Inferring Signaling Pathway Topologies from Multiple Perturbation Measurements of Specific Biochemical Species

The specification of biological decisions by signaling pathways is encoded by the interplay between activation dynamics and network topologies. Although we can describe complex networks, we cannot easily determine which topology the cell actually uses to transduce a specific signal. Experimental testing of all plausible topologies is infeasible because of the combinatorially large number of experiments required to explore the complete hypothesis space. Here, we demonstrate that Bayesian inference-based modeling provides an approach to explore and constrain this hypothesis space,permitting the rational ranking of pathway models. Our approach can use measurements of a limited number of biochemical species when combined with multiple perturbations. As proof of concept, we examined the activation of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway by epidermal growth factor. The predicted and experimentally validated model shows that both Raf-1 and, unexpectedly,B-Raf are needed to fully activate ERK in two different cell lines. Thus, our formal methodology rationally infers evidentially supported pathway topologies even when a limited number of biochemical and kinetic measurements are available.

[1]  A. Hodgkin,et al.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve , 1952, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  Athanasios Papoulis,et al.  Probability, Random Variables and Stochastic Processes , 1965 .

[3]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Probability, random variables and stochastic processes , 1985, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[4]  S. Cook,et al.  RapV12 antagonizes Ras‐dependent activation of ERK1 and ERK2 by LPA and EGF in Rat‐1 fibroblasts. , 1993, The EMBO journal.

[5]  P. Cohen,et al.  EGF triggers neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells that overexpress the EGF receptor , 1994, Current Biology.

[6]  H. Yao,et al.  cAMP Activates MAP Kinase and Elk-1 through a B-Raf- and Rap1-Dependent Pathway , 1997, Cell.

[7]  C. Marshall,et al.  Differential Regulation of Raf-1, A-Raf, and B-Raf by Oncogenic Ras and Tyrosine Kinases* , 1997, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  G. Müller,et al.  Regulation of Raf‐1 kinase by TNF via its second messenger ceramide and cross‐talk with mitogenic signalling , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[9]  Barbara Franke,et al.  Extracellular signal‐regulated activation of Rap1 fails to interfere in Ras effector signalling , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[10]  W. Kolch,et al.  Cell-type specific integration of cross-talk between extracellular signal-regulated kinase and cAMP signaling. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.

[11]  Simon C Watkins,et al.  The Recruitment of Raf-1 to Membranes Is Mediated by Direct Interaction with Phosphatidic Acid and Is Independent of Association with Ras* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  V. Ferrans,et al.  Membrane Localization of Cyclic Nucleotide Phosphodiesterase 3 (PDE3) , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  Walter Kolch,et al.  Identification of the Mechanisms Regulating the Differential Activation of the MAPK Cascade by Epidermal Growth Factor and Nerve Growth Factor in PC12 Cells* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  P. Stork,et al.  Crosstalk between cAMP and MAP kinase signaling in the regulation of cell proliferation. , 2002, Trends in cell biology.

[15]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Untangling the wires: A strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  E. Gilles,et al.  Computational modeling of the dynamics of the MAP kinase cascade activated by surface and internalized EGF receptors , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  J. Nickel,et al.  Associations of B- and C-Raf with Cholesterol, Phosphatidylserine, and Lipid Second Messengers , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  S. Døskeland,et al.  A novel Epac-specific cAMP analogue demonstrates independent regulation of Rap1 and ERK , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[19]  J. Beavo,et al.  Cyclic nucleotide research — still expanding after half a century , 2002, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[20]  Richard Marais,et al.  The RAF proteins take centre stage , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[21]  K. H. Lee,et al.  The statistical mechanics of complex signaling networks: nerve growth factor signaling , 2004, Physical biology.

[22]  Martin J. Lohse,et al.  Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer–Based Analysis of cAMP Dynamics in Live Neonatal Rat Cardiac Myocytes Reveals Distinct Functions of Compartmentalized Phosphodiesterases , 2004, Circulation research.

[23]  G. Baillie,et al.  Arrestin times for compartmentalised cAMP signalling and phosphodiesterase-4 enzymes. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[24]  D. Barford,et al.  Wild-type and mutant B-RAF activate C-RAF through distinct mechanisms involving heterodimerization. , 2005, Molecular cell.

[25]  H. Kitano,et al.  A comprehensive pathway map of epidermal growth factor receptor signaling , 2005, Molecular systems biology.

[26]  W. Kolch,et al.  Regulation and Role of Raf-1/B-Raf Heterodimerization , 2006, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[27]  A. Kolbus,et al.  ERK and Beyond: Insights from B-Raf and Raf-1 Conditional Knockouts , 2006, Cell cycle.

[28]  Rony Seger,et al.  The MEK/ERK cascade: from signaling specificity to diverse functions. , 2007, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[29]  D. Morrison,et al.  Integrating signals from RTKs to ERK/MAPK , 2007, Oncogene.

[30]  Walter Kolch,et al.  Phosphatase and Feedback Regulation of Raf-1 Signaling , 2007, Cell cycle.

[31]  P. Bastiaens,et al.  Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[32]  O. Rath,et al.  MAP kinase signalling pathways in cancer , 2007, Oncogene.

[33]  Mark A. Girolami,et al.  Bayesian ranking of biochemical system models , 2008, Bioinform..

[34]  Neil D. Lawrence,et al.  Accelerating Bayesian Inference over Nonlinear Differential Equations with Gaussian Processes , 2008, NIPS.

[35]  D. Wilkinson Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[36]  Christina Kiel,et al.  Cell Type–Specific Importance of Ras–c-Raf Complex Association Rate Constants for MAPK Signaling , 2009, Science Signaling.

[37]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[38]  M. Girolami,et al.  Inferring Signaling Pathway Topologies from Multiple Perturbation Measurements of Specific Biochemical Species , 2010, Science Signaling.