On the Semantics of the Subset Principle

Virtually all generative accounts of language development assume that syntactic acquisition is guided by a learnability constraint called the Subset Principle (SP). In essence, SP forces learners to initially select the value of a parameter that generates the smallest possible language. Recent work on the acquisition of semantics suggests that there also are semantic subset problems; therefore, one needs a Semantic Subset Principle (SSP) to solve these problems. This article shows that (a) to the extent that semantic subset problems exist, the SSP is not the correct solution to them and (b) that semantic subset problems most likely do not exist in the first place. These conclusions have important implications for theories of the acquisition of semantic knowledge and for the study of language acquisition more generally. First, they provide a basis for delimiting the class of problems that theories of the acquisition of semantics ought to be responsible for. Second, these conclusions underscore the fact that data from empirical investigations of child language can be brought to bear on the formulation of linguistic theory.

[1]  McMahon Jeffrey,et al.  Quantifier Raising in 4-year-olds , 2004 .

[2]  M. Rita Manzini,et al.  Parameters and Learnability in Binding Theory , 1987 .

[3]  Children Want to Access Every Interpretation Adults Do: Children’s Knowledge of Ambiguity in ACD Constructions , 2004 .

[4]  Kevin B Paterson,et al.  Children's comprehension of sentences with focus particles , 2003, Cognition.

[5]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Minimalist Program , 1992 .

[6]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  Why children aren't universally successful with quantification , 2006 .

[7]  Andrea Gualmini,et al.  The Role of Partitivity in Child Language , 2004 .

[8]  Mark C. Baker.  The Atoms of Language , 1987 .

[9]  Jeffrey Lidz,et al.  The Scope of Isomorphism: Turning Adults Into Children , 2003 .

[10]  S. Crain,et al.  Language Acquisition , 2008 .

[11]  Julien Musolino,et al.  Universal Grammar and the Acquisition of Semantic Knowledge: An Experimental Investigation into the Acquisition of Quantifier-Negation Interaction in English , 1999 .

[12]  M. Black,et al.  Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege , 1953 .

[13]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Explanation in Linguistics: The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition , 1982 .

[14]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[15]  Liliane Haegeman,et al.  Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1991 .

[16]  S. Waxman,et al.  What infants know about syntax but couldn't have learned: experimental evidence for syntactic structure at 18 months , 2003, Cognition.

[17]  Carlo Cecchetto,et al.  Introduction to Government and Binding Theory , 1996 .

[18]  Irina A. Sekerina,et al.  The kindergarten-path effect: studying on-line sentence processing in young children , 1999, Cognition.

[19]  Norbert Hornstein,et al.  Logical Form: From Gb to Minimalism , 1995 .

[20]  J. Musolino,et al.  Children's command of quantification , 2002, Cognition.

[21]  Joseph Aoun,et al.  The Syntax of Scope , 1995 .

[22]  Chung-hye Han,et al.  V-Raising and Grammar Competition in Korean: Evidence from Negation and Quantifier Scope , 2007, Linguistic Inquiry.

[23]  Robert C. Berwick,et al.  The acquisition of syntactic knowledge , 1985 .

[24]  Stephen Crain,et al.  Navigating negative quantificational space , 2000 .

[25]  I. Noveck.  When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicature , 2001, Cognition.

[26]  Andrea Gualmini,et al.  Some knowledge children don't lack , 2004 .