Mars Sphere of Influence Maneuvers for NASA’s Evolvable Mars Campaign

NASA's Human Spaceflight Architecture Team is refining human exploration architectures that will extend human presence to the Martian surface. For both Mars orbital and surface missions, NASA's Evolvable Mars Campaign assumes that cargo and crew can be delivered repeatedly to the same destination. Up to this point, interplanetary trajectories have been optimized to minimize the total propulsive requirements of the in-space transportation systems, while the pre-deployed assets and surface systems are optimized to minimize their respective propulsive requirements separate from the in-space transportation system. There is a need to investigate the coupled problem of optimizing the interplanetary trajectory and optimizing the maneuvers within Mars's sphere of influence. This paper provides a description of the ongoing method development, analysis and initial results of the effort to resolve the discontinuity between the interplanetary trajectory and the Mars sphere of influence trajectories. Assessment of Phobos and Deimos orbital missions shows the in-space transportation and crew taxi allocations are adequate for missions in the 2030s. Because the surface site has yet to be selected, the transportation elements must be sized to provide enough capability to provide surface access to all landing sites under consideration. Analysis shows access to sites from elliptical parking orbits with a lander that is designed for sub-periapsis landing location is either infeasible or requires expensive orbital maneuvers for many latitude ranges. In this case the locus of potential arrival perigee vectors identifies the potential maximum north or south latitudes accessible. Higher arrival velocities can decrease reorientation costs and increase landing site availability. Utilizing hyperbolic arrival and departure vectors in the optimization scheme will increase transportation site accessibility and provide more optimal solutions.

[1]  Raymond G. Merrill,et al.  Mars Hybrid Propulsion System Trajectory Analysis. Part II; Cargo Missions , 2015 .

[2]  Melissa L. McGuire,et al.  In-Space Transportation for NASA's Evolvable Mars Campaign , 2015 .

[3]  John Baker,et al.  Human Missions to Mars Orbit, Phobos, and Mars Surface Using 100-kWe-Class Solar Electric Propulsion , 2014 .

[4]  Stephen J. Hoffman,et al.  Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team , 1997 .

[5]  Christopher A. Jones,et al.  Commercial Options for Hybrid Chemical/Electric Propulsion Transportation System to Support Mars Exploration , 2016 .

[6]  Bret G. Drake,et al.  Reference Mission Version 3.0 Addendum to the Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team. Addendum; 3.0 , 1998 .

[7]  Raymond G. Merrill,et al.  An Integrated Hybrid Transportation Architecture for Human Mars Expeditions , 2015 .

[8]  Damon Landau,et al.  Method for Parking-Orbit Reorientation for Human Missions to Mars , 2005 .

[9]  John Connolly,et al.  Human Exploration of Mars: The Reference Mission of the NASA Mars Exploration Study Team , 1998 .

[10]  S. Hoffman,et al.  Human exploration of Mars, Design Reference Architecture 5.0 , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[12]  Raymond G. Merrill,et al.  Mars conjunction crewed missions with a reusable hybrid architecture , 2015, 2015 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[13]  N Desai Prasun,et al.  Aspects of Parking Orbit Selection in a Manned Mars Mission , 2003 .

[14]  Stephen J. Hoffman,et al.  Human Mars landing site and impacts on Mars surface operations , 2016, 2016 IEEE Aerospace Conference.