The advanced glaucoma intervention study, 6: effect of cataract on visual field and visual acuity. The AGIS Investigators.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the effect of cataract on visual function and the role of cataract in explaining a race-treatment interaction in outcomes of glaucoma surgery. METHODS The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) enrolled 332 black patients (451 eyes) and 249 white patients (325 eyes) with advanced glaucoma. Eyes were randomly assigned to an argon laser trabeculoplasty (ALT)-trabeculectomy-trabeculectomy sequence or a trabeculectomy-ALT-trabeculectomy sequence. From the AGIS experience with cataract surgery during follow-up, we estimated the expected change in visual function scores from before cataract surgery to after cataract surgery. Then, for eyes with cataract not removed, we used these estimates of expected change to adjust visual function scores for the presumed effects of cataract. In turn, we used the adjusted scores to obtain cataract-adjusted main outcome measures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Average percent of eyes with decrease of visual field (APDVF) and average percent of eyes with decrease of visual acuity (APDVA). RESULTS Within the 2 months before cataract surgery, visual acuity was better in eyes of white patients than of black patients by an average of approximately 2 lines on the visual acuity test chart. Cataract surgery improved visual acuity and visual field defect scores, with the amounts of improvement greater when preoperative visual acuity was lower. Adjustments for cataract brought about the following relative reductions: for APDVF, a relative reduction of 5% to 11% in black patients and 9% to 11% in white patients; for APDVA, a relative reduction of 45% to 49% in black patients and 31% to 38% in white patients; and for the APDVF and APDVA race-treatment interactions, relative reductions of 25% and 45%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS On average, visual function scores improved after cataract surgery. The findings of reduced race-treatment interactions after adjustment for cataract do not alter our earlier conclusion that the AGIS 7-year results support use of the ALT-trabeculectomy-trabeculectomy sequence for black patients and of the trabeculectomy-ALT-trabeculectomy sequence for white patients without life-threatening health problems. The choice of treatment should take into account individual patient characteristics and needs.

[1]  Douglas R. Anderson,et al.  The effectiveness of intraocular pressure reduction in the treatment of normal-tension glaucoma. Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  D. Budenz,et al.  The effects of cataract extraction on the visual field of eyes with chronic open-angle glaucoma. , 1998, American journal of ophthalmology.

[3]  The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 4. Comparison of treatment outcomes within race. Seven-year results. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[4]  The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 3. Baseline characteristics of black and white patients. , 1998, Ophthalmology.

[5]  L. Martin Cataract and high-pass resolution perimetry. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[6]  J. Katz,et al.  Effect of cataract extraction on the results of automated perimetry in glaucoma. , 1996, Archives of ophthalmology.

[7]  D E Gaasterland,et al.  The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS): 1. Study design and methods and baseline characteristics of study patients. , 1994, Controlled clinical trials.

[8]  Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. , 1994, Ophthalmology.

[9]  M. C. Leske,et al.  The Lens Opacities Classification System III , 1993 .

[10]  J Katz,et al.  Comparison of analytic algorithms for detecting glaucomatous visual field loss. , 1991, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  J Katz,et al.  Racial differences in the cause-specific prevalence of blindness in east Baltimore. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[12]  Byron L. Lam,et al.  Effect of cataract on automated perimetry. , 1991, Ophthalmology.

[13]  K L Linton,et al.  Assessment of cataracts from photographs in the Beaver Dam Eye Study. , 1990, Ophthalmology.

[14]  A. Crichton,et al.  Lens opacity as a predictor of visual field impairment due to cataract. , 1990, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[15]  D. Byar,et al.  Using permutation tests and bootstrap confidence limits to analyze repeated events data from clinical trials. , 1989, Controlled clinical trials.

[16]  J. Flammer,et al.  Quantifying visual field damage caused by cataract. , 1988, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  L T Chylack,et al.  Lens Opacities Classification System. , 1988, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  F. Ederer,et al.  Epidemiologic associations with nuclear, cortical, and posterior subcapsular cataracts. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[20]  F L Ferris,et al.  Standardized illumination for visual acuity testing in clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[21]  F. Ferris,et al.  New visual acuity charts for clinical research. , 1982, American journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  S. R. Searle,et al.  Population Marginal Means in the Linear Model: An Alternative to Least Squares Means , 1980 .

[23]  D.,et al.  Regression Models and Life-Tables , 2022 .