The use of social networking platforms for sexual health promotion: identifying key strategies for successful user engagement

BackgroundOnline social networking platforms such as Facebook and Twitter have grown rapidly in popularity, with opportunities for interaction enhancing their health promotion potential. Such platforms are being used for sexual health promotion but with varying success in reaching and engaging users. We aimed to identify Facebook and Twitter profiles that were able to engage large numbers of users, and to identify strategies used to successfully attract and engage users in sexual health promotion on these platforms.MethodsWe identified active Facebook (n = 60) and Twitter (n = 40) profiles undertaking sexual health promotion through a previous systematic review, and assessed profile activity over a one-month period. Quantitative measures of numbers of friends and followers (reach) and social media interactions were assessed, and composite scores used to give profiles an ‘engagement success’ ranking. Associations between host activity, reach and interaction metrics were explored. Content of the top ten ranked Facebook and Twitter profiles was analysed using a thematic framework and compared with five poorly performing profiles to identify strategies for successful user engagement.ResultsProfiles that were able to successfully engage large numbers of users were more active and had higher levels of interaction per user than lower-ranked profiles. Strategies used by the top ten ranked profiles included: making regular posts/tweets (median 46 posts or 124 tweets/month for top-ranked profiles versus six posts or six tweets for poorly-performing profiles); individualised interaction with users (85% of top-ranked profiles versus 0% for poorly-performing profiles); and encouraging interaction and conversation by posing questions (100% versus 40%). Uploading multimedia material (80% versus 30%) and highlighting celebrity involvement (70% versus 10%) were also key strategies.ConclusionSuccessful online engagement on social networking platforms can be measured through quantitative (user numbers and interactions) and basic qualitative content analysis. We identified the amount and type of host activity as key strategies for success, and in particular, regular individualised interaction with users, encouraging conversation, uploading multimedia and relevant links, and highlighting celebrity involvement. These findings provide valuable insight for achieving a high level of online engagement through social networking platforms to support successful health promotion initiatives.

[1]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measuring User Influence in Twitter: The Million Follower Fallacy , 2010, ICWSM.

[2]  Harri Oinas-Kukkonen,et al.  Behavior Change Support Systems: The Next Frontier for Web Science , 2010 .

[3]  Jennifer Duke,et al.  Methodological considerations in analyzing Twitter data. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[4]  Scott H. Burton,et al.  Evaluating Social Media’s Capacity to Develop Engaged Audiences in Health Promotion Settings , 2013, Health Promotion Practice.

[5]  Kimberly A. Neuendorf,et al.  The Content Analysis Guidebook , 2001 .

[6]  Mike Mannion,et al.  Interactive Multimedia and Learning: Realizing the Bene(cid:142) ts , 2001 .

[7]  Reza Zafarani,et al.  Social Media Mining: An Introduction , 2014 .

[8]  Jasna Kuljis,et al.  Applying content analysis to Web based content , 2010, Proceedings of the ITI 2010, 32nd International Conference on Information Technology Interfaces.

[9]  B. Shneiderman,et al.  The Reader-to-Leader Framework: Motivating Technology-Mediated Social Participation , 2009 .

[10]  W. Velicer,et al.  The Transtheoretical Model of Health Behavior Change , 1997, American journal of health promotion : AJHP.

[11]  L. Neville,et al.  Computer-tailored dietary behaviour change interventions: a systematic review , 2009, Health education research.

[12]  E. Rogers,et al.  Entertainment-Education: A Communication Strategy for Social Change , 1999 .

[13]  B. J. Fogg Mass Interpersonal Persuasion: An Early View of a New Phenomenon , 2008, PERSUASIVE.

[14]  D. Levine,et al.  Interventions using new digital media to improve adolescent sexual health: a systematic review. , 2012, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[15]  BJ Fogg,et al.  Creating persuasive technologies: an eight-step design process , 2009, Persuasive '09.

[16]  Steve Howard,et al.  Developing Health Promotion Interventions on Social Networking Sites: Recommendations from The FaceSpace Project , 2012, Journal of medical Internet research.

[17]  Jennifer L. Pomeranz,et al.  The Delivery of Public Health Interventions via the Internet: Actualizing Their Potential , 2011 .

[18]  Maged N Kamel Boulos,et al.  The emerging Web 2.0 social software: an enabling suite of sociable technologies in health and health care education. , 2007, Health information and libraries journal.

[19]  S Chapman,et al.  Gone viral? Heard the buzz? A guide for public health practitioners and researchers on how Web 2.0 can subvert advertising restrictions and spread health information , 2008, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[20]  Joseph Lampel,et al.  The Role of Status-Seeking in Online Communities: Giving the Gift of Experience , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[21]  Hermann A. Maurer,et al.  The Transformation of the Web: How Emerging Communities Shape the Information we Consume , 2006, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[22]  Steve Howard,et al.  Sexual health promotion on social networking sites: a process evaluation of The FaceSpace Project. , 2013, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[23]  Steve Howard,et al.  Queer as F**k: Reaching and Engaging Gay Men in Sexual Health Promotion through Social Networking Sites , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  Seung-Kwon Myung,et al.  Effects of Web- and computer-based smoking cessation programs: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. , 2009, Archives of internal medicine.

[25]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[26]  S. Howard,et al.  A systematic examination of the use of Online social networking sites for sexual health promotion , 2011, BMC public health.

[27]  Faisal Taher,et al.  Exploring the facebook experience: a new approach to usability , 2008, NordiCHI.

[28]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials, 1988-2007. , 2008, Preventive medicine.

[29]  Sarah M. Greene,et al.  The Role of Engagement in a Tailored Web-Based Smoking Cessation Program: Randomized Controlled Trial , 2008, Journal of medical Internet research.

[30]  Sonal Singh,et al.  Influencing behavioral change by customer engagement amongst youth , 2011, Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics.

[31]  J. Brug,et al.  Strategies to Facilitate Exposure to Internet-Delivered Health Behavior Change Interventions Aimed at Adolescents or Young Adults: A Systematic Review , 2011, Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education.

[32]  D. Prevention Ottawa charter for health promotion. , 1986, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.