Development of an algorithm to automatically compress a CT image to visually lossless threshold

BackgroundTo develop an algorithm to predict the visually lossless thresholds (VLTs) of CT images solely using the original images by exploiting the image features and DICOM header information for JPEG2000 compression and to evaluate the algorithm in comparison with pre-existing image fidelity metrics.MethodsFive radiologists independently determined the VLT for 206 body CT images for JPEG2000 compression using QUEST procedure. The images were divided into training (n = 103) and testing (n = 103) sets. Using the training set, a multiple linear regression (MLR) model was constructed regarding the image features and DICOM header information as independent variables and regarding the VLTs determined with median value of the radiologists’ responses (VLTrad) as dependent variable, after determining an optimal subset of independent variables by backward stepwise selection in a cross-validation scheme.The performance was evaluated on the testing set by measuring absolute differences and intra-class correlation (ICC) coefficient between the VLTrad and the VLTs predicted by the model (VLTmodel). The performance of the model was also compared two metrics, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) and high-dynamic range visual difference predictor (HDRVDP). The time for computing VLTs between MLR model, PSNR, and HDRVDP were compared using the repeated ANOVA with a post-hoc analysis. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.ResultsThe means of absolute differences with the VLTrad were 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48, 0.67), 0.73 (0.61, 0.85), and 0.68 (0.58, 0.79), for the MLR model, PSNR, and HDRVDP, respectively, showing significant difference between them (p < 0.01). The ICC coefficients of MLR model, PSNR, and HDRVDP were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81, 0.95), 0.85 (0.79, 0.91), and 0.84 (0.77, 0.91). The computing times for calculating VLT per image were 1.5 ± 0.1 s, 3.9 ± 0.3 s, and 68.2 ± 1.4 s, for MLR metric, PSNR, and HDRVDP, respectively.ConclusionsThe proposed MLR model directly predicting the VLT of a given CT image showed competitive performance to those of image fidelity metrics with less computational expenses. The model would be promising to be used for adaptive compression of CT images.

[1]  Michel Barlaud,et al.  Image coding using wavelet transform , 1992, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[2]  D. Burr,et al.  Selective suppression of the magnocellular visual pathway during saccadic eye movements , 1994, Nature.

[3]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[4]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  What is wrong with compression ratio in lossy image compression? , 2007, Radiology.

[5]  David Melcher,et al.  Spatiotopic temporal integration of visual motion across saccadic eye movements , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  R. Quick A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection , 2004, Kybernetik.

[7]  N. Macmillan Threshold estimation: The state of the art , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Effect of CT image compression on computer-assisted lung nodule volume measurement. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  竹本 宜弘 JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) , 1995 .

[10]  J Szumowski,et al.  Detection of discrete white matter lesions after irreversible compression of MR images. , 1995, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Artifacts in slab average-intensity-projection images reformatted from JPEG 2000 compressed thin-section abdominal CT data sets. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[12]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[13]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000-compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[14]  Rafal Mantiuk,et al.  Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG2000 compressed abdomen CT images using a perceptual image quality metric. , 2008, Academic radiology.

[15]  Thomas Richter,et al.  JPEG2000 3D compression vs. 2D compression: an assessment of artifact amount and computing time in compressing thin-section abdomen CT images. , 2009, Medical physics.

[16]  April Khademi,et al.  Pan-Canadian Evaluation of Irreversible Compression Ratios (“Lossy” Compression) for Development of National Guidelines , 2008, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[17]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Visible differences predictor: an algorithm for the assessment of image fidelity , 1992, Electronic Imaging.

[18]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[19]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  The visual filter mediating letter identification , 1994, Nature.

[20]  Edward Muka,et al.  Irreversible JPEG compression of digital chest radiographs for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. , 2003, Radiology.

[21]  P R Mueller,et al.  CT colonography with teleradiology: effect of lossy wavelet compression on polyp detection--initial observations. , 2001, Radiology.

[22]  Wenjun Zeng,et al.  An overview of the visual optimization tools in JPEG 2000 , 2002, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[23]  Bostjan Likar,et al.  The impact of image information on compressibility and degradation in medical image compression. , 2006, Medical physics.

[24]  Heung-Sik Kang,et al.  Regional difference in compression artifacts in low-dose chest CT images: effects of mathematical and perceptual factors. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  Hong Ren Wu,et al.  Perceptual Color Image Coding With JPEG2000 , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  G S Gazelle,et al.  Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. , 1997, Radiology.

[27]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Differences in compression artifacts on thin- and thick-section lung CT images. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[28]  Thomas Richter,et al.  A Comparison of Three Image Fidelity Metrics of Different Computational Principles for JPEG2000 Compressed Abdomen CT Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Michael F McNitt-Gray,et al.  AAPM/RSNA Physics Tutorial for Residents: Topics in CT. Radiation dose in CT. , 2002, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[30]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images. , 2007, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[31]  Rafał K. Mantiuk,et al.  Use of image features in predicting visually lossless thresholds of JPEG2000 compressed body CT images: initial trial. , 2013, Radiology.

[32]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2003, Technometrics.

[33]  P F van der Stelt,et al.  Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging. , 2000, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[34]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Regional variance of visually lossless threshold in compressed chest CT images: lung versus mediastinum and chest wall. , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[35]  Mathias Prokop,et al.  JPEG2000 compression of thin-section CT images of the lung: effect of compression ratio on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[36]  Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop,et al.  Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality. , 2007, Radiology.

[37]  David Koff,et al.  Implementing a large-scale multicentric study for evaluation of lossy JPEG and JPEG2000 medical image compression: challenges and rewards , 2007, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[38]  Hans-Peter Seidel,et al.  Predicting visible differences in high dynamic range images: model and its calibration , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[39]  Bo Hyoung Kim,et al.  Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold , 2006, European Radiology.

[40]  Yeong-Gil Shin,et al.  Advantage in image fidelity and additional computing time of JPEG2000 3D in comparison to JPEG2000 in compressing abdomen CT image datasets of different section thicknesses. , 2010, Medical physics.

[41]  Yeong-Gil Shin,et al.  Comparison of three image comparison methods for the visual assessment of the image fidelity of compressed computed tomography images. , 2011, Medical physics.

[42]  Yi Wang,et al.  3-T navigator parallel-imaging coronary MR angiography: targeted-volume versus whole-heart acquisition. , 2008, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[43]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[44]  R A Olshen,et al.  Thoracic CT images: effect of lossy image compression on diagnostic accuracy. , 1994, Radiology.

[45]  Quick Rf A vector-magnitude model of contrast detection. , 1974 .

[46]  Zhen Liu,et al.  JPEG2000 encoding with perceptual distortion control , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[47]  John Robson,et al.  Vision research : a practical guide to laboratory methods , 1998 .

[48]  Henry Rusinek,et al.  Wavelet compression of low-dose chest CT data: effect on lung nodule detection. , 2003, Radiology.

[49]  Heung-Sik Kang,et al.  Objective index of image fidelity for JPEG2000 compressed body CT images. , 2009, Medical physics.

[50]  Yoshimitsu Ohgiya,et al.  Acute cerebral infarction: effect of JPEG compression on detection at CT. , 2003, Radiology.

[51]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning , 2001 .

[52]  A. Watson,et al.  The method of constant stimuli is inefficient , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  Kil Joong Kim,et al.  JPEG2000 compression of CT images used for measuring coronary artery calcification score: assessment of optimal compression threshold. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[54]  Oleg S. Pianykh,et al.  Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) , 2017, Radiopaedia.org.

[55]  Helen Hong,et al.  Managing the CT Data Explosion: Initial Experiences of Archiving Volumetric Datasets in a Mini-PACS , 2005, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[56]  Hosik Choi,et al.  Predicting the fidelity of JPEG2000 compressed CT images using DICOM header information. , 2011, Medical physics.

[57]  A. Manduca,et al.  Wavelet compression of medical images. , 1998, Radiology.

[58]  G. Rubin,et al.  Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[59]  Bohyoung Kim,et al.  Definition of compression ratio: difference between two commercial JPEG2000 program libraries. , 2008, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.