Three-dimensional visibility analysis and visual quality computation for urban open spaces aided by Google SketchUp and WebGIS

In this article, the authors has explored the feasibility of three-dimensional visibility analysis and visual quality computation via the aid of Google SketchUp and WebGIS, which may be beneficial for measurable evaluation of the environment in urban open spaces, and referential for urban planning and design to build an environment with better visual comfort. Considered for long-term significance, three-dimensional visibility analysis and visual quality computation are potential in enabling the quantitative analysis between urban open spaces and visual perception, providing appropriate standard for the evaluation of environment, and making the future planning and design rational and reasonable. Due to the easy access for entry-level programmer and the public, Google SketchUp and WebGIS were adopted as proper and efficient tools for three-dimensional visibility analysis in this research, which considerably decreased the programming development difficulty. Both SketchUp and WebGIS are thought to be well accepted by the public, as SketchUp has been popularized in three-dimensional modelling and WebGIS has been familiar as the form of websites for a long period, which may enable the dissemination of visibility analysis to the public. From a pilot study of progresses based on the past scholars’ researches, the authors developed an improved method for three-dimensional visibility analysis, by mathematically deriving the visual factors from the spatial relationship analysis of buildings, terrain and other geographical features. A few quantitative factors such as the distance, solid angle and visual field (a distribution of occupied solid angle in all directions) valued in spherical coordinate system were adopted as the basic units for visibility levels. Starting from the space prototype, the research has also focused on several aspects possibly associated with the visual effects in open spaces, including the openness, enclosure and ground coverage for edge; the distribution and dispersion for skyline and the visibility of individual building for landmark. For further comparison, the variances of those figures were also noticed during space scales changing for the prototype, in order to find possible connection or changing trend before and after. Moreover, experiments of three-dimensional visibility analysis have been designed and taken for real scenes to discover the similarities or differences between prototype and reality, and Piazza del Campo (Siena, Italy), Piazza San Marco (Venice, Italy) and Olomouc centre area (Olomouc, Czech) have been selected as the first group of candidates. Those would be the possible references for making quantitative assessments in real scenes via collection of visual factors, enabling the comparison of similarities and differences among various urban open spaces.

[1]  Peter F. Fisher,et al.  First Experiments in Viewshed Uncertainty: Simulating Fuzzy Viewsheds , 1992 .

[2]  Juan M. Domingo-Santos,et al.  The visual exposure in forest and rural landscapes: An algorithm and a GIS tool , 2011 .

[3]  Israel A. Wagner,et al.  Spatial Openness as a Practical Metric for Evaluating Built-up Environments , 2003 .

[4]  T. Lin,et al.  3D VISIBILITY ANALYSIS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENT-COGNITION RESEARCH BASED ON VGE , 2013 .

[5]  Dafna Fisher-Gewirtzman,et al.  View-oriented three-dimensional visual analysis models for the urban environment , 2005 .

[6]  Bige Tunçer,et al.  Visibility Analysis for 3D Urban Environments , 2013 .

[7]  Marcos Llobera,et al.  Modeling visibility through vegetation , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[8]  M. Benedikt,et al.  To Take Hold of Space: Isovists and Isovist Fields , 1979 .

[9]  D. Wheatley Spatial analysis and social spaces: Interdisciplinary approaches to the interpretation of prehistoric and historic built environments , 2014 .

[10]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Visual Permeability, Locomotive Permeability, Safety, and Enclosure , 2005 .

[11]  Hui Lin,et al.  3D VISIBILITY ANALYSIS IN URBAN ENVIRONMENT - COGNITION RESEARCH BASED ON VGE , 2013 .

[12]  Ian Bentley,et al.  Responsive environments : a manual for designers , 1985 .

[13]  A. Bregt,et al.  Validation of isovist variables as predictors of perceived landscape openness , 2014 .

[14]  Michael S. Bittermann,et al.  Visual perception model for architectural design , 2008 .

[15]  Eleftheria Paliou Visibility analysis in 3D built spaces: a new dimension to the understanding of social space , 2014 .

[16]  Francis D. K. Ching,et al.  Architecture form, space and order , 1979 .

[17]  Thomas Leduc,et al.  Towards a "typification" of the Pedestrian Surrounding Space: Analysis of the Isovist Using Digital processing Method , 2011, AGILE Conf..

[18]  Michael Batty,et al.  Exploring Isovist Fields: Space and Shape in Architectural and Urban Morphology , 2001 .

[19]  Michael Benedikt,et al.  Cityspace, Cyberspace, and the Spatiology of Information , 2008 .

[20]  Jan Malte Wiener,et al.  Isovists as a Means to Predict Spatial Experience and Behavior , 2004, Spatial Cognition.

[21]  Arnold Bregt,et al.  Three Sampling Methods for Visibility Measures of Landscape Perception , 2007, COSIT.

[22]  Carlo Ratti,et al.  A Digital Image of the City: 3D Isovists in Lynch's Urban Analysis , 2009 .

[23]  Kevin Lynch,et al.  The Image of the City , 1960 .

[24]  Perry Pei-Ju Yang,et al.  Viewsphere: A GIS-Based 3D Visibility Analysis for Urban Design Evaluation , 2007 .

[25]  L. Loures,et al.  Quantitative Methods in Environmental and Visual Quality Mapping and Assessment: A Muskegon, Michigan Watershed Case Study with Urban Planning Implications , 2012 .

[26]  A. Turner,et al.  From Isovists to Visibility Graphs: A Methodology for the Analysis of Architectural Space , 2001 .

[27]  Arthur E. Stamps,et al.  Evaluating enclosure in urban sites , 2001 .

[28]  Michael J. Meitner,et al.  A route-based visibility analysis for landscape management , 2013 .

[29]  Mark Francis,et al.  Control as a Dimension of Public-Space Quality , 1989 .

[30]  M. Llobera,et al.  Extending GIS-based visual analysis: the concept of visualscapes , 2003, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[31]  Thomas Leduc,et al.  Measuring Surrounding Space to Assess the Pedestrian Visual Aperture Angle in the Urban Fabric: Toward a Kurtosis-Based Isovist Indicator , 2011, IF&GIS.

[32]  Dalit Shach-Pinsly,et al.  Visual Exposure and Visual Openness: An Integrated Approach and Comparative Evaluation , 2011 .

[33]  Denis J. Dean Improving the accuracy of forest viewsheds using triangulated networks and the visual permeability method , 1997 .

[34]  Arthur E Stamps,et al.  Isovists, Enclosure, and Permeability Theory , 2005 .

[35]  J. Peponis,et al.  Seen in a different light. Icons in Byzantine museums and churches , 2005 .