Sustainable urban development and the multi- level transition perspective

Abstract This article discusses some challenges and possible adaptations of transition theory as a framework for analyzing the prospects for environmentally more sustainable development of urban land use and transport infrastructure. Rather than depending first and foremost on niche innovations, a transition toward sustainable urban development is a matter of changing the composition of existing multi-segmented land use and transportation regimes. Those well-experienced forms of built environment and transport infrastructure that are in line with sustainability objectives should be strengthened while those that are not should be actively constrained and reduced. Urban development in a Danish provincial city is used as a case to illustrate some of the points made in the theoretical part of the article. Due to the wide gap between present conditions and those required to realize a sustainable urban development, more attention should be directed toward landscape level conditions and possibilities for changing them.

[1]  educhenin.  Urban Transport Energy Consumption: Determinants and Strategies for its Reduction. , 2010 .

[2]  S. P. Tjallingii,et al.  Ecopolis: Strategies for ecologically sound urban development , 1995 .

[3]  Todd Litman,et al.  Generated Traffic and Induced Travel Implications for Transport Planning , 2010 .

[4]  G. Brundtland,et al.  Our common future , 1987 .

[5]  J. Pucher.  Capitalism, Socialism, and Urban Transportation Policies and Travel Behavior in the East and West , 1990 .

[6]  Petter Næss,et al.  Energy Use for Transportation in 22 Nordic Towns , 1996 .

[7]  Petter Næss,et al.  ‘New urbanism’ or metropolitan-level centralization? A comparison of the influences of metropolitan-level and neighborhood-level urban form characteristics on travel behavior. , 2011 .

[8]  Petter Næss,et al.  Urban form and travel behavior: experience from a Nordic context , 2012 .

[9]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[10]  Peter Newman,et al.  Cities and automobile dependence , 1993 .

[11]  Karl Georg Høyer,et al.  Housing as basis for sustainable consumption , 2001 .

[12]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Cities and Low Carbon Transitions , 2010 .

[13]  Robin Hickman.  Automobility in Transition. A Socio-Technical Analysis of Sustainable Transport , 2013 .

[14]  Arvid Strand,et al.  Oslo's Farewell to Urban Sprawl , 2011 .

[15]  B. Truffer,et al.  Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects , 2012 .

[16]  David Banister,et al.  Barriers to the Implementation of Urban Sustainability , 1998 .

[17]  Peter Jacques,et al.  The organisation of denial: Conservative think tanks and environmental scepticism , 2008 .

[18]  Petter Naess,et al.  Workplace Location, Modal Split and Energy Use for Commuting Trips , 1996 .

[19]  B. Lefèvre,et al.  Urban Transport Energy Consumption: Determinants and Strategies for its Reduction.. An analysis of the literature. , 2009 .

[20]  Maurie J. Cohen.  Sustainable mobility transitions and the challenge of countervailing trends: the case of personal aeromobility , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[21]  Jeffrey Kenworthy,et al.  Sustainability and Cities: Overcoming Automobile Dependence , 1999 .

[22]  Anthony Downs,et al.  The Costs of Sprawl-Revisited , 1998 .

[23]  Ole B. Jensen,et al.  Urban structure matters, even in a small town , 2004 .

[24]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[25]  Robert Bruegmann.  Sprawl: A Compact History , 2005 .

[26]  Nick Willams.  Achieving sustainable urban form , 2001 .

[27]  Mattias Höjer,et al.  Bilder av framtidsstaden : Tid och rum för hållbar utveckling , 2007 .

[28]  M. Mogridge,et al.  The self-defeating nature of urban road capacity policy: A review of theories, disputes and available evidence , 1997 .

[29]  Environmental planning and management , 1984 .

[30]  Philip J. Vergragt,et al.  Technological Forecasting & Social Change Backcasting for sustainability : Introduction to the special issue , 2011 .

[31]  Petter Næss,et al.  The Emperor's Green Clothes: Growth, Decoupling, and Capitalism , 2009 .

[32]  K. Dreborg.  Essence of backcasting , 1996 .

[33]  J. Scheurer,et al.  Urban ecology, innovations in housing policy and the future of cities: Towards sustainability in neighbourhood communities , 2001 .

[34]  Can urban development be made environmentally sound , 1993 .

[35]  M. Hodson,et al.  Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were? , 2010 .

[36]  Nick Gallent.  Review of ‘Achieving Sustainable Urban Form, Williams, K, Burton, E. and Jenks, M. (Eds) , 2003 .

[37]  John H. Baldwin,et al.  Environmental Planning and Management , 1985 .

[38]  Petter Næss.  Urban Planning and Sustainable Development , 2001 .

[39]  Jin Xue.  Limits to decoupling strategies for sustainable housing development: the Hangzhou experience , 2012 .

[40]  Erling Holden.  Achieving Sustainable Mobility: Everyday and Leisure-time Travel in the EU , 2007 .

[41]  Heikki Patomäki,et al.  Realist Ontology for Futures Studies , 2006 .

[42]  D. Wood.  Trunk roads and the generation of traffic , 1994 .

[43]  Lorraine Whitmarsh,et al.  A transitions model for sustainable mobility , 2009 .

[44]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[45]  M. Archer.  Being Human: The Problem of Agency , 2000 .

[46]  R. Bhaskar.  Dialectic: The Pulse of Freedom , 1993 .

[47]  Da Wood,et al.  TRUNK ROADS AND THE GENERATION OF TRAFFIC. STANDING ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON TRUNK ROAD ASSESSMENT (SACTRA) , 1994 .

[48]  F. Geels.  The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms , 2011 .

[49]  Mattias Höjer,et al.  Scenario Planning for Sustainability in Stockholm, Sweden: Environmental Justice Considerations , 2011 .