Development of a polishing step using a hydrophobic interaction membrane adsorber with a PER.C6®‐derived recombinant antibody

Membrane chromatography has already proven to be a powerful alternative to polishing columns in flow‐through mode for contaminant removal. As flow‐through utilization has expanded, membrane chromatography applications have included the capturing of large molecules, including proteins such as IgGs. Such bind‐and‐elute applications imply the demand for high binding capacity and larger membrane surface areas as compared to flow‐through applications. Given these considerations, a new Sartobind Phenyl™ membrane adsorber was developed for large‐scale purification of biomolecules based on hydrophobic interaction chromatography (HIC) principles. The new hydrophobic membrane adsorber combines the advantages of membrane chromatography—virtually no diffusion limitation and shorter processing time—with high binding capacity for proteins comparable to that of conventional HIC resins as well as excellent resolution. Results from these studies confirmed the capability of HIC membrane adsorber to purify therapeutic proteins with high dynamic binding capacities in the range of 20 mg‐MAb/cm3‐membrane and excellent impurity reduction. In addition the HIC phenyl membrane adsorber can operate at five‐ to ten‐fold lower residence time when compared to column chromatography. A bind/elute purification step using the HIC membrane adsorber was developed for a recombinant monoclonal antibody produced using the PER.C6® cell line. Loading and elution conditions were optimized using statistical design of experiments. Scale‐up is further discussed, and the performance of the membrane adsorber is compared to a traditional HIC resin used in column chromatography. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010; 105: 296–305. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Nathalie Fraud Membrane Chromatography: An Alternative to Polishing Column Chromatography , 2008 .

[2]  David R H Evans,et al.  Purification of an Fc-fusion biologic: clearance of multiple product related impurities by hydrophobic interaction chromatography. , 2008, Journal of chromatography. A.

[3]  Peter S Lam,et al.  Discussion of: Statistical and Regulatory Issues with the Application of Propensity Score Analysis to Nonrandomized Medical Device Clinical Studies , 2007 .

[4]  Tim Tressel,et al.  Current Therapeutic Antibody Production and Process Optimization , 2006 .

[5]  R. Ghosh,et al.  Purification of humanized monoclonal antibodies by membrane-based hybrid bioseparation technique. , 2006, Journal of immunological methods.

[6]  Lu Wang,et al.  Purification of humanized monoclonal antibody by hydrophobic interaction membrane chromatography. , 2006, Journal of chromatography. A.

[7]  A. Mahn,et al.  Predicting Protein Retention Time in Hydrophobic Interaction Chromatography , 2005 .

[8]  A. Jungbauer,et al.  Hydrophobic interaction chromatography of proteins. III. Unfolding of proteins upon adsorption. , 2005, Journal of chromatography. A.

[9]  Kyoichi Saito,et al.  Protein binding to polymer brush, based on ion-exchange, hydrophobic, and affinity interactions. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[10]  A. Jungbauer,et al.  Hydrophobic interaction chromatography of proteins. II. Binding capacity, recovery and mass transfer properties. , 2003, Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences.

[11]  Raja Ghosh,et al.  Protein separation using membrane chromatography: opportunities and challenges. , 2002, Journal of chromatography. A.

[12]  Kyoichi Saito,et al.  Control of phenyl-group site introduced on the graft chain for hydrophobic interaction chromatography , 1996 .

[13]  Kyoichi Saito,et al.  Preparation of a hydrophobic porous membrane containing phenyl groups and its protein adsorption performance , 1995 .

[14]  Kyoichi Saito,et al.  Protein adsorption capacity of a porous phenylalanine-containing membrane based on a polyethylene matrix , 1991 .

[15]  J. Porath,et al.  Salting-out in Amphiphilic Gels as a New Approach to Hydrophobia Adsorption , 1973, Nature.

[16]  A. Rathore,et al.  Upcoming Technologies to Facilitate More Efficient Biologics Manufacturing , 2009 .

[17]  J. M. Coco-Martin,et al.  A review of therapeutic protein expression by mammalian cells , 2008 .

[18]  Joe X. Zhou,et al.  Disposable chromatography : Single-use membrane chromatography as a polishing option during antibody production is gaining momentum , 2007 .

[19]  Uwe Gottschalk,et al.  Process chromatography : Five decades of innovation , 2007 .

[20]  Joe X. Zhou,et al.  Basic Concepts in Q Membrane Chromatography for Large‐Scale Antibody Production , 2006, Biotechnology progress.

[21]  P. Gagnon,et al.  Large-scale process development for hydrophobic interaction chromatography. II: Controlling process variation , 1995 .

[22]  P. Gagnon,et al.  Large-scale process development for hydrophobic interaction chromatography. I: Gel selection and development of binding conditions , 1995 .

[23]  A. Tiselius Adsorption separation by salting out. , 1948 .