Soybean response to water : A QTL analysis of drought tolerance

Soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield, when regressed on water needed to replenish 0 to 100% seasonal evapotranspiration (ET), generates an estimate of season-specific water-use efficiency (WUE). The impact of unpredictable water deficits might be lessened if high-yielding genotypes had a smaller beta. Our objective was to determine the genetic basis of beta and carbon isotope discrimination (CID), a theorized indicator of transpiration efficiency (TE). A Minsoy' Noir I' population of 236 recombinant inbred lines (RILs), genotyped at 665 loci, was evaluated in six water treatements (100, 80, 60, 40, 20, and 0% ET) for 2 yr. Water stress was mild in 1994, but high temperatures and no rainfall in 1995 led to a drought so severe that the 100% ET treatment required 41 cm of irrigation. The 1995 yield-to-water regression was highly linear (28 kg ha -1 cm -1 ), Genotype × water (G × W) interaction was due to genotypic heterogeneity in beta. The CH) vs. beta correlation was low (r = 0.26), so selection for better leaf TE may not improve crop WUE, Selection of low beta (less sensitivity to drought) will be difficult, given the yield beta vs. yield correlation (r = 0.71). The major quantitative trait loci (QTL) for yield beta, yield, and CID were coincident with maturity and/or determinancy QTLs. except for a CID QTL in linkage group U09-C2. but it had no effect on beta. Genetic improvement of soybean yield performance under drought would be better achieved by coupling a high-yield grand mean with a high- (not low-) yield beta.

[1]  J. Ehleringer.  12 – 13C/12C Fractionation and Its Utility in Terrestrial Plant Studies , 1991 .

[2]  J. L. Cartter,et al.  Physiological Factors Affecting Composition of Soybeans: II. Response of Oil and Other Constituents of Soybeans to Temperature Under Controlled Conditions 1 , 1958 .

[3]  Eric S. Lander,et al.  Resolution of quantitative traits into Mendelian factors by using a complete linkage map of restriction fragment length polymorphisms , 1988, Nature.

[4]  J. Passioura,et al.  Grain yield, harvest index, and water use of wheat. , 1977 .

[5]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. , 1990 .

[6]  D. Ashley,et al.  Molecular Markers Associated with Water Use Efficiency and Leaf Ash in Soybean , 1996 .

[7]  K. Chase,et al.  Genetics of Soybean Agronomic Traits: II. Interactions between Yield Quantitative Trait Loci in Soybean , 1999 .

[8]  J. H. Williams,et al.  Soybean Irrigation Serially Timed During Stages Rl to R6. I. Agronomic Responses 1 , 1985 .

[9]  Use of Irrigation in Selection for Soybean Yield Potential under Drought , 1997 .

[10]  J. Boyer.  Plant Productivity and Environment , 1982, Science.

[11]  D. Ashley,et al.  An Additional QTL for Water Use Efficiency in Soybean , 1998 .

[12]  K. Lark,et al.  An Integrated Genetic Linkage Map of the Soybean Genome , 1999 .

[13]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Carbon isotope dynamics in Abies amabilis stands in the Cascades , 1998 .

[14]  W. D. Hanson.  Minimum Family Sizes for the Planning of Genetic Experiments , 1959 .

[15]  I. Goldman,et al.  Differential genotypic response to drought stress and subsoil aluminum in soybean , 1989 .

[16]  Graham D. Farquhar,et al.  On the Relationship Between Carbon Isotope Discrimination and the Intercellular Carbon Dioxide Concentration in Leaves , 1982 .

[17]  J. H. Williams,et al.  Irrigation of Soybean Genotypes During Reproductive Ontogeny. I. Agronomic Responses1 , 1983 .

[18]  C. T. de Wit,et al.  Transpiration and crop yields. , 1958 .

[19]  R. Doerge,et al.  Empirical threshold values for quantitative trait mapping. , 1994, Genetics.

[20]  K. Chase,et al.  Genetics of soybean agronomic traits: I. Comparison of three related recombinant inbred populations , 1999 .

[21]  J. H. Williams,et al.  Differential Responses of Soybean Genotypes Subjected to a Seasonal Soil Water Gradient 1 , 1986 .

[22]  J. Orf,et al.  Agronomic Performance of Soybean Recombinant Inbreds in Northern USA and Chile , 1995 .

[23]  J. Specht,et al.  Soybean yield potential: A genetic and physiological perspective , 1999 .

[24]  E. Lander,et al.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. , 1989, Genetics.

[25]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Stability of soybean harvest index , 1984 .

[26]  R. Shoemaker,et al.  Mapping QTL for Seed Protein and Oil Content in Eight Soybean Populations , 1997 .

[27]  J. Nienhuis,et al.  Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms Associated with Water Use Efficiency in Tomato , 1989, Science.

[28]  J. Ehleringer,et al.  Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis , 1989 .

[29]  Perry B. Cregan,et al.  Genetic Mapping of Agronomic Traits Using Recombinant Inbred Lines of Soybean , 1996 .

[30]  B. L. Blad,et al.  Water Use Efficiency in Soybean Pubescence Density Isolines— A Calculation Procedure for Estimating Daily Values' 1 , 1986 .

[31]  G. Farquhar,et al.  Heritability and Genotype × Environment Interactions of Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Transpiration Efficiency in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) , 1988 .

[32]  A. Rosielle,et al.  Theoretical Aspects of Selection for Yield in Stress and Non-Stress Environment 1 , 1981 .

[33]  W. M. Ross,et al.  Exact Confidence Intervals for Heritability on a Progeny Mean Basis1 , 1983 .

[34]  J. T. Musick,et al.  Water-Yield Relationships for Irrigated and Dryland Wheat in the U.S. Southern Plains , 1994 .

[35]  H. F. Robinson,et al.  Pleiotropism and the Genetic Variance and Covariance , 1959 .