A case for variational geomagnetic data assimilation: insights from a one-dimensional, nonlinear, and sparsely observed MHD system

Secular variations of the geomagnetic field have been measured with a continuously improving accuracy during the last few hundred years, culminating nowadays with satellite data. It is however well known that the dynamics of the magnetic field is linked to that of the velocity field in the core and any attempt to model secular variations will involve a coupled dynamical system for magnetic field and core velocity. Unfortunately, there is no direct observation of the velocity. Independently of the exact nature of the above-mentioned coupled system – some version being currently under construction – the question is debated in this paper whether good knowledge of the magnetic field can be translated into good knowledge of core dynamics. Furthermore, what will be the impact of the most recent and precise geomagnetic data on our knowledge of the geomagnetic field of the past and future? These questions are cast into the language of variational data assimilation, while the dynamical system considered in this paper consists in a set of two oversimplified one-dimensional equations for magnetic and velocity fields. This toy model retains important features inherited from the induction and Navier-Stokes equations: non-linear magnetic and momentum terms are present and its linear response to small disturbances contains Alfven waves. It is concluded that variational data assimilation is indeed appropriate in principle, even though the velocity field remains hidden at all times; it allows us to recover the entire evolution of both fields from partial and irregularly distributed information on the magnetic field. This work constitutes a first step on the way toward the reassimilation of historical geomagnetic data and geomagnetic forecast.

[1]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  Ørsted Initial Field Model , 2000 .

[2]  Gauthier Hulot,et al.  On core surface flows inferred from satellite magnetic data , 2005 .

[3]  F. Nogueira,et al.  Nonuniqueness of inverted core‐mantle boundary flows and deviations from tangential geostrophy , 2004 .

[4]  W. Kuang,et al.  Data assimilation in a sparsely observed one-dimensional modeled MHD system , 2007 .

[5]  D. Menemenlis.  Inverse Modeling of the Ocean and Atmosphere , 2002 .

[6]  J. Le Mouël.  Outer-core geostrophic flow and secular variation of Earth's geomagnetic field , 1984 .

[7]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Fluid flow near the surface of Earth's outer core , 1991 .

[8]  S. Maus,et al.  The Swarm End-to-End mission simulator study: A demonstration of separating the various contributions to Earth’s magnetic field using synthetic data , 2006 .

[9]  Don Liu,et al.  Observing system simulation experiments in geomagnetic data assimilation , 2006 .

[10]  Raymond Hide,et al.  Free hydromagnetic oscillations of the earth's core and the theory of the geomagnetic secular variation , 1966, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[11]  P. Courtier,et al.  Variational Assimilation of Meteorological Observations With the Adjoint Vorticity Equation. I: Theory , 2007 .

[12]  J. Bloxham.  Simple models of fluid flow at the core surface derived from geomagnetic field models , 1989 .

[13]  Jeremy Bloxham,et al.  Geomagnetic secular variation , 1989, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[14]  W. D. Parkinson.  Introduction to geomagnetism , 1983 .

[15]  R. Merrill.  The magnetic field of the earth , 1996 .

[16]  J. Shewchuk.  An Introduction to the Conjugate Gradient Method Without the Agonizing Pain , 1994 .

[17]  D. Jault,et al.  Westward drift, core motions and exchanges of angular momentum between core and mantle , 1988, Nature.

[18]  P. Olson,et al.  Helical core flow from geomagnetic secular variation , 2004 .

[19]  Edward Crisp Bullard,et al.  Kinematics of geomagnetic secular variation in a perfectly conducting core , 1968, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[20]  Mioara Mandea,et al.  CHAOS—a model of the Earth's magnetic field derived from CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC‐C magnetic satellite data , 2006 .

[21]  Harvey P. Greenspan,et al.  The Theory of Rotating Fluids. By H. P. GREENSPAN. Cambridge University Press, 1968. 327 pp. £5.50. , 1972, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[22]  Paul H. Roberts,et al.  On Analysis of the Secular Variation , 1965 .

[23]  Olivier Talagrand,et al.  Assimilation of Observations, an Introduction (gtSpecial IssueltData Assimilation in Meteology and Oceanography: Theory and Practice) , 1997 .

[24]  Andrew Jackson,et al.  Equatorially Dominated Magnetic Field Change at the Surface of Earth's Core , 2003, Science.

[25]  S. Maus,et al.  Introducing POMME, the POtsdam Magnetic Model of the Earth , 2005 .

[26]  Pierre Brasseur,et al.  Ocean Data Assimilation Using Sequential Methods Based on the Kalman Filter , 2006 .

[27]  P. Courtier,et al.  Variational Assimilation of Meteorological Observations With the Adjoint Vorticity Equation. Ii: Numerical Results , 2007 .

[28]  Philippe Courtier,et al.  Unified Notation for Data Assimilation : Operational, Sequential and Variational , 1997 .

[29]  P. Fischer,et al.  High-Order Methods for Incompressible Fluid Flow , 2002 .

[30]  J. Bloxham.  Dynamics of Angular Momentum in the Earth's Core , 1998 .

[31]  Matthew R. Walker,et al.  Four centuries of geomagnetic secular variation from historical records , 2000, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[32]  Jean-Paul Poirier,et al.  Transport properties of liquid metals and viscosity of the Earth's core , 1988 .