Transstenotic pressure gradients: measurement in swine--retrospectively ECG-gated 3D phase-contrast MR angiography versus endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires.

PURPOSE To prospectively evaluate the hypothesis that retrospectively electrocardiographically gated phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction (VIPR) magnetic resonance (MR) angiography data sets can be used to measure transstenotic pressure gradients (TSPGs) in vivo. MATERIALS AND METHODS TSPGs were calculated by using phase-contrast VIPR MR angiography data sets; measurements obtained with a pair of endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires served as a reference standard. With institutional animal care and use committee approval, 12 swine underwent surgical creation of stenoses at the left common carotid, right renal, and left external iliac arteries. The percentage stenosis and reference diameter of the lesions were calculated from conventional digital subtraction angiograms. A pair of 0.014-inch pressure-sensing guidewires was placed in tandem; sensors 1 cm distal and 1 cm proximal to the lesions measured the mean TSPG. Phase-contrast VIPR phase difference images were analyzed with an iterative technique based on the Navier-Stokes equations to determine the mean TSPG. Pearson product correlation was calculated, and Bland-Altman plots were generated to determine the degree of agreement between the two methods. RESULTS Twenty-one lesions (12 carotid, nine iliac; mean percentage stenosis, 52.4%; range, 29.8%-64.9%; mean reference diameter, 3.4 mm; range, 2.4-5.6 mm) were analyzed. For carotid and iliac lesions, phase-contrast VIPR and guidewire TSPG measurements were highly correlated (r = 0.952, P < .001). Bland-Altman plots (bias, 0.86 mm Hg; limits of agreement: -6.17 to 7.88 mm Hg) showed good agreement. Measurements in renal lesions (n = 9) were poorly correlated (r = -0.081, P = .835) and were excluded because of image degradation secondary to respiratory motion. CONCLUSION Phase-contrast MR angiography with VIPR enables reliable measurements of TSPG in carotid and iliac lesions that are comparable to those obtained with endovascular pressure-sensing guidewires. However, further work to compensate for respiratory motion is required to extend this technique to the renal arteries.

[1]  J Waigand,et al.  Determination of renal arterial stenosis severity: comparison of pressure gradient and vessel diameter. , 2001, Radiology.

[2]  C. Cooper,et al.  Utility of a 0.014″ pressure‐sensing guidewire to assess renal artery translesional systolic pressure gradients , 2003, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[3]  T Ebbers,et al.  Estimation of relative cardiovascular pressures using time‐resolved three‐dimensional phase contrast MRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  F. Korosec,et al.  PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. , 2005, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[5]  W. Mali,et al.  Stent placement after iliac angioplasty: comparison of hemodynamic and angiographic criteria. Dutch Iliac Stent Trial Study Group. , 1996, Radiology.

[6]  C Mistretta,et al.  Physiologic and anatomic assessment of a canine carotid artery stenosis model utilizing phase contrast with vastly undersampled isotropic projection imaging. , 2007, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[7]  M. Buonocore,et al.  4D magnetic resonance velocity mapping of blood flow patterns in the aorta in young vs. elderly normal subjects , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  W. Block,et al.  Advances in locally constrained k‐space‐based parallel MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  J C Stanley,et al.  Hemodynamically significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: MR angiographic features. , 1997, Radiology.

[10]  Noah J. Jones,et al.  Usefulness of translesional pressure gradient and pharmacological provocation for the assessment of intermediate renal artery disease , 2006, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[11]  R Eugene Zierler,et al.  Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference. , 2003, Radiology.

[12]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[13]  Multistep phase difference phase contrast imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  K. Rosenfield,et al.  Renal fractional flow reserve: A hemodynamic evaluation of moderate renal artery stenoses , 2005, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions.

[15]  Steffen Ringgaard,et al.  Arterial MR imaging phase-contrast flow measurement: improvements with varying velocity sensitivity during cardiac cycle. , 2004, Radiology.

[16]  A. Fox,et al.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[17]  S L Kaufman,et al.  Hemodynamic significance of iliac artery stenosis: pressure measurements during angiography. , 1979, Radiology.

[18]  T M Grist,et al.  MR angiography of the pelvis with variable velocity encoding and a phased-array coil. , 1994, Radiology.

[19]  T. Ebbers,et al.  Particle trace visualization of intracardiac flow using time‐resolved 3D phase contrast MRI , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  Three‐Point Phase‐Contrast Velocity Measurements with Increased Velocity‐to‐Noise Ratio , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  D C Peters,et al.  Undersampled projection‐reconstruction imaging for time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced imaging , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  Richard B Thompson,et al.  Fast measurement of intracardiac pressure differences with 2D breath‐hold phase‐contrast MRI , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Akihiro Sato,et al.  Quantitative vascular measurements in arterial occlusive disease. , 2005, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[24]  M. Prince,et al.  In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[25]  D N Firmin,et al.  Computation of flow pressure fields from magnetic resonance velocity mapping , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[26]  Walter F Block,et al.  Time‐resolved contrast‐enhanced imaging with isotropic resolution and broad coverage using an undersampled 3D projection trajectory , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[27]  P J Kilner,et al.  Visualization of Flow by Vector Analysis of Multidirectional Cine MR Velocity Mapping , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[28]  Marc S. Schwartzberg,et al.  Quality improvement guidelines for angiography, angioplasty, and stent placement in the diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis in adults. , 2002, Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR.

[29]  M H Buonocore.  Blood flow measurement using variable velocity encoding in the RR interval , 1993, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[30]  T Ebbers,et al.  Three dimensional flow in the human left atrium , 2001, Heart.

[31]  Armando Manduca,et al.  Self‐navigated motion correction using moments of spatial projections in radial MRI , 2004 .

[32]  D. Peters,et al.  Undersampled projection reconstruction applied to MR angiography , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[33]  D. Laidlaw,et al.  Three‐dimensional, time‐resolved (4D) relative pressure mapping using magnetic resonance imaging , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[34]  M. Alley,et al.  Time-Resolved 3-Dimensional Velocity Mapping in the Thoracic Aorta: Visualization of 3-Directional Blood Flow Patterns in Healthy Volunteers and Patients , 2004, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[35]  P Boesiger,et al.  Visualization of flow patterns distal to aortic valve prostheses in humans using a fast approach for cine 3D velocity mapping , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[36]  Amir A Amini,et al.  Factors affecting the accuracy of pressure measurements in vascular stenoses from phase‐contrast MRI , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  J Velikina,et al.  Highly constrained backprojection for time‐resolved MRI , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[38]  Michael Markl,et al.  Time‐resolved three‐dimensional phase‐contrast MRI , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[39]  F. Korosec,et al.  Cine flow measurements using phase contrast with undersampled projections: In vitro validation and preliminary results in vivo , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[40]  B. Wranne,et al.  Temporally resolved 3D phase‐contrast imaging , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[41]  J. H. van Bockel,et al.  Hemodynamic significance of renal artery stenosis: digital subtraction angiography versus systolically gated three-dimensional phase-contrast MR angiography. , 1997, Radiology.