Trains of thought: narrative foreshadowing and predictive processing in Anna Karenina

ABSTRACT This article shows how the cognitive theory known as “predictive processing” can expand our understanding of the ways in which readers are primed by textual cues in Lev Tolstoi’s Anna Karenina to predict story developments, and how this process is linked to narrative momentum and affective engagement. In turn, this study expands the applicability of predictive processing, which relies on the idea that the human brain routinely predicts and updates information in unfolding scenarios, to literary contexts, in productive combination with narrative theories of foreshadowing and schema usage. The authors examine how these systems of cues motivate and shape involvement in the fictional scenarios of Anna Karenina and how they contribute to the text’s foreboding narrative draw – most notably with regard to the redolent motif of suicide by train.

[1]  K. Holland Russia’s capitalist realism: Tolstoy, Dostoevsky, and Chekhov , 2021, Canadian Slavonic Papers.

[2]  B. Cooke Tolstoy’s Family Prototypes in "War and Peace" , 2020 .

[3]  Piotr Litwin,et al.  Unification by Fiat: Arrested Development of Predictive Processing , 2020, Cogn. Sci..

[4]  C. Dickens No. 1 Branch Line: The Signal-Man , 2018, Horror Stories.

[5]  A. Clark A nice surprise? Predictive processing and the active pursuit of novelty , 2018 .

[6]  Daniel Williams,et al.  Predictive Processing and the Representation Wars , 2017, Minds and Machines.

[7]  Daniel Williams Predictive Processing and the Representation Wars , 2017, Minds and Machines.

[8]  M. Nour Surfing Uncertainty: Prediction, Action, and the Embodied Mind. , 2017, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[9]  Liza B. Knapp Anna Karenina and Others: Tolstoy’s Labyrinth of Plots , 2016 .

[10]  David Eichelberger,et al.  Narrative And Freedom The Shadows Of Time , 2016 .

[11]  G. S. Morson The Moral Urgency of Anna Karenina , 2015 .

[12]  A. Clark Predicting Peace: The End of the Representation Wars , 2015 .

[13]  T. Metzinger,et al.  What Does it Mean to Have an Open MIND , 2015 .

[14]  A. Clark Embodied Prediction , 2015 .

[15]  Karin Kukkonen Presence and Prediction: The Embodied Reader's Cascades of Cognition , 2014 .

[16]  R. L. Jackson Defining Moments in Anna Karenina , 2014 .

[17]  Karin Kukkonen Bayesian Narrative: Probability, Plot and the Shape of the Fictional World , 2014 .

[18]  E. Auyoung Partial cues and narrative: Understanding in Anna Karenina , 2013 .

[19]  J. Hohwy The Predictive Mind , 2013 .

[20]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[21]  Andy Clark,et al.  The many faces of precision (Replies to commentaries on “Whatever next? Neural prediction, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science”) , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[22]  A. Clark Personal narratives as the highest level of cognitive integration , 2012 .

[23]  E. Horowitz Narrative Accidents and Literary Miracles , 2011 .

[24]  S. Zeki The Mind’s Eye , 2011, Cerebrum : the Dana forum on brain science.

[25]  M. Wood Doctor Zhivago by Boris Pasternak,: translated by Richard Pevear and Larissa Volokhonsky , 2011 .

[26]  Gary L. Browning A "Labyrinth of Linkages" in Tolstoy's "Anna Karenina" , 2010 .

[27]  Keith Oatley,et al.  The Function of Fiction is the Abstraction and Simulation of Social Experience , 2008, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[28]  A. Tapp Moving Stories: (E)motion and Narrative in Anna Karenina 1 1 OTES I am grateful to Irina Paperno and , 2007 .

[29]  G. S. Morson "Anna Karenina" in Our Time: Seeing More Wisely , 2007 .

[30]  C. Suárez-Orozco,et al.  MOVING STORIES , 2007, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race.

[31]  Tarak Barkawi THE REALIST TRADITION , 2006, The Review of Politics.

[32]  Vladimir Alexandrov Limits to Interpretation: The Meanings of Anna Karenina , 2004 .

[33]  E. Cruise Women, sexuality, and the family in Tolstoy , 2002 .

[34]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  In the Mind's Eye Transportation-Imagery Model of Narrative Persuasion , 2002 .

[35]  J. Matus Trauma, Memory, and Railway Disaster: The Dickensian Connection , 2001, Victorian studies.

[36]  D. Tronrud,et al.  The Limits of Interpretation , 2001 .

[37]  L. Tolstoy,et al.  Anna Karenina , 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[38]  Gary Saul Morson,et al.  Sideshadowing and Tempics. , 1998 .

[39]  J. Mårtenson [Death in literature]. , 1998, Lakartidningen.

[40]  Barbara Lönnqvist A text within a text: The dream in Anna Karenina , 1998 .

[41]  Richard J. Gerrig,et al.  What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts , 1997 .

[42]  B. Prus The Doll , 1996, Stranger in Our Midst.

[43]  D. Rancour-Laferriere The Slave Soul of Russia: Moral Masochism and the Cult of Suffering , 1996 .

[44]  C. Radford Fiction, pity, fear, and jealousy , 1995 .

[45]  A. Mandelker Framing Anna Karenina: Tolstoy, the Woman Question, and the Victorian Novel , 1993 .

[46]  Gary R. Jahn The Unity of Anna Karenina , 1982 .

[47]  J. Frow The literary frame , 1982 .

[48]  Gary R. Jahn The Image of the Railroad in Anna Karenina , 1981 .

[49]  Tzvetan Todorov,et al.  The poetics of prose , 1977 .

[50]  Elisabeth Stenbock-Fermor,et al.  The Architecture of Anna Karenina : A history of its writing, structure and message , 1975 .

[51]  M. Weston,et al.  How Can We Be Moved by the Fate of Anna Karenina , 1975 .

[52]  R. Barthes,et al.  The pleasure of the text , 1973, Positive emotions in early modern literature and culture.

[53]  B. Bellis Whatever Next , 1972, The Mathematical Gazette.

[54]  Julianna Mitchell Truth and Fiction , 1972 .

[55]  M. Stevens A Source for Frou-Frou in Anna Karenina , 1972 .

[56]  B. Hardy The Appropriate Form; An Essay on the Novel , 1964 .

[57]  G. Hall,et al.  The Interpretation of Dreams , 1914, Nature.

[58]  Jim Williams,et al.  What Does It Mean? , 1907, California state journal of medicine.