Effect of progenitor cell mobilization with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with peripheral artery disease: a randomized clinical trial.

IMPORTANCE Many patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) have walking impairment despite therapy. Experimental studies in animals demonstrate improved perfusion in ischemic hind limb after mobilization of bone marrow progenitor cells (PCs), but whether this is effective in patients with PAD is unknown. OBJECTIVE To investigate whether therapy with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) improves exercise capacity in patients with intermittent claudication. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In a phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 159 patients (median [SD] age, 64 [8] years; 87% male, 37% with diabetes) with intermittent claudication were enrolled at medical centers affiliated with Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, between January 2010 and July 2012. INTERVENTIONS Participants were randomized (1:1) to received 4 weeks of subcutaneous injections of GM-CSF (leukine), 500 μg/day 3 times a week, or placebo. Both groups were encouraged to walk to claudication daily. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was peak treadmill walking time (PWT) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were PWT at 6 months and changes in circulating PC levels, ankle brachial index (ABI), and walking impairment questionnaire (WIQ) and 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) scores. RESULTS Of the 159 patients randomized, 80 were assigned to the GM-CSF group. The mean (SD) PWT at 3 months increased in the GM-CSF group from 296 (151) seconds to 405 (248) seconds (mean change, 109 seconds [95% CI, 67 to 151]) and in the placebo group from 308 (161) seconds to 376 (182) seconds (change of 56 seconds [95% CI, 14 to 98]), but this difference was not significant (mean difference in change in PWT, 53 seconds [95% CI, -6 to 112], P = .08). At 3 months, compared with placebo, GM-CSF improved the physical functioning subscore of the SF-36 questionnaire by 11.4 (95% CI, 6.7 to 16.1) vs 4.8 (95% CI, -0.1 to 9.6), with a mean difference in change for GM-CSF vs placebo of 7.5 (95% CI, 1.0 to 14.0; P = .03). Similarly, the distance score of the WIQ improved by 12.5 (95% CI, 6.4 to 18.7) vs 4.8 (95% CI, -0.2 to 9.8) with GM-CSF compared with placebo (mean difference in change, 7.9 [95% CI, 0.2 to 15.7], P = .047). There were no significant differences in the ABI, WIQ distance and speed scores, claudication onset time, or mental or physical component scores of the SF-36 between the groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Therapy with GM-CSF 3 times a week did not improve treadmill walking performance at the 3-month follow-up. The improvements in some secondary outcomes with GM-CSF suggest that it may warrant further study in patients with claudication. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01041417.

[1]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  Home-based walking exercise intervention in peripheral artery disease: a randomized clinical trial. , 2013, JAMA.

[2]  C. Reid,et al.  Effect of ramipril on walking times and quality of life among patients with peripheral artery disease and intermittent claudication: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, JAMA.

[3]  A. Quyyumi,et al.  Bone marrow mobilization with granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor improves endothelial dysfunction and exercise capacity in patients with peripheral arterial disease. , 2009, American heart journal.

[4]  H. Dohmann,et al.  Granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor gene based therapy for acute limb ischemia in a mouse model , 2009, The journal of gene medicine.

[5]  L. Norgren,et al.  TASC II section F on revascularization in PAD. , 2007, Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists.

[6]  L. Ferrucci,et al.  Baseline functional performance predicts the rate of mobility loss in persons with peripheral arterial disease. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  Y. Ostchega,et al.  Prevalence of Peripheral Arterial Disease and Risk Factors in Persons Aged 60 and Older: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2004 , 2007, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[8]  J. Tijssen,et al.  START Trial: A Pilot Study on STimulation of ARTeriogenesis Using Subcutaneous Application of Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor as a New Treatment for Peripheral Vascular Disease , 2005, Circulation.

[9]  M. Kelm,et al.  Impaired progenitor cell activity in age-related endothelial dysfunction. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Luigi Ferrucci,et al.  Functional decline in peripheral arterial disease: associations with the ankle brachial index and leg symptoms. , 2004, JAMA.

[11]  B. Meier,et al.  Coronary collateral flow and peripheral blood monocyte concentration in patients treated with granulocyte–macrophage colony stimulating factor , 2004, Heart.

[12]  Hyun-Jai Cho,et al.  Effects of intracoronary infusion of peripheral blood stem-cells mobilised with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor on left ventricular systolic function and restenosis after coronary stenting in myocardial infarction: the MAGIC cell randomised clinical trial , 2004, The Lancet.

[13]  Pascal J. Goldschmidt-Clermont,et al.  Aging, Progenitor Cell Exhaustion, and Atherosclerosis , 2003, Circulation.

[14]  M. Hristov,et al.  Endothelial progenitor cells: mobilization, differentiation, and homing. , 2003, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[15]  K. Shimada,et al.  Therapeutic angiogenesis for patients with limb ischaemia by autologous transplantation of bone-marrow cells: a pilot study and a randomised controlled trial , 2002, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Guralnik,et al.  The Ankle Brachial Index Is Associated with Leg Function and Physical Activity: The Walking and Leg Circulation Study , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  I. Buschmann,et al.  GM-CSF: a strong arteriogenic factor acting by amplification of monocyte function. , 2001, Atherosclerosis.

[18]  F. Eberli,et al.  Promotion of Collateral Growth by Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study , 2001, Circulation.

[19]  L. Sharma,et al.  Leg symptoms in peripheral arterial disease: associated clinical characteristics and functional impairment. , 2001, JAMA.

[20]  K. Akagawa,et al.  IL-10 Inhibits Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor-Dependent Human Monocyte Survival at the Early Stage of the Culture and Inhibits the Generation of Macrophages1 , 2001, The Journal of Immunology.

[21]  M. Entman,et al.  Regeneration of ischemic cardiac muscle and vascular endothelium by adult stem cells. , 2001, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[22]  S. Homma,et al.  Neovascularization of ischemic myocardium by human bone-marrow–derived angioblasts prevents cardiomyocyte apoptosis, reduces remodeling and improves cardiac function , 2001, Nature Medicine.

[23]  H. Gadner,et al.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for collection of peripheral blood progenitor cells from healthy donors , 2000, Current opinion in hematology.

[24]  J. Isner,et al.  Bone marrow origin of endothelial progenitor cells responsible for postnatal vasculogenesis in physiological and pathological neovascularization. , 1999, Circulation research.

[25]  Haruchika Masuda,et al.  Ischemia- and cytokine-induced mobilization of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells for neovascularization , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[26]  O. Haas,et al.  G-CSF versus GM-CSF for stimulation of peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) and leukocytes in healthy volunteers: comparison of efficacy and tolerability , 1999, Annals of Hematology.

[27]  T. Lane,et al.  Mobilization of blood‐derived stem and progenitor cells in normal subjects by granulocyte‐macrophage‐ and granulocyte‐colony‐stimulating factors , 1999, Transfusion.

[28]  S. Rafii,et al.  Evidence for circulating bone marrow-derived endothelial cells. , 1998, Blood.

[29]  R. Warnke,et al.  A novel five-transmembrane hematopoietic stem cell antigen: isolation, characterization, and molecular cloning. , 1997, Blood.

[30]  R. Rutherford,et al.  Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. , 1997, Journal of vascular surgery.

[31]  Takayuki Asahara,et al.  Isolation of Putative Progenitor Endothelial Cells for Angiogenesis , 1997, Science.

[32]  R. Berenson Transplantation of CD34+ hematopoietic precursors: clinical rationale. , 1992, Transplantation proceedings.

[33]  I. Weissman,et al.  Isolation of a candidate human hematopoietic stem-cell population. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. Skinner,et al.  Progressive vs single-stage treadmill tests for evaluation of claudication. , 1991, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[35]  A. Mantovani,et al.  In vitro and in vivo activation of endothelial cells by colony-stimulating factors. , 1991, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[36]  A. Mantovani,et al.  Granulocyte- and granulocyte– macrophage-colony stimulating factors induce human endothelial cells to migrate and proliferate , 1989, Nature.

[37]  Mark D. Huffman,et al.  Heart disease and stroke statistics--2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. , 2013, Circulation.

[38]  M. Arai,et al.  Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: a noninvasive regeneration therapy for treating atherosclerotic peripheral artery disease. , 2006, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.

[39]  M. Fackler,et al.  CD34: structure, biology, and clinical utility. , 1996, Blood.

[40]  L. Terstappen,et al.  Harvesting and enrichment of hematopoietic progenitor cells mobilized into the peripheral blood of normal donors by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or G-CSF: potential role in allogeneic marrow transplantation. , 1995, Blood.