Habitats in DCE-MRI to Predict Clinically Significant Prostate Cancers

Prostate cancer identification and assessment of clinical significance continues to be a challenge. Routine multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging has shown to be useful in assessing disease progression. Although dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging (DCE) has the ability to characterize perfusion across time and has shown enormous utility, radiological assessment (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System or PIRADS version 2) has limited its use owing to lack of consistency and nonquantitative nature. In our work, we propose a systematic methodology to quantify perfusion dynamics for the DCE imaging. Using these metrics, 7 different subregions or perfusion habitats of the targeted lesions are localized and related to clinical significance. We found that quantitative features describing the habitat based on the late area under the DCE time-activity curve was a good predictor of clinical significance disease. The best predictive feature in the habitat had an AUC of 0.82, CI [0.81–0.83].

[1]  Nithin N. Vajuvalli,et al.  The Tofts model in frequency domain: fast and robust determination of pharmacokinetic maps for dynamic contrast enhancement MRI , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2016 , 2016, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[3]  A. Haase,et al.  Snapshot flash mri. applications to t1, t2, and chemical‐shift imaging , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Computer-Aided Detection of Prostate Cancer in MRI , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  P. Tofts,et al.  Measurement of the blood‐brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Juan J. Martinez,et al.  Spatial Habitat Features Derived from Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data Are Associated with Molecular Subtype and 12-Month Survival Status in Glioblastoma Multiforme , 2015, PloS one.

[7]  K. Macura,et al.  Performance of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation and management of clinically low-risk prostate cancer. , 2014, Urologic oncology.

[8]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Discriminating Low-Grade From High-Grade Prostate Cancer , 2015, Investigative radiology.

[9]  H. Huisman,et al.  Accurate estimation of pharmacokinetic contrast‐enhanced dynamic MRI parameters of the prostate , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[10]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[11]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[12]  Ron Kikinis,et al.  Variations of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of breast cancer therapy response: a multicenter data analysis challenge. , 2014, Translational oncology.

[13]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Assessment of prostate cancer aggressiveness using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T. , 2013, European urology.

[14]  Lixia Miao,et al.  PSA and Prostate Health Index based prostate cancer screening in a hereditary migration complicated population: implications in precision diagnosis , 2017, Journal of Cancer.

[15]  Therese Miller,et al.  Benefits and Harms of Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening for Prostate Cancer: An Evidence Update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2008, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[16]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[17]  Radka Stoyanova,et al.  Automatic Detection and Quantitative DCE-MRI Scoring of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness , 2017, Front. Oncol..

[18]  Yue Cao,et al.  DCE-MRI defined subvolumes of a brain metastatic lesion by principle component analysis and fuzzy-c-means clustering for response assessment of radiation therapy. , 2013, Medical physics.

[19]  A. Madabhushi,et al.  Radiomic features for prostate cancer detection on MRI differ between the transition and peripheral zones: Preliminary findings from a multi‐institutional study , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  R. Stoyanova,et al.  An Automated Multiparametric MRI Quantitative Imaging Prostate Habitat Risk Scoring System for Defining External Beam Radiation Therapy Boost Volumes. , 2017, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Ruijiang Li,et al.  Intratumoral Spatial Heterogeneity at Perfusion MR Imaging Predicts Recurrence-free Survival in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. , 2018, Radiology.

[22]  F. Frauscher,et al.  Applications of transrectal ultrasound in prostate cancer. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[23]  W. I. Tseng,et al.  Washout gradient in dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI is associated with tumor aggressiveness of prostate cancer , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.