Growth of the Mandible after Condylar Reconstruction Using Transport Distraction Osteogenesis: An Experimental Investigation in Goats

Background: Mandibular condyle damage during childhood disturbs mandibular growth and facial skeletal development. Transport distraction osteogenesis provides a new treatment for condyle reconstruction, but there are no data available on mandibular growth in growing individuals following surgery. The authors investigated the effect of condylar reconstruction by transport distraction osteogenesis on mandibular growth in goats. Methods: A condylar defect was created unilaterally in 44 growing goats. The animals were divided randomly into group A (n = 22) and group B (n = 22). Transport distraction was used to reconstruct the condyles in group A, whereas group B served as sham controls. Three-dimensional computed tomographic imaging was performed at different intervals. Ten animals from each group were used for mandibular growth measurements at 48 weeks after the end of distraction. Four animals from each group were euthanized at 12, 24, and 48 weeks after surgery. Their transport disks were harvested and processed for histologic evaluation. Results: In group A, the hemimandible of the distracted side exhibited similarities to the contralateral side except for the larger neocondyles. In group B, ramus height and width were significantly shorter on the undistracted side than on the contralateral side; concomitantly, there was mandibular deviation to the operated side. Well-organized fibrocartilage was seen at the neocondylar surface over time in group A but not in group B. Conclusions: This study suggests that a neocondyle reconstructed by means of transport distraction has the potential to grow under functional stimuli of the temporomandibular joint. Therefore, this technique may serve as an alternative method for condylar reconstruction in growing individuals.

[1]  S U Stucki-McCormick,et al.  Reconstruction of a neocondyle using transport distraction osteogenesis. , 1999, Seminars in orthodontics.

[2]  J. Kent,et al.  A retrospective study of the costochondral graft in TMJ reconstruction. , 2003, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  K. Harii,et al.  An experimental study on the growth of condylar cartilage, using a new vascularized mandible heterotopic transplant model. , 2003, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[4]  G S Beaupré,et al.  Mechanical factors in bone growth and development. , 1996, Bone.

[5]  D. Burr,et al.  The Effects of Dynamic Axial Loading on the Rat Growth Plate , 2002, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  S. Buchman,et al.  Mandibular Distraction in the Absence of an Ascending Ramus and Condyle , 2002, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[7]  J. Heeley,et al.  Tissue Repair After Condylectomy in Growing Macaca fascicularis , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[8]  M. Moss The functional matrix concept and its relationship to temporomandibular joint dysfunction and treatment. , 1983, Dental clinics of North America.

[9]  T Takato,et al.  Experimental study of reconstruction of the temporomandibular joint using a bone transport technique. , 2000, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[10]  C H Turner,et al.  Three rules for bone adaptation to mechanical stimuli. , 1998, Bone.

[11]  S U Stucki-McCormick,et al.  Reconstruction of the Mandibular Condyle Using Transport Distraction Osteogenesis , 1997, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[12]  T. Peltomäki,et al.  Growth of a costochondral graft in the rat temporomandibular joint. , 1992, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[13]  Jing Hu,et al.  Reconstruction of mandibular condyle by transport distraction osteogenesis: Experimental study in rhesus monkey. , 2006, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[14]  The functional matrix concept and its relationship to temporomandibular joint dysfunction and treatment. , 1983 .

[15]  W. Ehler,et al.  A comparison of the form and function of the human, monkey, and goat temporomandibular joint. , 1994, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[16]  Y. R. Chen,et al.  Temporomandibular joint reconstruction in children using costochondral grafts. , 1999, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[17]  D. Carlson,et al.  Growth of the mandible after replacement of the mandibular condyle: an experimental investigation in Macaca mulatta. , 2002, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[18]  Ü. Şahin,et al.  Preserved Costal Cartilage Homograft Application for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Ankylosis , 2001, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[19]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Transport distraction osteogenesis: a new method to heal adult calvarial defects. , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[20]  B. Guyuron,et al.  Unpredictable growth pattern of costochondral graft. , 1992, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[21]  J. McCarthy,et al.  Distraction Osteogenesis of Costochondral Bone Grafts in the Mandible , 2002, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[22]  T. Peltomäki,et al.  Histologic Structure of Human Costochondral Junction , 1994, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.