16]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Nitrogen fixer abundance has no effect on biomass recovery during tropical secondary forest succession , 2018 .

[17]  José Luis Hernández-Stefanoni,et al.  Legume abundance along successional and rainfall gradients in Neotropical forests , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[18]  D. Sheil.  Forests, atmospheric water and an uncertain future: the new biology of the global water cycle , 2018, Forest Ecosystems.

[19]  James S Clark,et al.  Associations among arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and seedlings are predicted to change with tree successional status. , 2018, Ecology.

[20]  P. Balvanera,et al.  Resilience of Soil Properties to Land‐Use Change in a Tropical Dry Forest Ecosystem , 2018 .

[21]  Graciela Metternicht,et al.  Land in balance: The scientific conceptual framework for Land Degradation Neutrality , 2018 .

[22]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  Carbon Accumulation in Neotropical Dry Secondary Forests: The Roles of Forest Age and Tree Dominance and Diversity , 2018, Ecosystems.

[23]  Víctor Arroyo-Rodríguez,et al.  Soil‐mediated filtering organizes tree assemblages in regenerating tropical forests , 2018 .

[24]  K. Oost,et al.  An assessment of the global impact of 21st century land use change on soil erosion , 2017, Nature Communications.

[25]  J. Zimmerman,et al.  Biodiversity and climate determine the functioning of neotropical forests. , 2017 .

[26]  Erika Marin-Spiotta,et al.  Ecosystem Processes and Biogeochemical Cycles in Secondary Tropical Forest Succession , 2017 .

[27]  L. Poorter,et al.  Abiotic and biotic drivers of biomass change in a Neotropical forest , 2017 .

[28]  J. R. D. Lima,et al.  Soil organic carbon, microbial biomass and enzyme activities responses to natural regeneration in a tropical dry region in Northeast Brazil , 2017 .

[29]  E. Sampaio,et al.  Biological nitrogen fixation in tropical dry forests with different legume diversity and abundance , 2017, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[30]  K. Anderson‐Teixeira,et al.  Carbon dynamics of mature and regrowth tropical forests derived from a pantropical database (TropForC‐db) , 2016, Global change biology.

[31]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Carbon sequestration potential of second-growth forest regeneration in the Latin American tropics , 2016, Science Advances.

[32]  O. Seguel,et al.  Direct measurement and prediction of bulk density on alluvial soils of central Chile , 2016 .

[33]  Susan G. Letcher,et al.  Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests , 2016, Nature.

[34]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Long-term decline of the Amazon carbon sink , 2015, Nature.

[35]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[36]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[37]  P. D’Odorico,et al.  Positive feedbacks between phosphorus deposition and forest canopy trapping, evidence from Southern Mexico , 2013 .

[38]  Jefferson S. Hall,et al.  Key role of symbiotic dinitrogen fixation in tropical forest secondary succession , 2013, Nature.

[39]  J. Wendt,et al.  An equivalent soil mass procedure for monitoring soil organic carbon in multiple soil layers , 2013 .

[40]  Sapna Sharma,et al.  Carbon storage in successional and plantation forest soils: a tropical analysis , 2013 .

[41]  G. Gleixner.  Soil organic matter dynamics: a biological perspective derived from the use of compound-specific isotopes studies , 2013, Ecological Research.

[42]  Bradley A. Miller,et al.  Precision of Soil Particle Size Analysis using Laser Diffractometry , 2012 .

[43]  J. Raich,et al.  Rapidly growing tropical trees mobilize remarkable amounts of nitrogen, in ways that differ surprisingly among species , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  P. D’Odorico,et al.  Effect of repeated deforestation on vegetation dynamics for phosphorus‐limited tropical forests , 2012 .

[45]  S. Gerber,et al.  Large losses of inorganic nitrogen from tropical rainforests suggest a lack of nitrogen limitation. , 2012, Ecology letters.

[46]  A. Don,et al.  Impact of tropical land‐use change on soil organic carbon stocks – a meta‐analysis , 2011 .

[47]  E. Veldkamp,et al.  Geographic bias of field observations of soil carbon stocks with tropical land-use changes precludes spatial extrapolation , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  James W. C. White,et al.  Multi-element regulation of the tropical forest carbon cycle , 2011 .

[49]  D. Wardle,et al.  The use of chronosequences in studies of ecological succession and soil development , 2010 .

[50]  Stephen Porder,et al.  Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[51]  Alexander R. Barron,et al.  The Nitrogen Paradox in Tropical Forest Ecosystems , 2009 .

[52]  W. Silver,et al.  Soil organic matter dynamics during 80 years of reforestation of tropical pastures , 2009 .

[53]  W. Silver,et al.  Litterfall and Decomposition in Relation to Soil Carbon Pools Along a Secondary Forest Chronosequence in Puerto Rico , 2008, Ecosystems.

[54]  Eric A. Davidson,et al.  Recuperation of nitrogen cycling in Amazonian forests following agricultural abandonment , 2007, Nature.

[55]  Stephen P. Hubbell,et al.  Soil nutrients influence spatial distributions of tropical tree species , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[56]  J. Lamarque,et al.  Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales: A multimodel evaluation , 2006 .

[57]  D. Sigman,et al.  Isotopic evidence for large gaseous nitrogen losses from tropical rainforests. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[58]  Timothy Beach,et al.  Impacts of the ancient Maya on soils and soil erosion in the central Maya Lowlands , 2006 .

[59]  J. Etchevers,et al.  Soil C and N dynamics in primary and secondary seasonally dry tropical forests in Mexico , 2005 .

[60]  R. F. Castillo,et al.  Soil Changes During Secondary Succession in a Tropical Montane Cloud Forest Area , 2005 .

[61]  K. Treseder,et al.  Fine roots, arbuscular mycorrhizal hyphae and soil nutrients in four neotropical rain forests: patterns across large geographic distances. , 2004, The New phytologist.

[62]  Marie-France Dignac,et al.  Is soil carbon mostly root carbon? Mechanisms for a specific stabilisation , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[63]  E. Davidson,et al.  NITROGEN AND PHOSPHORUS LIMITATION OF BIOMASS GROWTH IN A TROPICAL SECONDARY FOREST , 2004 .

[64]  P. Grierson,et al.  Phosphorus mobilization in agroforestry: Organic anions, phosphatase activity and phosphorus fractions in the rhizosphere , 2004, Plant and Soil.

[65]  N. Bolan,et al.  Processes of soil acidification during nitrogen cycling with emphasis on legume based pastures , 1991, Plant and Soil.

[66]  Dengsheng Lu,et al.  Linking Amazonian secondary succession forest growth to soil properties , 2002 .

[67]  R. Gifford,et al.  Soil carbon stocks and land use change: a meta analysis , 2002 .

[68]  W. Schlesinger,et al.  CHANGES IN SOIL PHOSPHORUS DURING 200 YEARS OF SHIFTING CULTIVATION IN INDONESIA , 2001 .

[69]  E. B. Rastetter,et al.  Resource Optimization and Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation , 2001, Ecosystems.

[70]  Brian G. Wolff,et al.  Forecasting Agriculturally Driven Global Environmental Change , 2001, Science.

[71]  V. Hallaire,et al.  The role of macrofauna in the transformation and reversibility of soil structure of an oxisol in the process of forest to pasture conversion , 2001 .

[72]  E. Davidson,et al.  Soil carbon dynamics in regrowing forest of eastern Amazonia , 1999 .

[73]  D. Schimel,et al.  Global patterns of terrestrial biological nitrogen (N2) fixation in natural ecosystems , 1999 .

[74]  IÂ Pl.  Soil carbon dynamics in regrowing forest of eastern Amazonia , 1999 .

[75]  R. Mendelsohn,et al.  Managing forest fallows: improving the economics of swidden agriculture. , 1997 .

[76]  E. Davidson,et al.  Belowground cycling of carbon in forests and pastures of eastern Amazonia , 1995 .

[77]  A. Gentry.  Seasonally Dry Tropical Forests: Diversity and floristic composition of neotropical dry forests , 1995 .

[78]  Thomas H. Painter,et al.  Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils , 1994 .

[79]  Eric A. Davidson,et al.  Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils , 1993 .

[80]  D. Tessier,et al.  Changes in soil pore-space distribution following deforestation and revegetation: An example from the Central Amazon Basin, Brazil , 1991 .

[81]  R. Lal.  Effects of macrofauna on soil properties in tropical ecosystems , 1988 .

[82]  Peter M. Vitousek,et al.  Litterfall, Nutrient Cycling, and Nutrient Limitation in Tropical Forests , 1984 .

[83]  J. P. Riley,et al.  A modified single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters , 1962 .

[84]  C. Kellogg.  The Soil under Shifting Cultivation , 1962 .