Most traditional work by political sociologists conceives of social movement activity and politics as pertaining only to the public world and political activity as inherently masculine. Women are virtually invisible in these accounts. That the nature of political and social change is shaped by the organization of gender is a fact obscured in the conceptualizations typically employed. One such concept is political generation. Virtually no scholarly work has been done to analyze women in terms of political generations. Political generations are taken as sex-neutral phenomena with no hint that the organization of politics is based in the social organization of gender. Indeed, perhaps the major assumption of generational analysis, that generations are formed during youth and its accompanying period of rebellion and change, has not been subject to sustained scrutiny; this model may well capture the male, but possibly not, the female experience. Nevertheless, the generational model might be usefully applied to an understanding of the growth and transformation of the women's movement. When women are put at the center of inquiry, the notion of political generations takes on new meanings, and it raises questions about who, how, and when social groups come to experience similar perceptions and understandings of reality. This analysis begins with a selective summary of the assumptions and directions of generational analysis in social science. Contemporary media use of generational analysis follows with an eye to the ways in which media representation has shaped some women's movement dialogue. Feminist generational thinking is explored as it attempts to account for the history of the women's movements in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and for the relations of young and old in the contemporary movement. Possible directions for further research and reformulation are suggested.
[1]
L. Rupp.
The Women's Community in the National Woman's Party, 1945 to the 1960s
,
1985,
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.
[2]
Judith Stacey,et al.
THE MISSING FEMINIST REVOLUTION IN SOCIOLOGY
,
1985
.
[3]
Elaine M. Zimmerman.
California Hearings on the Feminization of Poverty
,
1984,
Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.
[4]
D. Dannefer.
Adult development and social theory: A paradigmatic reappraisal.
,
1984
.
[5]
E. Ross,et al.
It Seems We've Stood and Talked Like This Before: Wisdom From the 1920s
,
1983
.
[6]
Irene J. Dabrowski.
WORKING-CLASS WOMEN AND CIVIC ACTION: A CASE STUDY OF AN INNOVATIVE COMMUNITY ROLE*
,
1983
.
[7]
Richard Flacks,et al.
The Liberated Generation: An Exploration of the Roots of Student Protest1
,
1967
.
[8]
B. T. Dill.
Race, Class, and Gender: Prospects for an All-Inclusive Sisterhood
,
1983
.
[9]
E. Freedman.
Separatism as Strategy: Female Institution Building and American Feminism, 1870-1930
,
1979
.