The Use of Different Information Channels in an Organizational Context

Because information is vital to effective decision making, the fostering of conditions which promote effective use of existing channels of information is therefore seen as a prime element contributing to organizational survival and success (Fulmer et al, 1990). In particular, the way in which characteristics of individuals and the attributes of the tasks they perform, affect the use of different information sources is a pertinent issue in organizational analysis. It is also an important consideration in information systems development and management. Much of the existing research in this area has been dominated by attempts to define appropriate modes of information processing and the construction of models that might enhance effective communication (O'Reilly, 1982; Schick et al, 1990; Kim 8c Lee, 1991). The importance of this area of research has been heightened by the dynamics and complexities of industrial organizations and the need for various modes of information processing to address these dynamics (Kim & Lee, 1991). Also, because the appropriate use of information is the ‘life‐blood’ of organizational dynamics, the identification of aspects that might affect differential use of various channels (of information) is fundamental to an understanding of the area.

[1]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[2]  Harvey Krahn,et al.  Computer Skills and Use among High School and University Graduates , 1989 .

[3]  Ravinder Nath Are frequent computer users more satisfied? , 1989, Inf. Process. Manag..

[4]  M. Kiggundu,et al.  Task Interdependence and the Theory of Job Design , 1981 .

[5]  Urs E. Gattiker,et al.  Computerized offices in Canada and the United States: Investigating dispositional similarities and differences , 1988 .

[6]  Lokman Mia,et al.  SPAN OF CONTROL, TASK INTERDEPENDENCE AND USEFULNESS OF MAS INFORMATION IN NOT‐FOR‐PROFIT GOVERNMENT ORGANIZATIONS , 1991 .

[7]  L. G. Hrebiniak Job Technology, Supervision, and Work-Group Structure. , 1974 .

[8]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  A study of personal computer utilization by managers , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[9]  Donald T. Hawkins Information delivery—paper and e-mail , 1989 .

[10]  Gerardo R. Ungson,et al.  Managerial Information Processing: A Research Review. , 1981 .

[11]  James D. McKeen,et al.  Enhancing Computer-Mediated Communication: An experimental investigation into the use of a Group Decision Support System for face-to-face versus remote meetings , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[12]  W. C. Guenther,et al.  Analysis of variance , 1968, The Mathematical Gazette.

[13]  Iris Vessey,et al.  Cognitive Fit: A Theory‐Based Analysis of the Graphs Versus Tables Literature* , 1991 .

[14]  Lawrence A. Gordon,et al.  Information overload: A temporal approach☆ , 1990 .

[15]  Harold A. Kurstedt,et al.  The effects of information availability on the group consensus process , 1990 .

[16]  Penelope A. Yates-Mercer,et al.  Some impacts of electronic mail on information services , 1990, J. Inf. Sci..

[17]  A Langley,et al.  In search of rationality: the purposes behind the use of formal analysis in organizations. , 1989, Administrative science quarterly.

[18]  L. F. Young Decision support systems for workers: A bridge to advancing productivity , 1989, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Nilitas Assimakopolous,et al.  The influence of new technology in organization and management , 1988 .

[20]  David K. Goldstein,et al.  The Impact of Marketing Information Supply on Product Managers: an Organizational Information Processing Perspective , 1988, ICIS.

[21]  Bruce Cheek,et al.  Profiles and correlates of computer usage: a study of the Australian telecommunications industry , 1993 .

[22]  John T. Mentzer,et al.  Microcomputer versus mainframe usage by marketing professionals , 1987 .

[23]  J. Hackman,et al.  Relationships between organization structure and employee reactions: Comparing alternative frameworks , 1981 .