On latency distribution and scaling: from finite to large Cognitive Radio Networks under general mobility

Cognitive Radio Networks (CRNs), as a phenomenal technique to improve spectrum efficiency for opportunistic communications, become an integral component in the future communication regime. In this paper, we study the end-to-end latency in CRNs because many CRN applications, such as military networks and emergency networks, are either time-sensitive or dependent on delay performance. In particular, we consider a general mobility framework that captures most characteristics of the existing models and accounts for spatial heterogeneity resulting from the scenario that some locations are more likely to be visited by mobile nodes (these can be home in the case of people, or garage in the case of vehicles). By assuming that secondary users are mobile under this general framework, we find that there exists a cutoff point on the mobility radius #, which indicates how far a mobile node can reach in the spatial domain, below which the latency has a heavy-tailed distribution and above which the tail distribution is bounded by some Gamma (light-tailed) distribution. A heavy tail of the latency implies a significant probability that it takes long time to disseminate a message from the source to the destination and thus a light-tailed latency is crucial for time-critical applications. Moreover, as the network grows large, we notice that the latency is asymptotically scalable (linear) with the dissemination distance (e.g., the number of hops or Euclidean distance). Another interesting observation is that although the density of primary users adversely impacts the expected latency, it makes no influence on the dichotomy of the tail distribution of the latency in finite networks and the linearity of latency in large networks. Our results encourage the CRN deployment for real-time and large applications, when the mobility radius of secondary users is large enough.

[1]  Devavrat Shah,et al.  Throughput-delay trade-off in wireless networks , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[2]  T. Lindvall Lectures on the Coupling Method , 1992 .

[3]  Paolo Giaccone,et al.  Capacity scaling in delay tolerant networks with heterogeneous mobile nodes , 2007, MobiHoc '07.

[4]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  Delay and Capacity Trade-Offs in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks: A Global Perspective , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[5]  Eytan Modiano,et al.  Capacity and delay tradeoffs for ad hoc mobile networks , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[6]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  On the Connectivity and Multihop Delay of Ad Hoc Cognitive Radio Networks , 2009, 2010 IEEE International Conference on Communications.

[7]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  Large wireless networks under fading, mobility, and delay constraints , 2004, IEEE INFOCOM 2004.

[8]  Jun Zhao,et al.  Distributed coordination in dynamic spectrum allocation networks , 2005, First IEEE International Symposium on New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2005. DySPAN 2005..

[9]  Do Young Eun,et al.  Crossing over the bounded domain: from exponential to power-law inter-meeting time in MANET , 2007, MobiCom '07.

[10]  Panganamala Ramana Kumar,et al.  RHEINISCH-WESTFÄLISCHE TECHNISCHE HOCHSCHULE AACHEN , 2001 .

[11]  Yi Xu,et al.  The Speed of Information Propagation in Large Wireless Networks , 2008, IEEE INFOCOM 2008 - The 27th Conference on Computer Communications.

[12]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Impact of Mobility on the Performance of Relaying in Ad Hoc Networks , 2006, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2006. 25TH IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications.

[13]  Ian F. Akyildiz,et al.  NeXt generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: A survey , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[14]  Edmund M. Yeh,et al.  On the latency for information dissemination in mobile wireless networks , 2008, MobiHoc '08.

[15]  Lei Sun,et al.  On Study of Achievable Capacity with Hybrid Relay in Cognitive Radio Networks , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[16]  T. Liggett An Improved Subadditive Ergodic Theorem , 1985 .

[17]  David Tse,et al.  Mobility increases the capacity of ad hoc wireless networks , 2002, TNET.