Two-scale Study of Concrete Fracturing Behavior

The cohesive crack model is, nowadays, widely used for the analysis of propagating cracks in concrete and other quasi-brittle materials. So far the softening curve, which gives the stress transmitted between two adjacent crack surfaces as a function of the crack opening, has been considered a material property and the parameters defining that curve, the tensile strength ft′, the initial fracture energy Gf (area under the initial tangent of the softening curve) and the total fracture energy GF (total area under the softening curve), have been identified by testing relatively small laboratory specimens. In this study typical experimental procedures used for the characterization of the fracture behavior of concrete, namely single notched specimens subjected to tensile loading, three-point bending tests, bending of unnotched specimens, and splitting (Brazilian) tests are analyzed on the basis of the Confinement-Shear Lattice (CSL) model, recently developed by the authors. A two-scale procedure is outlined in order to infer an equivalent macroscopic cohesive crack law from the meso-level response. The analysis of the lattice model response is analyzed in order to define the actual macroscopic material properties of concrete fracture. The results show that the tensile strength and the initial fracture energy are material properties and that they can be identified from the analysis of laboratory specimens. On the contrary, the total fracture energy identified from usual experiments is size-dependent and boundary-condition-dependent.

[1]  M. Elices,et al.  Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 2—Influence of bulk energy dissipation , 1992 .

[2]  J. E. Bolander,et al.  Cohesive zone modeling of fracture in irregular lattices , 2003 .

[3]  John E. Bolander,et al.  Structural Concrete Analysis Using Rigid‐Body‐Spring Networks , 2000 .

[4]  M. Tabbara,et al.  RANDOM PARTICLE MODEL FOR FRACTURE OF AGGREGATE OR FIBER COMPOSITES , 1990 .

[5]  M. Elices,et al.  Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 3—influence of cutting theP-δ tail , 1992 .

[6]  Zdeněk P. Bažant,et al.  Confinement-shear lattice CSL model for fracture propagation in concrete , 2006 .

[7]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Fracture and Size Effect in Concrete and Other Quasibrittle Materials , 1997 .

[8]  Jaime Planas,et al.  Size effect and boundary conditions in the Brazilian test: Experimental verification , 1999 .

[9]  P. E. Roelfstra,et al.  Le béton numérique , 1985 .

[10]  Erik Schlangen,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of micromechanisms of fracture of cement-based composites , 1992 .

[11]  A. Hillerborg,et al.  Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements , 1976 .

[12]  David P. Dobkin,et al.  The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls , 1996, TOMS.

[13]  I. Carol,et al.  Micromechanical analysis of quasi‐brittle materials using fracture‐based interface elements , 2001 .

[14]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Boundary effect on concrete fracture and non-constant fracture energy distribution , 2003 .

[15]  J. Mier,et al.  3D lattice type fracture model for concrete , 2003 .

[16]  Zdeněk P. Bažant,et al.  Choice of standard fracture test for concrete and its statistical evaluation , 2002 .

[17]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Thickness Effect on Fracture Energy of Cementitious Materials , 2003 .

[18]  Z. Bažant,et al.  Crack band theory for fracture of concrete , 1983 .

[19]  Gianluca Cusatis,et al.  Confinement-Shear Lattice Model for Concrete Damage in Tension and Compression: I. Theory , 2002 .

[20]  V. Slowik,et al.  Computer simulation of fracture processes of concrete using mesolevel models of lattice structures , 2004 .

[21]  P. Petersson.  Crack growth and development of fracture zones in plain concrete and similar materials , 1981 .

[22]  Milan Jirásek,et al.  Nonlocal integral formulations of plasticity and damage : Survey of progress , 2002 .

[23]  M. Elices,et al.  Measurement of the fracture energy using three-point bend tests: Part 1—Influence of experimental procedures , 1992 .

[24]  John E. Bolander,et al.  Simulation of fracture in cement-based composites , 1995 .

[25]  Sandro Dei Poli,et al.  TENSILE BEHAVIOR OF CONCRETE , 1987 .

[26]  J. Bolander,et al.  Fracture analyses using spring networks with random geometry , 1998 .

[27]  Z. Bažant.  FRACTURE MECHANICS OF CONCRETE STRUCTURES , 1992 .

[28]  H. K. Hilsdorf,et al.  Influence of ligament length and stress state on fracture energy of concrete , 1990 .

[29]  Gianluca Cusatis,et al.  CONFINEMENT-SHEAR LATTICE MODEL FOR CONCRETE DAMAGE IN TENSION AND COMPRESSION: II. COMPUTATION AND VALIDATION , 2003 .

[30]  Zdeněk P. Bažant,et al.  Statistical prediction of fracture parameters of concrete and implications for choice of testing standard , 2002 .

[31]  Zdenek P. Bazant,et al.  Interface element modeling of fracture in aggregate composites , 1987 .

[32]  Milan Jirásek,et al.  ADAPTIVE RESOLUTION OF LOCALIZED DAMAGE IN QUASI-BRITTLE MATERIALS , 2004 .

[33]  Ignacio Carol,et al.  3D meso-structural analysis of concrete specimens under uniaxial tension , 2006 .

[34]  Xiaozhi Hu,et al.  Fracture energy and fracture process zone , 1992 .

[35]  Milan Jirásek,et al.  Size effect on fracture energy induced by non‐locality , 2004 .